• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

matching an intake with AFR heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter projectstang
  • Start date Start date Jun 6, 2004
P

projectstang

New Member
Apr 14, 2004
99
0
0
Jun 6, 2004
#1
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #1
I am thinking about getting some new AFR heads for my windsor, but AFR doesn't make an intake to match up with any of them. Would it be ok to use an Performer RPM intake and the cam kit that's sold with it, or is there a better intake to use with AFRs???
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
Jun 6, 2004
#2
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #2
rpm, airgap rpm or stealth will all work good..
 
P

projectstang

New Member
Apr 14, 2004
99
0
0
Jun 6, 2004
#3
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #3
sorry, I shoulda said this earlier. I can't cut the hood at all 'cuz it's a sleeper, so it won't work to have a REAL tall intake. Also I have an Edelbrock 750 carb. I don't know if that makes any diff. thanks for th help, though! any other ideas?
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 6, 2004
#4
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #4
what do you mean that an intake wont match up with the heads? You mean the ports? the bolts? what?
 
P

projectstang

New Member
Apr 14, 2004
99
0
0
Jun 6, 2004
#5
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #5
I just mean for the most power. I've heard that using components built by the same manufacturer work better together (to get power, gas mileage, torque, etc.) than mixing and matching parts from 4 or 5 or 6 different builders. maybe this isn't the case. I've heard that AFR's are good heads for a street car and that Edelbrock makes a good intake for the windsor. I just don't know if it would be very smart to mix the 2.
 

SandSprite

Member
Feb 8, 2003
332
0
16
L.A., CA
Jun 6, 2004
#6
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #6
Last time I checked, AFR doesn't make intakes, so what are you going to do? The AFR's are one of the best heads out there (better than the edelbrocks). It's all about mixing and matching correctly.

Both the Edelbrock Performer RPM and the Weiand Stealth are good dual plane intakes that can fit under a stock hood (depending on your choice of air cleaner and possibly motor mounts).
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jun 6, 2004
#7
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #7
It is key to match the components, but that doesn't mean the manufacturer must be the same.

An engine can be a stump puller, a high rpm screamer, or something in between. If your intake and carb are for high rpms, a stump puller cam isn't a good idea. So you want to match the designed rpm ranges.

Edit: I don't see what motor you have, but a 750 cfm carb is pretty big unless you have a big block or a pretty high rpm motor.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 6, 2004
#8
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #8
check out the intake combos on the AFR site too
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Jun 6, 2004
#9
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #9
I have tried the air gap, performer rpm and the victor jr. The air gap and victor jr. are too tall for a stock hood. I don't know of any intake that matches port size with AFR heads. I am still battling the victor jr. and I am thinking about going back to the performer RPM.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jun 6, 2004
#10
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #10
the victor will work on a 302 with a 1" drop base air cleaner...like the cobra Oval style or a few offered from edelbrock...ask 2BaV8. If this is a 351w....huey is right.

I have a performer RPM intake for a 302. PM ME If interested.
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Jun 6, 2004
#11
  • Jun 6, 2004
  • #11
the victor will work on a 302 with a 1" drop base air cleaner...like the cobra Oval style or a few offered from edelbrock...ask 2BaV8. If this is a 351w
Click to expand...

Yup, that's the setup I use.

Of course a 351W is taller.
Time to get a hood scoop
 
P

projectstang

New Member
Apr 14, 2004
99
0
0
Jun 7, 2004
#12
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #12
thehueypilot said:
I have tried the air gap, performer rpm and the victor jr. The air gap and victor jr. are too tall for a stock hood. I don't know of any intake that matches port size with AFR heads. I am still battling the victor jr. and I am thinking about going back to the performer RPM.
Click to expand...

so the only one short enough is the performer rpm and the port sizes don't match up??that sucks!! could i gain any extra room if I made my mach 1 scoop functional?? it's a pretty small scoop (compared to the huge Boss scoop) so I don't know if there would be room. but if that worked, would that gain me an extra inch or so??
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 7, 2004
#13
  • Jun 7, 2004
  • #13
If you run AFR 185 you can port match them. Or you can gasket match them like I did. Be prepared to spend some time on them though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
152
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 8:21 AM
James S
J
K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
90
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
Engine Felpro 9333 pt1 (with 8psi boost)
  • JD1964
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
741
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
K
Resolved Weird sound coming from a freshly rebuilt 5.0L
  • karhoot
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
192
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2026
Mac131
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
517
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?