• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

M/T Drag Radial Fitment Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter thehueypilot
  • Start date Start date Jun 2, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Jun 7, 2005
#21
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #21
here's the pics of my tires mounted. m/t drag radials 275/50-15, convo pro's 15x8.5 5in b/s. the tires fit great. there are no interference problems anywhere.


 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jun 7, 2005
#22
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #22
paul302 said:
here's the pics of my tires mounted. m/t drag radials 275/50-15, convo pro's 15x8.5 5in b/s. the tires fit great. there are no interference problems anywhere.


Click to expand...


Thnink that sam size would fit on a 66 coupe w/ 15" & 4.5" bs? Or am I relegated to the 255/50/16?

I need some street traction, I'm tured of getting spanked in the first 60'.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 8, 2005
#23
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #23
washMO66 said:
Thnink that sam size would fit on a 66 coupe w/ 15" & 4.5" bs? Or am I relegated to the 255/50/16?

I need some street traction, I'm tured of getting spanked in the first 60'.
Click to expand...
Roller perches man, 6cyl shocks, and 90/10's call it a day. Oh yeah, I don't know how you have gone as fast as you have get some TRACTION BARS !!
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Jun 8, 2005
#24
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #24
What are roller perches
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Jun 8, 2005
#25
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #25
paul302 said:
here's the pics of my tires mounted. m/t drag radials 275/50-15, convo pro's 15x8.5 5in b/s. the tires fit great. there are no interference problems anywhere.

Thanks! Great pictures! They sure don't look like they are 28" diameter tires so 275 does equate to a 28" tall tire right? I guess they are hanging so far down they look smaller compared to the wheel opening. Did you notice the shiney spot on the rear fender well in your picture? Was that from your pervious tires? Have you placed your jack to one side of the rear end and jacked up the car to see it it will hit the bump stop first before the wheel well to simulate a hard launch?
Click to expand...
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Jun 8, 2005
#26
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #26
thehueypilot said:
Thanks! Great pictures! They sure don't look like they are 28" diameter tires so 275 does equate to a 28" tall tire right? I guess they are hanging so far down they look smaller compared to the wheel opening. Did you notice the shiney spot on the rear fender well in your picture? Was that from your pervious tires? Have you placed your jack to one side of the rear end and jacked up the car to see it it will hit the bump stop first before the wheel well to simulate a hard launch?
Click to expand...
the 275-50's are 26" tall. the 275-60's are 28" tall. the car is jacked up by the rear end, so that is the ride height. the shiny spot is just the camera flash.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Jun 8, 2005
#27
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #27
Attached is a hard launch view that shows how far the rear tire moves into the wheel well. I have 26" tires now and they do not rub, but would like to go to 28". It looks like with a better tire another inch will pull the front wheels off the ground and improve my 60' time.
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Jun 8, 2005
#28
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #28
you're squatting an aweful lot. some caltracs or lift bars should help. also, looking at your oil pan, you better keep an eye on your motor mounts.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Jun 8, 2005
#29
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #29
I figured out my confusion........It used to be that a 70 series tire was not as wide as a 60 series which is not as wide as a 50 series and the tires diameter was listed in "American" inches. Now I guess that is an aspect ratio applied to the diameter. I am looking for a 275/60R15 tire?
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Jun 8, 2005
#30
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #30
go here to see the diameter and width of m/t tires: http://www.mickeythompsontires.com/strip_et_street_radial.html
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Jun 8, 2005
#31
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #31
Heres a picture of my stang with 275/60/15 BFG radials, the rims are only 7.5 inches wide But they do fit....They do rub a little bit but i am on 35 year old leaf springs lol, i need to raise my rear end up some either that or stiffin it.



 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 8, 2005
#32
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #32
thehueypilot said:
Attached is a hard launch view that shows how far the rear tire moves into the wheel well. I have 26" tires now and they do not rub, but would like to go to 28". It looks like with a better tire another inch will pull the front wheels off the ground and improve my 60' time.
Click to expand...

Getting a bigger tire, and squating like that will cause you to loose in your 60 ft. Mine used to do that real bad. I used to loose gas out the cap, so I started loosening the neck when I would race and face the thing forward.
By the picture I bet that you spin the first few feet and then hook up pretty good. Some stiff springs will solve that. As the car squats, you have no traction. Not until the cars suspension bottoms out, and plants the wieght, does it grip. Hell, I bet you get that rear to stop squatting and the front will come of the ground.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 8, 2005
#33
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #33
mustangman70 said:
What are roller perches
Click to expand...
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=480075
Traction be thy name !! I PM'd Opentracker and he explained how they work. I will swear up and down now by them. I used to get traction at good tracks and had no problems. But then I moved to where the tracks suck. Now I am the only one I know that hooks and runs fast with stock suspension. There are always the ladder bar, big tired guys that can hook anywhere. But for us normal folk with no tubs,and et streets, full of air...I just can't say enough good things. I am going to do two more things and I am going to end up having to strap the front end down to keep the tires down again.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Jun 8, 2005
#34
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #34
10secgoal said:
Getting a bigger tire, and squating like that will cause you to loose in your 60 ft. Mine used to do that real bad. I used to loose gas out the cap, so I started loosening the neck when I would race and face the thing forward.
By the picture I bet that you spin the first few feet and then hook up pretty good. Some stiff springs will solve that. As the car squats, you have no traction. Not until the cars suspension bottoms out, and plants the wieght, does it grip. Hell, I bet you get that rear to stop squatting and the front will come of the ground.
Click to expand...

I know what you mean because I lose fuel out the back on each run as well and I thought about putting some kind of check valve in it. Why would roller perches keep the front end from coming up? I would think it would allow the front end to raise quicker which would than pull the tires off the ground. I am using the "grab-a-track" leaf springs which I thought were heavy duty?
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jun 8, 2005
#35
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #35
thehueypilot said:
Attached is a hard launch view that shows how far the rear tire moves into the wheel well. I have 26" tires now and they do not rub, but would like to go to 28". It looks like with a better tire another inch will pull the front wheels off the ground and improve my 60' time.
Click to expand...


Your car squats down very low in the rear. What are your leafs?

I run a 5 leaf reverse eye and even on launch my rear end doesn't get much lowere than when it is sitting there. 620lb front coils as well.

try a pic or two
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jun 8, 2005
#36
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #36
another view
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jun 8, 2005
#37
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #37
Pulling the front wheels is not really all that good for your 60'. Proper weight transfer is what we are all after. The reason I can run 1.59 60' times with what I consider a normal size tire (aka, no steamroller) is that 1. - I am launching with no transbrake and at a low RPM (3000-3200) 2. 3:70 gear and the obvious 3. killer motor.

Could they be improved? Yes, but at the sacrifice of streetability and I could not do it with just one change. It would take more tire ultimatley if I start messing with everything else.

my 2 cents
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 8, 2005
#38
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #38
thehueypilot said:
I know what you mean because I lose fuel out the back on each run as well and I thought about putting some kind of check valve in it. Why would roller perches keep the front end from coming up? I would think it would allow the front end to raise quicker which would than pull the tires off the ground. I am using the "grab-a-track" leaf springs which I thought were heavy duty?
Click to expand...

I looked and looked, but I don't see where I said they keep them from coming up. But the stock perched will keep the front down. The springs you have may be stiff " compared to ", but are obviously not up to it the torque coming from that motor. Its hard to transfer wieght correctly when the car squats. When a car does not squat, the back tires become the fulcrum point..like a teeder todder. This puts all the weight on the back tires. When it squats, the new fulcrum point is now moved forward, and your car is in the same position, but not as much actual wieght is on the back tire. Basically any suspension movement is wasted energy, and therefore is wasted time. Such as pulling the wheels. Looks cool, but a waste of time. If it is the only you you hook, then so be it. But if you can lift the front only 2in and hook, the better you will be. So there is a give and take. Transfer as much wieght as needed, no more. Like slicks...if you hook on 15 psi, there is no reason to drop to 8psi. You just make it harder to turn your tires, lose MPH and have the same traction you have before. Same concept as weight transfer.
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Jun 8, 2005
#39
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #39
mustangman70 said:
What are roller perches
Click to expand...








The post about how to make some.
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=480075


John
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jun 8, 2005
#40
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #40
Hey Paul, is that one of those plastic covers for a 9 inch? J/K, what is the rear out of?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Tire Fitment, With Pictures. Post your 10.5 wheel/tire combos
  • 89GTRound2
  • Mar 17, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 15, 2024
ThinBlue502
Wheels-Tires LMR 9" 10 holes
  • EX-SSP
  • Apr 10, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 12, 2020
EX-SSP
S
15" wheels on S197
  • shipbuilder
  • Jul 2, 2018
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
2K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 2, 2018
shipbuilder
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?