• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

looking for advice on a carb

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangmike6996
  • Start date Start date Mar 8, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

mustangmike6996

5 Year Member
Nov 10, 2005
483
6
29
clinton twp, MI
Mar 8, 2012
#1
  • Mar 8, 2012
  • #1
im building a 331 stroker. perf rpm heads with 2.02 intake valves. perf rpm intake. mild/large cam.

what CFM do you guys recommend? i have heard anything from 550-700 cfm.

also im looking at holley street avenger. how are they? i know the double pumpers were all the talk a long time ago.

i dont like edelbrock style because they are based off of a rochester quadrajet (which arent that good)
 
I

ihadagt500

New Member
Feb 5, 2012
10
0
1
Mar 8, 2012
#2
  • Mar 8, 2012
  • #2
You may not like Edelbrocks because they are based on a Carter AFB, not a Q-jet, which is probably the best carb ever produced. No float bowls to leak, no metering blocks to warp and no rubber power valves to rupture. GM used them very successfully from 1966 until fuel injection came along. They are very tuneable and they even worked quite well on 1970 429 CJ's
 

The_Dude

Member
Aug 17, 2004
137
4
19
Western Oregon
Mar 8, 2012
#3
  • Mar 8, 2012
  • #3
Get a 650, mechanical secondaries if you have a manual transmission, or vacuum secondaries if you have an automatic transmission.
 
Reactions: Falcon79

Falcon79

Active Member
Apr 6, 2009
214
8
29
Dallas, TX
Mar 9, 2012
#4
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #4
Get a 650, mechanical secondaries if you have a manual transmission, or vacuum secondaries if you have an automatic transmission.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Although I would like to also defend my edelbrock 1406 and say it has been more dependable and required less tuning than my old Holley ever did.
 

WTFO

Member
Nov 20, 2011
53
1
8
Clarks-Vegas
Mar 9, 2012
#5
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #5
The_Dude said:
Get a 650, mechanical secondaries if you have a manual transmission, or vacuum secondaries if you have an automatic transmission.
Click to expand...
+1
What are you building the engine for? Street? Drag? Autocross? Check what carb Nascar used up to the fuel injection coming in. Holley. Not Carters. Not Q-junk. How you plan to use the car is the deciding factor of which carb to buy.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Mar 9, 2012
#6
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #6
personally i very much like the edelbrock carbs. a friend of mine and is have used them almost exclusively for years now and they have all been quite reliable, even when they are on cars not used much. not so with holleys. i would use a 1406 edelbrock on your build. it is a 600 cfm carb that does quite well on a variety of combinations. so far the only engine we have used the 1406 on that hurt engine performance was on a 454 chevy making about 450hp.
 

gikort

Member
Nov 26, 2010
82
1
9
Mar 9, 2012
#7
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #7
I don't have any experience with the Street Avenger, but I have had good luck with the regular 4160 600 cfm w/ vacuum sec on a 302, and I have a 4150 600 double pumper on my '67 306. It screams. I would not use anything else. I have had this carb on the car for about 7 years and have never had to adjust it. I only drive the car in the summer, so even sitting 6-8 months a year hasn't been a problem. Holley all the way. I'm sure the Street Avenger would work great. 600-650 cfm.
 

Wicked65

Member
Aug 10, 2003
490
3
19
NORCAL
Mar 9, 2012
#8
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #8
Alex @ Money Maker Racing. Tell him Greg in California Sent you.
219-861-1214
 

mustangmike6996

5 Year Member
Nov 10, 2005
483
6
29
clinton twp, MI
Mar 9, 2012
#9
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #9
im not looking to race every weekend but i am not opposed to running its down the track a few times. itll be mostly stop light to stop light. would 600cfm be enough? i keep hearing ppl running 650 or so on 331's
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,951
2,906
194
Middle of Maine
Mar 9, 2012
#10
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #10
If going with a Holley style carb, I would go with one by Quick Fuel. Out of the box one of the best carbs you can get. And for a 331 cid small block I would go with a 750 cfm carb. A 600 would leave HP on the table. It is all about getting the air/fuel right. I can make that 331 run good on a 250 cfm 1bbl. carb or make it run good on a 1100 cfm Dominator. The HP difference between the two carbs would be huge, but they would work, no bog or anything. If the air bleeds are right and it is jetted right the size does not matter. If this is a fuel economy build (and with those heads and intake it will not be) then a 600 cfm would work just as well.
 
Reactions: BarnStang and WTFO

mustangmike6996

5 Year Member
Nov 10, 2005
483
6
29
clinton twp, MI
Mar 9, 2012
#11
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #11
i am not looking for economy as much as hp. 750 sounds like it'll help put down some power tho
 

WTFO

Member
Nov 20, 2011
53
1
8
Clarks-Vegas
Mar 9, 2012
#12
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #12
+1 on the Quick Fuel. My buddies Falcon runs a Race Q on his 347. Those guys dropped what they were doing to help us in Bowling Green last year. Great carb and good people.
 

mustangmike6996

5 Year Member
Nov 10, 2005
483
6
29
clinton twp, MI
Mar 9, 2012
#13
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #13
i see there are a TON of Race q carb options. which one would work the best? so far im looking for 750 cfm mechanical secondaries.

the ss750 doesnt look too bad. its right about 500 bucks
 

mustangmike6996

5 Year Member
Nov 10, 2005
483
6
29
clinton twp, MI
Mar 9, 2012
#14
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #14
how are the 750 cfm speed demons? they are about the same price as the quick fuel.
 

Monty_Brown

New Member
Feb 8, 2012
21
0
1
Mar 9, 2012
#15
  • Mar 9, 2012
  • #15
mustangmike6996 said:
im building a 331 stroker. perf rpm heads with 2.02 intake valves. perf rpm intake. mild/large cam.

what CFM do you guys recommend? i have heard anything from 550-700 cfm.

also im looking at holley street avenger. how are they? i know the double pumpers were all the talk a long time ago.

i dont like edelbrock style because they are based off of a rochester quadrajet (which arent that good)
Click to expand...
I have the same motor I'm running a Demon 650dp with 3:70 gears and a t-5
 

WTFO

Member
Nov 20, 2011
53
1
8
Clarks-Vegas
Mar 10, 2012
#16
  • Mar 10, 2012
  • #16
mustangmike6996 said:
i see there are a TON of Race q carb options. which one would work the best? so far im looking for 750 cfm mechanical secondaries.

the ss750 doesnt look too bad. its right about 500 bucks
Click to expand...

Again I'd say it's more about how you're going to drive the car. My buddy's Falcon although fully licensed, working lights, full interior, etc.- it's more a race car. 8 point cage, 4000 stall, 4:10 spool, M/T slicks. His Race Q doesn't have a vacuum port or a choke horn so daily driving isn't really an option. You have to look at the full range of what features you need and how convenient you need it to be. If you want to have maximum tuning ability, stick with a Holley style carb. If you want the ultimate in part quality and precision, stick with a Quick Fuel. It's a night and day difference.
 

Attachments

  • P6170326.webp
    20.4 KB · Views: 229

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Mar 11, 2012
#17
  • Mar 11, 2012
  • #17
if you are going to spend the money on a speed demon, quick fuel, or other race type carb, look at one of the companies that builds carbs to suit the application. I used prosystems, ran great out of the box. Patrick was very good with customer service also. Also, as mention earlier you can call Alex, and he'll be able to pick a carb for you.
 

The_Dude

Member
Aug 17, 2004
137
4
19
Western Oregon
Mar 11, 2012
#18
  • Mar 11, 2012
  • #18
This one might be a pretty good deal.
http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/e...e/641040-650-speed-demon-f-s.html#post4226597
 

mustangmike6996

5 Year Member
Nov 10, 2005
483
6
29
clinton twp, MI
Mar 12, 2012
#19
  • Mar 12, 2012
  • #19
The_Dude said:
This one might be a pretty good deal.
http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/e...e/641040-650-speed-demon-f-s.html#post4226597
Click to expand...


it would be but there is no provision for a choke. hmmm its pretty tempting tho
 

The_Dude

Member
Aug 17, 2004
137
4
19
Western Oregon
Mar 12, 2012
#20
  • Mar 12, 2012
  • #20
mustangmike6996 said:
it would be but there is no provision for a choke. hmmm its pretty tempting tho
Click to expand...
He didn't really word that correctly. It does have the choke horn and mount, it's just missing the choke kit. I have a couple of Demons just like that. I think Jegs still has the choke kits. It looks like he sold it anyway.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
763
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
R
351w stroked to 408 CARB
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
653
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2025
General karthief
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
384
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
213
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?