• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Looking for advice on '88 GT I'm looking to buy...

  • Thread starter Thread starter wildswing
  • Start date Start date Sep 24, 2004
W

wildswing

New Member
Aug 6, 2004
19
0
1
Soo, Canada
Sep 24, 2004
#1
  • Sep 24, 2004
  • #1
Hi folks,

Newbie here. I've posted THIS in the Canadian regional section, but any feedback you folks might have would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advice!
 

89CopCoupe

Banned
Feb 17, 2004
606
0
0
Post Count City
Sep 25, 2004
#2
  • Sep 25, 2004
  • #2
'87-'88 cars have only two drawbacks compared to '89-'93 cars...

1- they use a speed density injection system instead of mass air (don't take well to certain mods like mass air cars do)

2-they have 85mph speedos unless it's a Canadian car in which case I don't know ... 90-93 5.0 cars came with 140mph instrument clusters.

Although '87-'89 cars don't have an airbag so they came with tilt steering Although '90-up cars came with the much coveted black interior. My prefered year is '89 as you can see from my screen name
 
W

wildswing

New Member
Aug 6, 2004
19
0
1
Soo, Canada
Sep 25, 2004
#3
  • Sep 25, 2004
  • #3
Thanks! Anyone else care to ring in with their info or opinions? I'd appreciate it.
 

blkstangman88

New Member
Apr 6, 2004
646
0
0
Sep 26, 2004
#4
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #4
i havnt had a problem with my 88 gt. i love it, ive heard the 88s are the lighter ones cuz they didnt really come wiht options so they may be quicker but i wouldnt count on that to much. i agree with the fact that its a con that they dont have the maf but thats a easy add on from a local junk yard and a parts list, thats what i did.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 26, 2004
#5
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #5
My '87 GT (now LX) is tip top. The Speed Density Stangs were a little quicker than the Mass Air cars in stock form, not because of any weight advantage, but because of their slightly more aggressive cam profiles and timing curves.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Sep 26, 2004
#6
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #6
Gearbanger 101 said:
My '87 GT (now LX) is tip top. The Speed Density Stangs were a little quicker than the Mass Air cars in stock form, not because of any weight advantage, but because of their slightly more aggressive cam profiles and timing curves.
Click to expand...

Doesn't hurt that SD doesn't have the intake restriction of a mass air meter either.
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Sep 26, 2004
#7
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #7
Being from Canada I would check the undercarriage for excessive rust. I hear the winters up there really take their toll on cars with rust. Especially it being almost what 17 years old now.
 
W

wildswing

New Member
Aug 6, 2004
19
0
1
Soo, Canada
Sep 26, 2004
#8
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #8
Thanks for the replies fellas. If you follow the link in the original post above, you'll see my post in tha Canadain seciton with more details and a link to a slideshow of pictures I took a while back. The underside is really clean and almost rust free.

Any of you have a shop manual or know of a good online VIN/body numbers decoder?

Here's a picture of the door plate.

 
W

wildswing

New Member
Aug 6, 2004
19
0
1
Soo, Canada
Sep 26, 2004
#9
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #9
I found a decoder at http://www.mustanggt.org/forms/88decode.htm

The only thing it couldn't decode were the front and rear spring codes; both BB. Any idea what those mean?
 

Henceforward

The Avatar Master
Founding Member
Jul 17, 2001
485
0
0
Sep 26, 2004
#10
  • Sep 26, 2004
  • #10
wildswing said:
Any of you know of a good online VIN/body numbers decoder?

Click to expand...

http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/timeline/87-93/88/

Vehicle Identification Numbers

1FA Ford Motor Co.
B Restraint System (B-Active belts)
P Passenger car
42 Body code for coupe LX (42- Hatchback GT)
E Engine code (5.0L, EFI, V-8, 225 hp, HO, E Code)
4 Check digit which varies
J Year (J-1988)
F Plant (F-Dearborn)
000001 Consecutive unit number

This is yours: 1FABP42E4JF291661
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Engine 1988 Foxbody idle issues
  • fernandosgarage55
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
631
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2026
AeroCoupe
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
M
Another Newbie
  • markb
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
208
The Welcome Wagon Dec 7, 2025
markb
M
Buying with a bad motor?
  • djj62478
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
303
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2026
TTSaleen
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?