• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Low compression

  • Thread starter Thread starter MUSTANGJOE
  • Start date Start date May 27, 2005

MUSTANGJOE

Silver Stanger
Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,644
17
59
May 27, 2005
#1
  • May 27, 2005
  • #1
Hey guys ..

just did a compression test this week. My lowest # was 115 psi and the highest was 125psi. My engine has 79 000 miles. What can cause this low score?..should I rebuild or not? Thanks
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
May 27, 2005
#2
  • May 27, 2005
  • #2
Depends on what you are looking to do.

If you add a Charger without a tune, you will surely chew up that motor in no time. But if you are just planning on adding new heads, cam, etc... You should be OK if your car doesn't see track useage and you take care of it.

But, if you got the money... Might as well do things right the first time and get them over with.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
May 27, 2005
#3
  • May 27, 2005
  • #3
Could be worn rings or something like that. Those miles are fairly low, but they could have been hard miles.
 
J

jerry beach

Founding Member
May 20, 2002
2,671
0
46
Ocala,FL
May 27, 2005
#4
  • May 27, 2005
  • #4
Did you have the throttle plate wired wide open when you ran the test? Was the engine warm? Did you have all the plugs out when you spun it?

You can put a few ounces of oil in each cylinder and do the test again. If the #'s come up alot, then that points to bad compression rings. If you read the directions and did it properly, then fine. If not you should do the dry test over.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
May 27, 2005
#5
  • May 27, 2005
  • #5
MUSTANGJOE said:
Hey guys ..

just did a compression test this week. My lowest # was 115 psi and the highest was 125psi. My engine has 79 000 miles. What can cause this low score?..should I rebuild or not? Thanks
Click to expand...

There's nothing wrong with it the way that it is. All of your cylinders are within 10%. The Ford shop manual shows a maximum difference of 25% between the highest and lowest cylinders to be acceptable. I'd say that you're WELL within that range. That motor will likely run for another 100,000 miles.
 
B

BornInAFord

Member
Apr 22, 2005
199
0
17
Bend, OR 97701
May 27, 2005
#6
  • May 27, 2005
  • #6
Sounds ok, and like Daggar said, the most important thing is the consistency. Do you have the stock cam? An aftermarket cam often will change the dynamic compression, so your test can't be compared to other tests. In fact, often the higher perfomance cams will have even less cranking compression than the lower performance ones. Reason? Most cams have some overlap, and most aftermarket performance cams will have more overlap so they can use it to better fill the cylinder at higher RPMs. This means that at cranking speeds (400-800RPMs?), both the exhaust and intake will be slightly open at TDC.
Daniel
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 27, 2005
#7
  • May 27, 2005
  • #7
jerry beach said:
Did you have the throttle plate wired wide open when you ran the test? Was the engine warm? Did you have all the plugs out when you spun it?

You can put a few ounces of oil in each cylinder and do the test again. If the #'s come up alot, then that points to bad compression rings. If you read the directions and did it properly, then fine. If not you should do the dry test over.
Click to expand...
Well said, and what came to mind to me. Trying to compare (or look at compression numbers absolutely) is hard - too many variances in testing methods. and doing a wet test after the dry (like Jerry said) reveals a lot more info.

good luck.
 

MUSTANGJOE

Silver Stanger
Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,644
17
59
May 28, 2005
#8
  • May 28, 2005
  • #8
The motor was cold when they did the compression test. I dont know if all the plugs were in or out.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 28, 2005
#9
  • May 28, 2005
  • #9
if you have forged slugs, the fact that the motor was cold can matter (numbers can be down on a cold motor with forged slugs).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine Questions on compression test results
  • dqureshi06
  • Jan 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
381
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 7, 2025
Noobz347
03 Mustang, found dinged pistons, pics.
  • 2003 mustang gt modded
  • Aug 8, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
364
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 19, 2025
2003 mustang gt modded
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
696
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
502
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
5
Resolved Code 70?? KOEO
  • 5.0-5MT
  • Jun 23, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 6, 2024
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?