I'm looking to do an engine rebuild a few months from now and have started putting together a parts list. I'm still undecided whether to go with a 393 stroker or stick with an unstroked 351w. Either way, I plan to reuse some of the stuff I currently have: Weiand Stealth intake, Holley 670cfm and Compcams XE262H. I'll put the correct carb, cam and intake some time after the rebuild.
I've spoken to two engine builders and both of them have said that due to the poor quality of gas and specially because of the local conditions (year-round heat--I live in the Philippines), I should plan to have 9.5CR at most in order to remain streetable. That's quite a bit lower than the 10 or 10.5 I see around here.
With this limit in mind, I played around with the desktop dyno over the weekend and came to some conclusions:
1. It's a lot harder to get performance with lower compression. We all know that but I was quite surprised with how much was lost with just a little lower compression.
2. For some reason, the best builds I could come up with for the 393w and the 351w came out roughly even. Here are the builds:
393w:
6.2" rods
19.3cc dish pistons
9.5:1 CR
AFR185 61cc chambers
351w:
5.956" rods
15.9cc dish pistons
9.3:1 CR
AFR185 58cc chambers
In both cases, carb, cam and intake would be the same ones I'm currently using.
Both achieved similar 380hp/440ft.lbs numbers on the desktop dyno--in fact the 351w outperforms the stroker slightly. I would have thought that the stroker would be making better numbers. I have double checked my math and the numbers I plugged in to the dyno and they are correct. To verify, I changed the combos around to get 10:1 CR and the edge definitely goes to the stroker (~500hp/500ft.lbs).
Both buildups are comparable in cost since I plan to change all the internals. But since the 351w outperforms the stroker, should I go with that?? There's a certain elegance about getting the same output from less cubes. Or should I go with the stroker since nothing beats cubic inches??
And why the hell isn't the stroker thumping the 351w??
I've spoken to two engine builders and both of them have said that due to the poor quality of gas and specially because of the local conditions (year-round heat--I live in the Philippines), I should plan to have 9.5CR at most in order to remain streetable. That's quite a bit lower than the 10 or 10.5 I see around here.
With this limit in mind, I played around with the desktop dyno over the weekend and came to some conclusions:
1. It's a lot harder to get performance with lower compression. We all know that but I was quite surprised with how much was lost with just a little lower compression.
2. For some reason, the best builds I could come up with for the 393w and the 351w came out roughly even. Here are the builds:
393w:
6.2" rods
19.3cc dish pistons
9.5:1 CR
AFR185 61cc chambers
351w:
5.956" rods
15.9cc dish pistons
9.3:1 CR
AFR185 58cc chambers
In both cases, carb, cam and intake would be the same ones I'm currently using.
Both achieved similar 380hp/440ft.lbs numbers on the desktop dyno--in fact the 351w outperforms the stroker slightly. I would have thought that the stroker would be making better numbers. I have double checked my math and the numbers I plugged in to the dyno and they are correct. To verify, I changed the combos around to get 10:1 CR and the edge definitely goes to the stroker (~500hp/500ft.lbs).
Both buildups are comparable in cost since I plan to change all the internals. But since the 351w outperforms the stroker, should I go with that?? There's a certain elegance about getting the same output from less cubes. Or should I go with the stroker since nothing beats cubic inches??
And why the hell isn't the stroker thumping the 351w??