• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech

Mach 480 Sound Opinions

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2000_Stang_
  • Start date Start date Jul 15, 2004
2

2000_Stang_

New Member
Jul 13, 2004
9
0
0
Jul 15, 2004
#1
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #1
Mach 460 Sound Opinions

Just A Curiosity On What You All Think Of The Sound System Some Of Us Have In Our Stangs !

Personally For A System That Comes Stock In Some Of Our Rides, Dont Sound Bad At All To Me !

And Before Ya'll Get Carried Away With Your Subs And Amps And What Nots. I Am Just Curious On What The Peeps With The Mach 480 Think Of It !
 

stang976

New Member
Apr 13, 2004
853
0
0
Westchester, NY
Jul 15, 2004
#2
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #2
i never new there was a mach 480 sound system... i thought it waas only 460 and 1000's
 
2

2000_Stang_

New Member
Jul 13, 2004
9
0
0
Jul 15, 2004
#3
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #3
OMG WOW OOPS ... MAJOR TYPO ... I MEANT 460 ! UGH !
 

ChrisYellowV6

New Member
Dec 25, 2003
362
0
0
Pensacola, FL
Jul 15, 2004
#4
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #4
you in a coupe or vert? The sound is totally different between the two...on the coupe you have your two rear woofers back by the glass, on the vert they are right behind the driver/passangers seats. I have had both, and it sounds a lot better in the vert. I like it, but I think it's overpriced. I have added 1 10" sub to my setup, it evens it out nicely.

For the money you would spend on buying a 460 you can buy a somewhat decent quality aftermarket system, unless you're getting a new car then get it, because ford is making it std now.

however its a pain in the butt to do any work on. headunit (on the 99+) is a non-amplified output, goes to 2 amps in the back and so you cant put an amplified headunit in there.
 

seekjohn

New Member
Apr 7, 2004
23
0
0
Ontario Canada
Jul 15, 2004
#5
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #5
mach 460 custom

my stang started out as a v6 stock system but i really wanted to put aftermarket speakers deck and subs in so i bought the front tweeter holders/grills and the rear decklid for the 460 system. I custom fit an alpine type s coaxial set into the door tweeter spot. I also made a custom sub holder that fits in the wheelwell and an ampboard that bolts up behind the rear seats. I like the sound of the 460 system but like most i like my stang to be unique. In the end the uniqueness cost about 500 bucks plus stereo equipment, but it was worth it to me.
 

Ghostalker

Member
Jul 5, 2003
184
0
16
Danbury, CT
Jul 15, 2004
#6
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #6
The stock sound was good, but i put two alpine speakers in the rea deck of my 95' coupe... i have an amp im going to hook them up too, oh yeah =D
its my brothers old amp he was using for his alpine sub, (although its also used for speakers) so i can use it in my set (he just bought a larger amp from Sony)
 

necrolyte

Founding Member
Jun 8, 2002
271
0
0
Lewisville,Tx
Jul 17, 2004
#7
  • Jul 17, 2004
  • #7
i have never had the full mach system in it. i have always had a different head unit in it. but the speakers were mach 460 and they sounded great. but i just recently put focal speakers up front, eclipse 5x7s in the back pushed by a JL audio amp (already had an eclipse head unit) and it sounds so much better. i would go aftermarket if i were you instead of buying the mach system if thats what you are looking for
 

marvinmycat

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2002
1,179
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Jul 17, 2004
#8
  • Jul 17, 2004
  • #8
Not to mention there is no imaging coming from the rear in the stock setups (M460).
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,258
17,942
224
Massachusetts
Jul 17, 2004
#9
  • Jul 17, 2004
  • #9
For a stock setup, i like the Mach 460. It's enough of a system for me to keep me happy. It came standard with my car so i didn't have much of an option. But i got the newer better-looking 6-disk changer headunit. It has some cool features and it's gotta a pretty good kick to it.

I have no desire to change the stereo at all, more money for mods instead
 

zincyellow03

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
0
0
0
My dead ho likes Chicago
Jul 17, 2004
#10
  • Jul 17, 2004
  • #10
I think the system is fine how it is...and it doesn't look out of place in you stang like some of the other after market ones...
 
P

Pitch Black

New Member
Jul 17, 2004
369
0
0
TX
Jul 18, 2004
#11
  • Jul 18, 2004
  • #11
I've got the Mach 1000 and have been told it's not only the best sounding factory system, but better than most aftermarket setups. It kicks ass!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
190
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
PCV system help for S/C
  • jay99914
  • Feb 16, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
652
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2025
jay99914
J
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
T
Need advice: 93 Cobra audio upgrade with no permanent modifications
  • THNX SVT
  • Feb 18, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2024
TIGGER
L
2003 New Edge Mach 460 question.
  • LightSkinMocha
  • Jul 6, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 27, 2023
Ranger
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?