• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Made the switch to Royal Purple today...

  • Thread starter Thread starter jefferz
  • Start date Start date Mar 15, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
J

jefferz

Member
Oct 21, 2004
110
1
19
Spokane, WA
Mar 15, 2008
#1
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #1
and must say I am impressed!

It was also my first time doing an oil change by myself. made a big mess with the old oil but oh well!


I'm pretty happy with it. I took it out for a quick test drive and it felt a little different. This is my first time using synthetic.

Ironically it also just hit 35,000 today too.

I'm pretty happy with the results.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Mar 15, 2008
#2
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #2
i feel sorry for your car. RP isnt all its cracked up to be.
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Mar 15, 2008
#3
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #3
bdcardinal said:
i feel sorry for your car. RP isnt all its cracked up to be.
Click to expand...

i dunno dude i put mobil 1 in my car today and i def like the rp better. the only reason why i went with mobil 1 is they didnt have any rp at advanced and i go back to school tomorrow so i didnt want to wait. its good stuff man some may not like it but some do.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Mar 15, 2008
#4
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #4
the VOAs for RP are kinda scary. i dont use Mobil 1 anymore, i only use German Castrol 0w30.

ive read numerous threads of motors that tanked because of RP.
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Mar 15, 2008
#5
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #5
bdcardinal said:
the VOAs for RP are kinda scary. i dont use Mobil 1 anymore, i only use German Castrol 0w30.

ive read numerous threads of motors that tanked because of RP.
Click to expand...

yea but you cant necessarily blame the oil either. Ive heard of cars blowing motors running mobil 1 too. its amazing what statistics can show. of all the cars in the world running royal purple how many have had problems?
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Mar 15, 2008
#6
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #6
Mobil 1 FTW! The engineers on my ship were telling me about how much cleaner the valves and everything stayed on the engines when they were using mobil 1. He said the company made them switch to chevron oil and now there is way more sludge and carbon buildup.

This is coming from a guy with a masters in marine engineering...I made the switch to mobil 1 and havent looked back.
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Mar 15, 2008
#7
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #7
I loved RP, but I like amsoil more. And I have tried all the big names.

My picks are
#1 amsoil
#2 RP
#3 Mobil 1

In that order
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Mar 15, 2008
#8
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #8
enyawix said:
I loved RP, but I like amsoil more. And I have tried all the big names.

My picks are
#1 amsoil
#2 RP
#3 Mobil 1

In that order
Click to expand...

yea ive never tried amsoil really good but that would def be up there in those choices cause i know amsoil is really good stuff too.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Mar 15, 2008
#9
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #9
if you prefer an oil based on how you perceive it to be working in your daily-driven engine then you need a cat scan. I don't mean to sound pretentious, but im tired of these threads where people recommend oils with out doing tests or looking at the results inside the components after extended periods of time.

If you want to feel a difference right away switch from running cooking oil to any engine oil, otherwise it's all in your head. Things you should notice are viscosity grade on cold or hot days, and color/smell after running the engine very hot comparing mineral to synthetic. General feelings of "good" "not good" leave me scratching my head
 

Skidawg

Member
Nov 11, 2003
104
0
16
Mar 15, 2008
#10
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #10
Being happy with the results, whatever they are, is all that matters.

People get a little worked up about oils around here.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Mar 15, 2008
#11
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #11
Skidawg said:
Being happy with the results, whatever they are, is all that matters.

People get a little worked up about oils around here.
Click to expand...

i suppose so
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Mar 15, 2008
#12
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #12
CobraRed_96_GT said:
if you prefer an oil based on how you perceive it to be working in your daily-driven engine then you need a cat scan. I don't mean to sound pretentious, but im tired of these threads where people recommend oils with out doing tests or looking at the results inside the components after extended periods of time.

If you want to feel a difference right away switch from running cooking oil to any engine oil, otherwise it's all in your head. Things you should notice are viscosity grade on cold or hot days, and color/smell after running the engine very hot comparing mineral to synthetic. General feelings of "good" "not good" leave me scratching my head
Click to expand...

I recommend oils based on "MY" dyno numbers and track times. Unless you are clueless you can tell when your engine sounds good. I could hear I had more power! My 347 made 17MPG at over wheel 400HP. Do not label us as stupid. I built the 347 and the 351 in my sig. I call 3hp at the wheels from oil a BIG deal. Turbo engines tend to punish oil, but Amsoil RP hold up and go the distance.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Mar 15, 2008
#13
  • Mar 15, 2008
  • #13
not calling you guys stupid, just saying you'll find whatever you want to find with oils. What works for your app based on what you see as results is not externally valid, i see way too many blanket recommendations based on little more than a hunch. And my guess is RP gets 80% of its business from this, cuz its certainly not from analytical data tests

I worked for Royal Petroleum for 3 years and many of the owners and bosses worked with or around John Williams during his hay-day, master of marketing and proprietary "secrets" yes, but what's produced today they wouldn't want to be compared in USE tests against most any major manufacturer on the market.
 

MaxedGT

Member
Mar 31, 2005
304
0
17
Surrey BC Canada
Mar 16, 2008
#14
  • Mar 16, 2008
  • #14
My car always runs way better after I wash it!
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Mar 16, 2008
#15
  • Mar 16, 2008
  • #15
MaxedGT said:
My car always runs way better after I wash it!
Click to expand...

depends on the paint, white must be the lightest!
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Mar 16, 2008
#16
  • Mar 16, 2008
  • #16
MaxedGT said:
My car always runs way better after I wash it!
Click to expand...

with your et I would not talk any trash. when you get deep into the 11s I will value what you say.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Mar 16, 2008
#17
  • Mar 16, 2008
  • #17
enyawix said:
with your et I would not talk any trash. when you get deep into the 11s I will value what you say.
Click to expand...

what are these ETs you speak of? they dont require brakes or turning do they?
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Mar 16, 2008
#18
  • Mar 16, 2008
  • #18
enyawix said:
with your et I would not talk any trash. when you get deep into the 11s I will value what you say.
Click to expand...

13.497 is pretty good if you ask me
 
D

darkside03gt

Member
Feb 19, 2007
851
8
18
Sacramento CA
Mar 16, 2008
#19
  • Mar 16, 2008
  • #19
enyawix said:
with your et I would not talk any trash. when you get deep into the 11s I will value what you say.
Click to expand...

the guy was just being a funny. I dont think that a response like that is really warrented. and after having serious issues running RP in my tranny I will never run that stuff again. And i will value what you say ummm well, NEVER.
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Mar 16, 2008
#20
  • Mar 16, 2008
  • #20
I've got almost 195,000 miles on my trans with RP Syncromesh in it since about 40,000...it can't be that bad
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
369
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
418
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
563
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
O
injectors keeping up?
  • optionizerSS
  • Apr 4, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
297
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
optionizerSS
O
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
893
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?