• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox MGW shifter handles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91GTstroked
  • Start date Start date Dec 1, 2019

91GTstroked

15 Year Member
Jun 14, 2007
514
284
93
Dec 1, 2019
#1
  • Dec 1, 2019
  • #1
Hey guys,

I'm looking at upgrading my shifter. I'll double check what I actually have, but per the previous owners mod list I have a old Hurst shifter with a triax handle.

I'm familiar with the MGW shifters, but not sure what handle to go with?

Options:
-Race
-Comfort
-Standard

I'm leaning towards the comfort or standard one as I basically use the car for cruising. Nothing serious.

Just not sure between the two.

Thank you.
 
J

junkyardwarrior

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
400
113
63
Dec 1, 2019
#2
  • Dec 1, 2019
  • #2
The race handle is a little shorter, and thus increases the effort needed to shift. I didn't care for it. Ended up with the comfort handle which is a little easier to shift, easier to reach, easier drive on a daily basis, at least for me. My buddy's fox body has a "standard" handle which is sorta between the two; leaning more toward "race". I like the comfort better for what I use it for. If I had a race car, it wouldn't be with a T5 and putting a race handle on one that isn't dogring'd would be a waste, IMO. Prefer Liberty but I'm out of that game now.
 
Reactions: 91GTstroked

91GTstroked

15 Year Member
Jun 14, 2007
514
284
93
Dec 1, 2019
#3
  • Dec 1, 2019
  • #3
junkyardwarrior said:
The race handle is a little shorter, and thus increases the effort needed to shift. I didn't care for it. Ended up with the comfort handle which is a little easier to shift, easier to reach, easier drive on a daily basis, at least for me. My buddy's fox body has a "standard" handle which is sorta between the two; leaning more toward "race". I like the comfort better for what I use it for. If I had a race car, it wouldn't be with a T5 and putting a race handle on one that isn't dogring'd would be a waste, IMO. Prefer Liberty but I'm out of that game now.
Click to expand...


Thank you for your feedback. I was leaning towards the comfort handle. You just confirmed my decision.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,346
18,081
224
Massachusetts
Dec 2, 2019
#4
  • Dec 2, 2019
  • #4
I actually like the standard handle. My car is just a cruiser, and I liked the shorter throw.

I did buy a race handle just to try it out, but it's sitting on my shelf at the moment
 
Reactions: 91GTstroked
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
802
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 9, 2026
squeak93
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
483
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
978
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
2K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Aug 26, 2026
X-cam34
X
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?