• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Max HP of 42# injectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KBCobra95
  • Start date Start date Aug 6, 2006

KBCobra95

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
356
0
0
North Carolina
Aug 6, 2006
#1
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #1
I have a set on my car and my tuner said that they are maxed out (484 whp 496 wtq) I thought the 42's were good to 550 whp?I'm still running my stock fuel rails. Would changing the rails help any? He recommended 60#'s but I don't know. Please Help!!!
 

KBCobra95

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
356
0
0
North Carolina
Aug 6, 2006
#2
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #2
TTT
 

gmkillr

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
606
1
18
Aug 6, 2006
#3
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #3
Id have to say you are pushing the 42's to their limit, they are probably pretty close to 100% cycle duty. There are calculator's online that can tell you this.
Id say jump to the 60's too. Check out Anderson's site, I believe they have them on sale pretty cheap. You are always better to tune an injector down than to try and tune a smaller one up. Good luck!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 6, 2006
#4
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #4
A VERY good Q

I think the CORRECT answer is difficult, at best, to find

I've been on these boards since around the time our cars were made.

Over the years, I've seen peeps continue to go larger and larger with inj size choice.

IMHO peeps have always tended to get by with too small of a choice.

One thing you see all the time is someone saying ... so many hp can be supported with such & such size inj. The hose up there is ... most of the time ... those hp values are fwhp & NOT rwhp.

What if the guy is runnin an auto trans? ... all the more error

anyway ......

Over the last couple years, I've really seen a rapid change to larger size inj's.

I think it is due to more and more peeps have the ability to gather data which shows the need.

Not all that long ago ... forced combos were good to go with 42's.

These days, you see more and more going for inj's in the 50/60 sizes.

From many things I've seen, hp alone is not enough of a criteria to use in making size choice.

IMHO, This is one of those rare times in life that one could say ......

"I'd rather be Fat ...... than Lean"

Grady
 

gmkillr

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
606
1
18
Aug 6, 2006
#5
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #5
 

Therian

The Highlander
Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
0
1
0
Waterloo, Ontario
Aug 6, 2006
#6
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #6
Grady makes excellent points as per usual. Another thing the fuel injector calculators don't take into consideration is how far you will be revving the engine. the more rpms, the more air, the more air, the more fuel.

for instance...Jay Allen recommended I use #50 + injectors on a 7500 rpm application...Naturally Aspirated!
 

KBCobra95

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
356
0
0
North Carolina
Aug 6, 2006
#7
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #7
Thanks Guys! Next question: Would 60's be enough to support around 650-700 HP? The reason I ask is My next comboe is going to be a dart 331 with AFR 205 heads with high boost and maybe some giggle gas. Thanks!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 6, 2006
#8
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #8
KBCobra95 said:
Thanks Guys! Next question: Would 60's be enough to support around 650-700 HP? The reason I ask is My next comboe is going to be a dart 331 with AFR 205 heads with high boost and maybe some giggle gas. Thanks!
Click to expand...

I'd be wanting to talk to peeps who have done what you propose to do.

Maybe check out some forced combo forums or look around Hardcore.

Grady
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Aug 6, 2006
#9
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #9
I made around 550rw with 42s and 590rw with meth.

I would say 540ish rw give or take is about their max.
Your not only running outta inj but your running outta volume i.e lines/rails

I runs 60s now, and they are good to about 650rw

Chris
 
3

358stroker

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2001
62
0
0
Austin, TX
Aug 6, 2006
#10
  • Aug 6, 2006
  • #10
I made 490 at the tires on a mustang dyno with 50's, duty cycle was only 70%.
Stock feed/return lines until engine compartment, then -6 feed lines to vortech fuel rails, 255in tank, 255 inline. I think I could make more power and be OK with the stock lines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
264
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
C
Boosted Boss 302 HP/TQ
  • coltoncaskey12
  • May 24, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
100
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech May 24, 2026
coltoncaskey12
C
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
937
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
S
Need help and Advise - 89 Problem Child
  • Sheela
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
157
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2025
evintho
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?