• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Mid Pipe

  • Thread starter Thread starter RangerJoe
  • Start date Start date Nov 30, 2013

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Nov 30, 2013
#1
  • Nov 30, 2013
  • #1
I'm getting ready to install my 1 3/4" long tube Mac headers. I currently have the BBK X-pipe for shorty headers. I've read that the Mac headers will not bolt up to some mid pipes, like the BBK x-pipe for long tubes. I had a pro chamber on order, but then it was cancelled due to it being over 4 weeks on back order. So, does anyone have any experience with Mac long tubes and a mid pipe. What did you guys use? I would prefer an x-pipe over h-pipe. My other thought is to bolt them on and have a connector piece welded in to make my current x-pipe work.

Joe
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Nov 30, 2013
#2
  • Nov 30, 2013
  • #2
I'd go with the connector piece. I've seen a few like that. I've never ran long tubes but have heard this is a common occurrence. If your current pipe is good I'd just weld an extensions
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Nov 30, 2013
#3
  • Nov 30, 2013
  • #3
Huh, arent the mid pipes made for either shorties or longtubes? Why would it not fit?
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Nov 30, 2013
#4
  • Nov 30, 2013
  • #4
madspeed said:
Huh, arent the mid pipes made for either shorties or longtubes? Why would it not fit?
Click to expand...

I've read several post where certain brands didn't match up with other brands. Bbk was one of those. I also noticed that the summit brand is BBK long tube specific. I think I even read a few post claiming that the mac headers were specific. They do make them for auto and manual cars, so something is different.

Joe
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Nov 30, 2013
#5
  • Nov 30, 2013
  • #5
Auto and manual headers are different. Automatic trannys are wider, but the mid pipes dont give a sheit as the collectors are in the same spot
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Nov 30, 2013
#6
  • Nov 30, 2013
  • #6
If you look at mac products, even the mid pipes are trans specific. That tells me that the collectors are possibly not in the same spot. Headers and mid pipes are both trans specific.

Joe
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 1, 2013
#7
  • Dec 1, 2013
  • #7
I did a set of BBK 1519s with a BBK X-pipe recently, and I had to use a ratchet strap to pull the midpipe in a little to get it to fit.

I assume this is a manual foxbody header from BBK? That is what I run on my SN Mustang. Those BBK 1 and 3/4 headers fit really well. They do come in very tight to the transmission on the driver's side. More so then the other brands. The header also angles towards the transmission with a funny angle. I ended up having to hack of the inlet tubes to my ProChamber and rebuilding them from scratch. No amount of bending was going to make it work with that funny angle.

Kurt
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Dec 1, 2013
#8
  • Dec 1, 2013
  • #8
Well i guess even us older stangnetters can still learn something new!
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 1, 2013
#9
  • Dec 1, 2013
  • #9
This is what I had to do. I used prebent mandrel sections from Jegs. I always sleeve weld for durability and longevity.







You can see the funny angle I had to put in on the driver's side.

Kurt
 

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Dec 1, 2013
#10
  • Dec 1, 2013
  • #10
I can dig it!
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Dec 1, 2013
#11
  • Dec 1, 2013
  • #11
I may just modify my x-pipe. Probably cheaper too.

Joe
 
Reactions: A5literMan

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 2, 2013
#12
  • Dec 2, 2013
  • #12
It's not that it's cheaper; I just find that if you buy another X-pipe that is supposed to fit, you just end up modifying that one. With the BBK 1 and 3/4" headers, make sure you get or reuse a 2 1/2" socket joint. It claims to use a 3" collector, but a 3" socket joint is too big, and won't work.

Kurt
 

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
Dec 2, 2013
#13
  • Dec 2, 2013
  • #13
One would think after 20yrs, along with todays advancements in tech, the term direct fit would be better utilized in exhaust.
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Dec 2, 2013
#14
  • Dec 2, 2013
  • #14
revhead347 said:
It's not that it's cheaper; I just find that if you buy another X-pipe that is supposed to fit, you just end up modifying that one. With the BBK 1 and 3/4" headers, make sure you get or reuse a 2 1/2" socket joint. It claims to use a 3" collector, but a 3" socket joint is too big, and won't work.

Kurt
Click to expand...

Wasn't bashing your efforts, I like cheaper, if it is not sacrificing quality. FYI, I am going to be running 1 3/4 Macs, and the collector is definitely 3". Looks I will be buying a 3" to 2.5" adapter anyways, so welding will happen one way or the other.

Joe
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Mid Pipe
  • 93gtmustang
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
239
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 21, 2025
Mustang5L5
R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
293
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
Fox BBK X-pipe replacement Cat?
  • TIGGER
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
253
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
224
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
Fox 329 HP low for a stroker?
  • Andresquintana.mma
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 19, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?