• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Mac Headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 86bluecobra
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2005
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 7, 2005
#1
  • Apr 7, 2005
  • #1
I have a 351w in my 86 stang and was wondering if anyone out there is using mac headers? the reason i ask is i was looking at the flange on them. well there really isnt a flange per say. kinda a individual tube flange for each pipe connecting to the heads. is this a good setup? are there exhaust leak problems because of this design?
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Apr 7, 2005
#2
  • Apr 7, 2005
  • #2
need some help here peeps
 
9

95GTAODE

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
200
2
0
Apr 8, 2005
#3
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #3
Some people have had problems with warping and some haven't. The individual flanges make them easier to install, but if you take them off after they have been on awhile, sometimes you need to use a prybar to get the flanges to line back up with the heads again. Apparently it's a hit or miss type thing.
 
S

ss93cobra

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
1,422
1
0
Wilmington NC
Apr 8, 2005
#4
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #4
95GTAODE said:
Some people have had problems with warping and some haven't. The individual flanges make them easier to install, but if you take them off after they have been on awhile, sometimes you need to use a prybar to get the flanges to line back up with the heads again. Apparently it's a hit or miss type thing.
Click to expand...
My experience with this particular issue is that they need to be persuaded only if going on a different car. Maybe I've just got been lucky though...
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 8, 2005
#5
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #5
I am running this set-up. 351w block with mac shorties in a 90GT. I have found that I have to thread the header bolts in a specific order. If not it will not go together and I will cross thread the bolt into the head. Still it is easier if I pry on the last tube (make this the longest tube) to start the last bolt.
I have had no leaks around the flanges. Even after smoothing down the weld on the inside of the flange.
Come to think of it the 302 headers were pretty good too.
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Apr 8, 2005
#6
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #6
Before the crash, there was a thread on some MAC headers that a guy had for sale on eBay. The guy had nothing but bad things to say about them and he said that they killed gaskets and about every time he took them off, he would have to open up the holes a bit to get them back on because they warped from heat cycling.

Don't have any personal experience, but it does seem possible for that to be a problem.
 
9

91_Mustang

New Member
Apr 3, 2005
2
0
0
New Jersey
Apr 8, 2005
#7
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #7
I have MAC shortys on my 302. i have to use the prybar every time i put them back on, wich is often cause they keep blowing gaskets.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 11, 2005
#8
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #8
I've only had one gasket failure with my headers, and that was because I didn't retorque the bolts after running the motor for a while. Oops!!!
 

OL' WHITEY

New Member
Jan 28, 2004
273
0
0
Weddington, NC
Apr 11, 2005
#9
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #9
30,000 plus miles on my MAC shortys and not one single problem. No leaks, etc. Mine are rusting a little. Juat surface rust. I've never had them back off, so I can't say about taking them off and putting them back on over and over again.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Apr 11, 2005
#10
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #10
i had to use a prybar to get them back on last month after about 5000 miles of use.....they are not any easier to install than the other brands from what ive seen. i would NOT recomend using them just beacause they warp and are a PITA to work with once they have been used
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Apr 11, 2005
#11
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #11
I will have to agree with most here. Nothing but problems from MAC headers.
Due to the problems with lining up the bolts with a pry bar and thin wall tubing, I will never buy their products again.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 11, 2005
#12
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #12
Seems a little harsh 89sleeper. The real question is how do the above mentioned problems compare to other brands of headers, and what is the price difference. I know that when considering perfomance/$ MAC headers are the best deal out there, just a little time consuming to install sometimes. I would recommend learning how to bolt them up properly. For example start with the AFT most bolt and work FWD. Be sure to leave the H-pipe bolts loose, even the ones on the AFT end. This can make a big difference. But if you are taking the headers out frequently, it may be worth a few extra dollars to simplify the process.
Best of Luck!
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Apr 11, 2005
#13
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #13
vristang said:
Seems a little harsh 89sleeper.
Click to expand...
Not really. Seeing as how I used to buy nothing but MAC headers because they were one of the only companies out there that sold headers when I started working on Mustangs about 15 years ago. Now that there are a lot more companies and I have learned from my experiences I would say that it is not harsh. Just a decision made by me from 15 years of working on Mustangs.
 
S

SamSnyder

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
196
0
0
Apr 11, 2005
#14
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #14
I've had Mac unequal lengths on my GT40 heads for 8 or 9 years with no real problems. The warping factor did play when I rebuilt, but a prybar (actually, a barbell bar stuck into each exhaust flange while I stood on the collector) got all the exhaust flanges back to where they were supposed to be. Mine also came with the original nickel plate finish, which I don't know if they're still using, and Foamy Engine Brite cleaner washed that finish off like it was water. But they work OK. I might get them again since they're still about the cheapest out there. Since they've worked OK for so long for me, I couldn't say it would be worth it to spend any more on a shorty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
295
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
642
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
706
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
M
  • Locked
2001 evap core tube support
  • mnky99
  • Sep 4, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
315
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?