MAC cat-back

I have a 96 GT with stock manifolds, BBK offroad H-pipe and 2 chamber flows. Right now the mufflers have been welded into the stock system but I want a true cat-back, and something that is a little louder. I have heard a couple of stangs with the MAC cat-back system, but they all had longtube headers. I was wondering how well the cat-back fits, and if there is any difference in sound compared to the flows.
 
i've had two 98 gt's. on the first one i had welded in flows, & on my last one i had a mac flowpath cat-back. hands down i liked the mac better. i had no fitment problems what so ever. i had the c/b on there before i did l/t's on my last one & it sounded great, but when i did the l/t's it actually quieted it down a bit (at idle anyway :D ), but still sounded great :nice:
 
The best way to describe the Flowpaths is to say they sound almost like a one chamber Flow. They're louder than the 40s, but don't sound as good as the Flows do IMO. If you want to make noise get the Flowpaths, if you want a cleaner, more refined rumble go with the Flows.
 
Volldamort said:
C2, what was the noticable difference between the Flows and MAC muffs? Whas there a power difference as well or just sound? :shrug:


well, i had the two 98's about a year or more apart, so i can't remember exactly how it felt. but i have the next best thing-----track proof :D my 1st 98 ran a 9.6x (1/8th mi) bone stock w/ welded in flows. my last 98 ran a 9.5x with the cat-back. so i think it was a definate difference, since i did a 10th better, & that was a a 1/8th mi track. so i was pretty pleased :nice: