• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Mikes Tip For The Day. Adding A Cobra Brake Booster.

  • Thread starter Thread starter CarMichael Angelo
  • Start date Start date Apr 25, 2017
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,085
21,268
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 26, 2017
#21
  • Apr 26, 2017
  • #21
How did/does brake-lock feel?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Apr 26, 2017
#22
  • Apr 26, 2017
  • #22
TOOLOW91 said:
I think they were tighter until mid 89 . I'm not sure if that's confirmed though.
Click to expand...

Jeff- you are on fire dude
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,483
8,687
234
S.I.NY
Apr 26, 2017
#23
  • Apr 26, 2017
  • #23
mikestang63 said:
Jeff- you are on fire dude
Click to expand...
Oh you know once I realized what I did in the first post I had to run with it !
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Apr 26, 2017
#24
  • Apr 26, 2017
  • #24
maybe i'm missing something? just cause it bolts in, doesn't mean it has the right amount of assist for a cobra master/caliper/disc setup. hell, my stock 89 booster bolted up just fine to cobra master, but that pedal was hard as a brick.

and yes, the tower got a little love from a 5lb sledge trying to get my cobra booster in, but if i had just taken my intake and valve cover off to start with i dont think it would have been necessary.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Apr 26, 2017
#25
  • Apr 26, 2017
  • #25
I wouldn't make the suggestion if the brake feel wasn't acceptable. My car will stop more than adequately from 40 MPH. The pedal is firm like you'd want it to be. Compared to the manual MC that was on the red car, this thing is the sht. Again,..what they changed in diaphragm diameter on my fairmont, they added piston stroke in the current fat boy mustang booster. Mine is flatter, and larger in diameter. I'm calling it a win.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,085
21,268
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 29, 2017
#26
  • Apr 29, 2017
  • #26
madmike1157 said:
I wouldn't make the suggestion if the brake feel wasn't acceptable. My car will stop more than adequately from 40 MPH. The pedal is firm like you'd want it to be. Compared to the manual MC that was on the red car, this thing is the sht. Again,..what they changed in diaphragm diameter on my fairmont, they added piston stroke in the current fat boy mustang booster. Mine is flatter, and larger in diameter. I'm calling it a win.
Click to expand...


Noobz347 said:
How did/does brake-lock feel?
Click to expand...
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,924
10,572
203
polk county florida
Apr 29, 2017
#27
  • Apr 29, 2017
  • #27
TOOLOW91 said:
How come no one mentioned cursing a lot ? lol I massaged my tower a bit
Click to expand...
Come on @74stang2togo
DO IT!
 
Reactions: Adieu

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Apr 29, 2017
#28
  • Apr 29, 2017
  • #28
karthief said:
Come on @74stang2togo
DO IT!
Click to expand...
I dunno... His current CT is pretty dang good.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,255
17,939
224
Massachusetts
Aug 16, 2017
#29
  • Aug 16, 2017
  • #29
Found out some info that may be useful. I remember this thread because an alternative booster is always something that would appeal to many, but i needed to find some info first to do a little math

79-85 booster: single diaphragm 220mm booster
79-93 2.3L N/A : Same single diaphragm 220 booster
86-93 5.0 use dual diaphragm 152mm unit
94-04 use dual diaphragm 205mm booster
Click to expand...

I did crosscheck part numbers, and an early fairmont booster is same as early fox booster.

So, i'll compare in terms of available booster surface area, which may correlate to increase in assist.


The Dual 152mm unit on the 87-93's offers the lowest level of assist with a surface area of 3629 cm^2. The early 220mm booster offers about 6% more surface area (3801 cm^2), while the dual 205mm unit offers a little less than 50% more booster surface area (6601^2) than the 87-93 unit.

So to summarize, the early booster should offer a slight improvement in boost assist if space is a concern and you don't want to try to shoehorn in an SN95 booster.
 
Last edited: Sep 3, 2017

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Aug 16, 2017
#30
  • Aug 16, 2017
  • #30
I'll stick with my 93' Cobra booster since it's already in the car, however, one persons review on a booster leaves me skeptical. The booster install is a big PITA to have to do over in the event that Mikes interpretation of "good pedal feel" when braking is different than the majority.

madmike1157 said:
My car will stop more than adequately from 40 MPH. I'm calling it a win.
Click to expand...
Only 40 mph? Doesn't seem like much testing has happened
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 16, 2017
#31
  • Aug 16, 2017
  • #31
It was a pain but my cobra booster went in with no slotting or banging the strut towers.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Aug 16, 2017
#32
  • Aug 16, 2017
  • #32
This is interesting and makes me wonder what I will do for the 85, the pedal is ok but not great with the stock booster. I dont want to bash the strut tower.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Aug 17, 2017
#33
  • Aug 17, 2017
  • #33
Since this has been revived, and since I have driven the car about 350 miles now,....I do have an update.

While I agree my statement was ambiguous, and is open to interpretation based on actual preference, I was comparing the existing booster to nothing as an alternative.

I had manual brakes in the red car.
That equates to "nothing".

So then,...here's the deal:

You cannot "lock" the brakes in this car, nor is the pedal "hard as a brick". I said that my brake pedal feel is very good,...and doesn't require any additional effort to get the car to stop. Now, stopping like a 2005 GTO,.or any late model.........not even close. That can be due to several factors however, none of which I have explored fully yet, but can be summed up in several possible scenarios:

#1. The booster is inadequate, and cannot assist in moving the required fluid to the four disc's currently on my car.(SN 95/ Cobra stuff on all four corners, Cobra MC, adj prop valve)
#1a. The booster is OLD...this is 38 yr old factory installed unit.
#2. I haven't got my brake bias adjuster dialed in to properly proportion brake pressure, and I'm giving the rear brakes too much bias...(unlikely, because I should be able to at least lock the rears instead,....but they are 315's after all,...and that is a giant amount of rolling mass for a 12" rotor to try and lock up...) Maybe I should throw the stock 185/15's back on and try it?
#3. The 6.5 qts of engine oil that I decided to apply to the entire underside of my car (to include the driver side front/rear brake systems especially) as a result of a -10 oil line failure, has fouled those two wheels, and now I have a "less than" with regard to optimal friction application when the pad meets the rotor. This is in spite of the fact that I thoroughly cleaned those two surfaces after my personal Exxon Valdeez moment **

** No indigenous wildlife was injured during this oil spill, and great care was taken to properly contain this enviro-hazard.
Our people labor tirelessly when my car decides to sht itself, and all necessary steps are taken to return our roads, and parking lots back to their normal, disgusting surface quality in the exact same condition that they were prior to being coated in brand new, synthetic 5w30 Syntec.


In hindsight,..The brake system seems good enough for a daily driver, but lacks the stopping power required for an absolute emergency panic stop, or if you wanted to track the car. It's not 100% definitive yet, I haven't even checked that the brakes are optimally bled, optimally biased, or that they are somehow compromised ...I've been too focused on trying to spin the tires, not stop them.
 
Last edited: Aug 17, 2017
Reactions: Davedacarpainter, Mustang5L5, a91what and 3 others
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 88 Notched Fox
  • NotchedGarage
  • Jul 15, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2024
Flyboy60
F
Cobra booster installed !@#$
  • Steel1
  • Jan 24, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2023
nompen
B
Cobra brake booster question
  • Bdude93
  • Dec 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 12, 2021
ThinBlue502
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Get'm While They're Hot! '93 Cobra Booster Info.
  • JKWilson61
  • Feb 22, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 28, 2020
coupe89
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?