• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Maf Type?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bayellowstang
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2014
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Jan 14, 2014
#1
  • Jan 14, 2014
  • #1
Hi guys, it's been a while since I have been on here posting anything. I have been enjoying the car not being broke. Now I am getting ready to start a turbo install and have a few questions.

Is there a way to tell if a MAF is a blow-thru? I have a PRO-M 80mm. It is just a big open hole with no sensor showing.

My other question is are all aftermarket fuel pressure regulators boost referencing?
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Jan 14, 2014
#2
  • Jan 14, 2014
  • #2
its a draw thru
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Jan 14, 2014
#3
  • Jan 14, 2014
  • #3
If you tune with the wideband, it doesn't make a bit of difference which it is (blowthrough or drawthrough). I've been running a drawthrough ("regular") PRO-M MAF for several years now on my turbo '95 without any issues whatsoever. I think it only really matters if you're counting on its calibration to be spot-on for your injectors on a naturally aspirated combo. Since your turbo will need to be tuned, you can run whichever you want as a blowthrough (assuming that's what you're doing since it's the most common). I don't believe there's any physical difference between the two -- though you'll want to make sure your housing can handle the pressures you're looking to make. Probably zero concern at 10psi, the practical max for a stock-block.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,878
21,056
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 14, 2014
#4
  • Jan 14, 2014
  • #4
The only physical difference is that blow-through elements are designed specifically for the heat ranges associated with turbos or SCs.

MAF elements operate by heat. As the air blows past the element, it varies the resistance of that element. That in turn, is read as a signal for the EEC to use in calculating how much air is flowing through the housing.

Draw through elements tend to be more accurate at low throttle settings. The resolution of the meter is higher. I have seen what I consider to be exceptions. There are however, draw through style MAFs that can be "pegged" by the heat generated from a power adder. PRO-M and a few other manufacturers anticipate these kinds of conditions and leave enough room to handle the additional temps.

Were it my build, I would buy a quality draw-through piece like jozefsz has done. The two key factors in a MAF for a street car are resolution, and consistency. Pro-M has a a great reputation for both. There are other vendors as well. Shop carefully.


On the fuel regulator... I can't think of a single reason why it would need to be able to reference boost. Are you thinking of a Fuel Management Unit (FMU)?
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Jan 14, 2014
#5
  • Jan 14, 2014
  • #5
Thanks for the input guys. I figured it was a draw through. I think I am going to go with one of the new PMAS MAF's that has the IAT sensor built into it. That way I can kill 2 birds with one stone and not have to install the IAT sensor in the intake runner.

As for the fuel regulator, everything I have been reading says that it should reference boost and add 1PSI of fuel for each PSI boost. I talked to the kit maufacture and he said the same thing. He also said the stock regulator will handle around 10# of boost and be good for 600hp so I may replace the aftermarket one I have with a new stock replacement. No need for adjustable anyways since I tune it myself.
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Jan 15, 2014
#6
  • Jan 15, 2014
  • #6
The integrated IAT's are nice, personally I like to keep it separate as those are known to fail (and a lot cheaper to replace as a separate unit). If you're installing a kit it probably has the IAT provisions already so you'll end up needing to plug it and also go with a different pigtail for the MAF itself. So that sounds like more hassle to me.

You're right that all vacuum-operated fuel pressure regulators will "reference boost" to a degree. Noobz is right, that term usually doesn't mean too much outside of the FMU world. Theoretically however much boost you make will increase your pressure the same amount to overcome the resistance the fuel injectors now feel (and likewise when you're drawing vacuum decreasing the pressure at the rail). Took me a while to realize vacuum is inHG while boost is typically PSI, so up from 0 (at boost) you'll see 1:1, down from 0 (at vacuum) you'll see a smaller pressure decrease for each inHG of vacuum (but still 1:1 when using psi for both measures).

Personally I'd get a good quality adjustable -- while the diaphragm in the stock unit can probably handle up to 10psi ok, I think it's a pretty weak little unit and if you pop the diaphragm at full boost you'll see a sudden drop in fuel pressure which could be catastrophic. You're right that you shouldn't ever need to use it (though I'm using it to cheat my injectors up a size by running a higher pressure at the rail which you could do too once you realize even 10psi isn't enough! -- FYI your signature says 30lb injectors, that's not going to be nearly enough for 10psi... I'm cheating my 36lb'ers Bosch 4-pin injectors up to 42 running at 55psi which is just about right for 10psi.).

When you get around to tuning, you're welcomed to my tune. 42lb injectors, 10psi, PRO-M MAF, otherwise largely stock. You'll want to tune for up to 200% load and have full-boost AFR's in the high 10's or low 11's. And lots of other stuff you're welcomed to.
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Mar 18, 2014
#7
  • Mar 18, 2014
  • #7
Well I finally started it Saturday.

I bought 60lb injectors for future use.

I would love to look at your tune. I tuned it with the 30's and new heads and everything but I'm a little nervous tuning with boost. I have a 6lb spring in the wastegate, I don't want to risk breaking anything.

I still need to get a boost gauge and some one way check valves for the evap can and the brake booster.

Thanks for all the info.
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Mar 18, 2014
#8
  • Mar 18, 2014
  • #8
The first thing I would get is a wideband controller. At the end of the day, it's all about AFR's not fuel pressure. See here .
 

jozsefsz

15 Year Member
Aug 11, 2013
1,243
332
124
Cleveland OH Area
Mar 19, 2014
#9
  • Mar 19, 2014
  • #9
Sent my tune to you for your inspection. There are a few areas to change a little bit for boost but it's nothing too bad at all.
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Mar 19, 2014
#10
  • Mar 19, 2014
  • #10
Along with the turbo I finally installed my LC-1 wideband too. I geuss I need to update my sig now. LOL
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Mar 19, 2014
#11
  • Mar 19, 2014
  • #11
i see no sig...
 
B

bayellowstang

Member
Apr 25, 2003
462
0
17
Carlisle, PA
Mar 19, 2014
#12
  • Mar 19, 2014
  • #12
madspeed said:
i see no sig...
Click to expand...
HMM that's weird. I know I have one set up, I just edited it. I don't see it either.

I need to get a pipe made to split the 3.5" into dual 2.5" pipes then to my cat back. I could probably not run mufflers as quiet as it is with just the down-pipe but it will be nice for it to be quieter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
248
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
Engine 95 GT and 95 Cobra sensors and TB gasket
  • Sonic
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
299
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 23, 2025
WhiteCobra95
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
210
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
561
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
9
New from northern MN
  • 91firecracker
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
93
The Welcome Wagon Apr 19, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?