• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

mach 1 block vs cobra block

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedDaemon
  • Start date Start date Feb 1, 2006

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#1
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #1
what the heck is the difference between the BLOCKS themselves (lets say 03 mach 1 block vs 03 cobra block)?...not the engines, we all know the difference in performance

is it just a material difference? ive tried looking up specs on each but noone really has anyhting on it, ive been thinking about the mach 1 block as it is cheaper and more readily available than the standard 03 cobra block. if there isnt much of a difference i think im gunna go with the mach 1 block as my foundation...a 4v is a 4v right? (if i can get my project off the ground that is)

if someone has a good website regarding this type of info, please share it with me as i am in the researching phase of my project, thanks!
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Feb 1, 2006
#2
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #2
well besides the fact that the motor for 03-04' mach 1 is an all aluminum block and the 03-04' Cobra is cast iron.....the specs are the same as far as the stroke and bore even down to the 4V's, but the mach 1 C/R is pretty high i believe its 9.8:1 but not entirely sure
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
Seattle, WA
Feb 1, 2006
#3
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #3
If it's just the blocks, the Mach 1 is an aluminum block. The Cobra is an iron block. Mach 1 compression is 10:1.
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#4
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #4
Crzyhrse said:
If it's just the blocks, the Mach 1 is an aluminum block. The Cobra is an iron block. Mach 1 compression is 10:1.
Click to expand...

thanks, thats def a good thing to know itll be a little trickier getting one of those blocks up to performance par with the actual cobra blocks huh? lol itll be just as expensive to do that versus just getting a cobra engine

holy crap, i just noticed ur sig, why is ur dyno so low for ur mach 1? i know a MD is low but wow, shouldnt u be in the low 300's?
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
Seattle, WA
Feb 1, 2006
#5
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #5
-=NightHawk=- said:
thanks, thats def a good thing to know itll be a little trickier getting one of those blocks up to performance par with the actual cobra blocks huh? lol itll be just as expensive to do that versus just getting a cobra engine

holy crap, i just noticed ur sig, why is ur dyno so low for ur mach 1? i know a MD is low but wow, shouldnt u be in the low 300's?
Click to expand...

I've been wanting to take it to some kind of Dyno Day when a Dynojet is being used, but their has'nt been any for a Dynojet in a long time. I'm just curious what the difference in numbers would be. I'm satisfied with the Mustang Dyno numbers. I think on a Dynojet I'd be around 295 HP at the rears, which would almost fall into line with a guy I know with a Mach with pretty much the same mods he's gotten 300 HP and 324 TQ on a Dynojet. I've seen some threads around here with guys who Mustang Dyno their GT's and almost cry at the numbers the Mustang Dyno spits out. About 60 HP less than my numbers.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Feb 1, 2006
#6
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #6
-=NightHawk=- said:
thanks, thats def a good thing to know itll be a little trickier getting one of those blocks up to performance par with the actual cobra blocks huh? lol itll be just as expensive to do that versus just getting a cobra engine
Click to expand...
Are you talking about the "Block" or "Shortblock"(crank/pistons/rods) I'm confused by your posts...If your just getting a bare block then the 03 cobra block will be cheaper since its not aluminum like a Mach block. If your talking shortblock then the 03 Cobra will be more since it has all forged internals. The Mach shortblock has the crappy pistons/rods but if it was a 5 speed Mach will have a forged crank also, automatics will have the cast crank like a gt.

The Mach 1 block is also alot lighter @ 75lbs i think but will not handle as much power as a iron block.
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#7
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #7
oh yea, im not saying its BAD im just sayin that its strange that its SO low. i guess you could average the two once u get ur dynojet results that i think would be a pretty accurate read no?
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
Seattle, WA
Feb 1, 2006
#8
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #8
I really don't have much for mods. A stock 5 speed Mach on a Dynojet at the LOWEST dynos 275 HP. With my Predator and C@L combined, I gained 16 HP. That would put me at 291 on a Dynojet. Not sure what I gained with my Catback and X-pipe, but say I gained just 9 HP, I'm at 300. Wollah. The 300 threshold. Very normal numbers. Every dyno is different, and then you'll have the inevidable, "Numbers don't mean crap, take it to the track" comments. I just took it to a shop I know that afew other Mustang friends recommended, so I had my Mach tuned and Dynoed there twice.
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#9
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #9
droptopponynj said:
Are you talking about the "Block" or "Shortblock"(crank/pistons/rods) I'm confused by your posts...If your just getting a bare block then the 03 cobra block will be cheaper since its not aluminum like a Mach block. If your talking shortblock then the 03 Cobra will be more since it has all forged internals. The Mach shortblock has the crappy pistons/rods but if it was a 5 speed Mach will have a forged crank also, automatics will have the cast crank like a gt.

The Mach 1 block is also alot lighter @ 75lbs i think but will not handle as much power as a iron block.
Click to expand...

hey sry man didnt see ur post

yea, im only talkin about the blocks themselves, no shortblock or anything whatsoever on them/in them

i forgot that the mach blocks were aluminum so they would in nature be more expensive, tho lighter, wouldnt hold as much power, but where does that limit lie? 400rwhp? 800?
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#10
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #10
Crzyhrse said:
I really don't have much for mods. A stock 5 speed Mach on a Dynojet at the LOWEST dynos 275 HP. With my Predator and C@L combined, I gained 16 HP. That would put me at 291 on a Dynojet. Not sure what I gained with my Catback and X-pipe, but say I gained just 9 HP, I'm at 300. Wollah. The 300 threshold. Very normal numbers. Every dyno is different, and then you'll have the inevidable, "Numbers don't mean crap, take it to the track" comments. I just took it to a shop I know that afew other Mustang friends recommended, so I had my Mach tuned and Dynoed there twice.
Click to expand...

i always thought those engines were more powerful than that, somewhere around 305 hp, now that i think about it, itd make sense if that were the case being 305 chp, which would give u that number u have with a few boltons, i think that clears everything up
 

Crzyhrse

Active Member
Dec 23, 2004
0
2
38
Seattle, WA
Feb 1, 2006
#11
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #11
Even with the so-so internals of the Mach, they can support 600 HP, but that's at the extreme. I believe MMFF threw a Procharger on a bone stock Mach and it made 600 HP. They track tested it afew times before it exploded the engine. I think they got it into the low 11's before destruction.
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#12
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #12
damn, thats still impressive
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Feb 1, 2006
#13
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #13
-=NightHawk=- said:
damn, thats still impressive
Click to expand...
not really, same powder rods
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#14
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #14
tomustang said:
not really, same powder rods
Click to expand...
just shoot my dreams down like that

u do have a point...but out of an aluminum block?

600hp is pretty fast dont you think? (its fast enough for me...until i have it )
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Feb 1, 2006
#15
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #15
-=NightHawk=- said:
true...but out of an aluminum block?

600hp is pretty fast dont you think? (its fast enough for me...until i have it )
Click to expand...
doesnt matter, you are limited by power on ALL parts in the block, the rods sucks, the pistons suck, the block and crank doesn't make up for the weak internals
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#16
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #16
who said anything about keepin the internals stock
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#17
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #17
in all seriousness tho

the reason why i inquired is because if i ever came across a mach 1 engine for a good deal, i wanted to know how responsive it is (like the cobra engine is) to mods, in theory if you were to put the same parts on a mach 1 engine that are on an 03 cobra, would it net you the same numbers / what limit does this block have?

if its 600hp then i think thats good enough for me


sorry if i confused u or anyone else tomustang
 
R

RedGTvert

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1999
3,129
1
58
Wellington, FL
Feb 1, 2006
#18
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #18
If your talking about the raw block, it will withstand quite a bit more than 600hp. Now if you want an Aluminum block that can really withstand some power, look for a 96-98 Teksid block, there are guys running 1400rwhp on them.
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Feb 1, 2006
#19
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #19
RedGTvert said:
If your talking about the raw block, it will withstand quite a bit more than 600hp. Now if you want an Aluminum block that can really withstand some power, look for a 96-98 Teksid block, there are guys running 1400rwhp on them.
Click to expand...

yeah theyre awesome but theyre expensive, 600-700rwhp is all ill really ever need since anything more is pushing whats streetable and what isnt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
F
Cobra & Mach 1
  • Fri Guy
  • Nov 3, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2023
Monkeybutt2000
M
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 3:20 PM
GearHeadGuy
Engine Ron Francis aka The Detail Zone and their Ford harnesses are beyond poor quality.Here's why.
  • CAMTWO1070
  • Oct 20, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 13, 2022
CAMTWO1070
For Sale 97 Cobra with built 99 cobra drivetrain
  • AvalancheSVT
  • May 14, 2022
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
3
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 22, 2022
AvalancheSVT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?