• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Lowering Spring Recommendations!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter iaff284
  • Start date Start date Apr 23, 2005
I

iaff284

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
29
0
1
Champaign, IL
Apr 23, 2005
#1
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #1
I need to here from people with KYB gas a just rear and GR-2 fronts. I am looking at the Steeda sport springs. I don't have C/C plates and will be adding offset rack bushings. My 95 GT Vert will see street duty only and I want an aggressive stance. A firm ride does not bother me. Please let me know what you guys think!!!

Thanks
 
1

1hot5.0

Founding Member
Sep 6, 2002
1,615
0
0
Surprise, Arizona
Apr 23, 2005
#2
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #2
If you want an agressive stance, go with the eibach sportlines. I scrape a little every now and then on speedbumps, and some steep driveways, but it's not bad.
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Apr 23, 2005
#3
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #3
I have H&R Super Sports
2 inches in the front
1.6 in the back


 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Apr 23, 2005
#4
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #4
ummm
is 2 inches too much for front ?? You're in Ontario so our roads are similar so did you scrapped your bumper yet ?
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Apr 24, 2005
#5
  • Apr 24, 2005
  • #5
I jsut did the KYB combination and the FMS C-Springs.

I scrape the speed bums at work if I do not go over at an angle and very slow.

The rear is not low enough for the front (the front of my vert lowered a good 1.5" with the C-springs) so in a couple more weeks (1500 miles on it) I'll pull and cut down the rear springs a bit to get teh extra 3/4" or so I need to match heights.

Chris
 

OL' WHITEY

New Member
Jan 28, 2004
273
0
0
Weddington, NC
Apr 25, 2005
#6
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #6
KYB's suck. I've got the GR2's. I don't like them. I wish I had gotten tokikos.
 
S

slytherin

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
702
1
0
northeast ohio
Apr 25, 2005
#7
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #7
IMO The Tokico kit I got off ebay is the best mod I have made to date the adjustablity is greatly appreciated. I am real happy I spent the xtra $.
 

ljinx23

New Member
Dec 10, 2003
163
0
0
Northeast Pennsylvania
Apr 25, 2005
#8
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #8
1hot5.0 said:
If you want an agressive stance, go with the eibach sportlines. I scrape a little every now and then on speedbumps, and some steep driveways, but it's not bad.
Click to expand...

 
I

iaff284

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
29
0
1
Champaign, IL
Apr 25, 2005
#9
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #9
94-302-Vert can you post pics of your ride. When you say level the ride does the rear sit higher than the front. I wont a little rake from front to back.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Apr 25, 2005
#10
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #10
my front tire to wheel well is about 2", in the back it is about 3".

But I want to wait a few more miles before I chop the rear springs to bring the back down a bit just in case it settles in enough with a few more miles on it (the instructions tell you how much to cut for an approximate additional drop).

Chris
 

Attachments

  • PDRM0402b.webp
    59.8 KB · Views: 202

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Apr 25, 2005
#11
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #11
i had eibach prokit on my last mustang, handled alot better and i never scrapped. it dropped it about 1.5 all the way around.

i have the ford c-springs on this car, scrap a bit everyonce in a while. i like the stance from both of them.
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Apr 25, 2005
#12
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #12
TheDamned said:
ummm
is 2 inches too much for front ?? You're in Ontario so our roads are similar so did you scrapped your bumper yet ?
Click to expand...

honestly i wouldn't go any lower than that. I never scrape the bumper, just the skirt and even then I only do it on really bad speed bumps or driveways.
i wouldn't have gotten anything else, these are the springs i wanted.


iaff284 said:
94-302-Vert can you post pics of your ride. When you say level the ride does the rear sit higher than the front. I wont a little rake from front to back.
Click to expand...

I got a 2 inch drop in the front and 1.6 in the rear.
here's a better angle shot
you can see the difference in the wheels... it's also on grass too

 
I

iaff284

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
29
0
1
Champaign, IL
Apr 25, 2005
#13
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #13
Caldwell,

Do you have stock shocks and struts? What about C/C Plates? Are the springs the race set MM has listed on the site for Verts?
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Apr 25, 2005
#14
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #14
iaff284 said:
Caldwell,

Do you have stock shocks and struts? What about C/C Plates? Are the springs the race set MM has listed on the site for Verts?
Click to expand...

I didn't change a thing other than the springs
with the verts there aren't that many springs available.
i only found eibach pro kits, not the sportlines
and only the h&r super sports. not the race springs.
for some reason the verts don't have the spring variety

i wanted sportlines (same drop) but i called the company and they said they aren't made for the verts.
i didn't settle with h&r
i love my springs
 
I

iaff284

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
29
0
1
Champaign, IL
Apr 25, 2005
#15
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #15
Do you remember the part number for the super sports. I looked online and all I could find where the race number for the 1994-95 Verts.

Thanks
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Apr 25, 2005
#16
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #16
iaff284 said:
Do you remember the part number for the super sports. I looked online and all I could find where the race number for the 1994-95 Verts.

Thanks
Click to expand...

I bought my springs on www.tirerack.com

go here:
click this puppy for my results
 
I

iaff284

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
29
0
1
Champaign, IL
Apr 25, 2005
#17
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #17
Cheaper than MM!! Thanks for the help!!
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Apr 25, 2005
#18
  • Apr 25, 2005
  • #18
iaff284 said:
Cheaper than MM!! Thanks for the help!!
Click to expand...

my pleasure
 

50bomber

New Member
Aug 30, 2004
116
0
0
Galvatraz, TX
Apr 27, 2005
#19
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #19
Caldwell said:
i didn't settle with h&r
i love my springs
Click to expand...
Pss.....Fox guy here, about to consider springs.......I wanted to buy the MM Sport springs for my car, but I am worried about destruction of what little ride quality my car has. So, how's the ride after change? How's handling/braking? Were you able to maintain camber w/o CC plates? I live in NJ and our roads are like the dark side of the moon, but with more potholes
,eh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
80
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
234
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
New to me 98 Cobra
  • bird_dog0347
  • Feb 25, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?