• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Mild Vortech Supercharger Vs Good Alum Heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob F
  • Start date Start date Mar 2, 2016

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
Mar 2, 2016
#1
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #1
Looking for thoughts on Supercharger vs Heads. I have a stock 88 speed density 5.0 with mild bolt ons (Shorty headers, h pipe, 70mm tb, power pullys, 4.10 gear etc.) I also have ready to install a 93 Cobra intake, 130 amp alternator, e fan, and N20. I was going to do a 75hp shot of N20 along with the other things listed above. Now I am leaning toward doing the 70hp Vortech kit, upgraded fuel pump and not using N20. I assume with the cobra intake and exhaust mods the 70hp will turn into a little more? Or would it make more sense to do a good set of heads also with upgraded fuel pump? I know the Vortech will cost a little more (including all labor) but it would still be in my budget since I would sell the nitrous kit. Last question: with the intake and supercharger would 1.6 or 1.7 roller rockers be a good upgrade on stock heads? Thanks guys.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 2, 2016
#2
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #2
Honestly with the a decent set of heads and that intake you will see 70hp. If you are contemplating both the power adder should always come last.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter and a91what

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Mar 2, 2016
#3
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #3
Do heads and decent cam first...then sc. My .02
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Mar 2, 2016
#4
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #4
I'm going to be on the opposite side. I would do the blower,pump,etc and get the 75hp. You can tear into the motor later. You would benefit from a tune though.
 
Reactions: Bob F
J

jAEded

Active Member
Aug 12, 2013
418
26
39
Cali
Mar 2, 2016
#5
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #5
I sort of agree with 5liter.

Or, plan it out based on you getting a supercharger later, but you'll suffer slightly tell then. The heads for superchargers generally have lower compression than the ones that aren't for superchargers. Pump gas might be a issue.

I have the 58cc chambers and you can still deck it a little to get compression higher. The heads for supercharges, I believe, have 62 or 64 cc chambers.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 2, 2016
#6
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #6
what's N20?
 
J

jAEded

Active Member
Aug 12, 2013
418
26
39
Cali
Mar 2, 2016
#7
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #7
I believe he means n-2-o
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 2, 2016
#8
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #8
jAEded said:
I sort of agree with 5liter.

Or, plan it out based on you getting a supercharger later, but you'll suffer slightly tell then. The heads for superchargers generally have lower compression than the ones that aren't for superchargers. Pump gas might be a issue.

I have the 58cc chambers and you can still deck it a little to get compression higher. The heads for supercharges, I believe, have 62 or 64 cc chambers.
Click to expand...
He's talking a 75hp kit. Not a block splitting unit. With the goals stated I'm not even sure I'd spend money on it, but if his end goal was in the 500hp range and lifting the front tires at the track, then sure. Plan it out with low comp heads and a cam ground for boost. For added grunt on top of a basic 280hp hci there's no reason to over build.
 
J

jAEded

Active Member
Aug 12, 2013
418
26
39
Cali
Mar 2, 2016
#9
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #9
I was basing my statements off the ops decision to use nox.

But I agree.
 

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
Mar 2, 2016
#10
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #10
Good points for both ways. One thing I do like with the Vortech is I can keep the car speed density. That's hard to do with most cams. The other thing is I can upgrade the Vortech for more power later. Does anybody think upgraded roller rockers are a good idea with Vortech and stock heads?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 2, 2016
#11
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #11
jAEded said:
I believe he means n-2-o
Click to expand...

sarcasm :

noun sar·casm \ˈsär-ˌka-zəm\

the use of words that mean the opposite of what you really want to say especially in order to insult someone, to show irritation, or to be funny
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Mar 2, 2016
#12
  • Mar 2, 2016
  • #12
Bob F said:
Good points for both ways. One thing I do like with the Vortech is I can keep the car speed density. That's hard to do with most cams. The other thing is I can upgrade the Vortech for more power later. Does anybody think upgraded roller rockers are a good idea with Vortech and stock heads?
Click to expand...
No real reason to upgrade the rockers as far as durability goes. There is a slight increase of performance with 1.7's but it wouldn't be noticeable in your case. Bang for the buck...just do what you need to install the blower and rock out. Adding heads etc in the future is highly recommended. The basic blower is more than capable for a fun street car.
 

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
Mar 3, 2016
#13
  • Mar 3, 2016
  • #13
A5literMan said:
No real reason to upgrade the rockers as far as durability goes. There is a slight increase of performance with 1.7's but it wouldn't be noticeable in your case. Bang for the buck...just do what you need to install the blower and rock out. Adding heads etc in the future is highly recommended. The basic blower is more than capable for a fun street car.
Click to expand...
Funny thing if I do the Vortech I won't be using the valve covers I got from you, but I will keep them for future heads!
 
Reactions: A5literMan
J

jAEded

Active Member
Aug 12, 2013
418
26
39
Cali
Mar 3, 2016
#14
  • Mar 3, 2016
  • #14
mikestang63 said:
sarcasm :

noun sar·casm \ˈsär-ˌka-zəm\

the use of words that mean the opposite of what you really want to say especially in order to insult someone, to show irritation, or to be funny
Click to expand...

I actually didn't intend it to come across that way. I was just giving the chemical formula for what I believed he was saying.
 

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
Mar 4, 2016
#15
  • Mar 4, 2016
  • #15
I dont have a problem with someone correcting my typo. It is funny though when you read the definition of sarcasm it says "the use of WORDS..." well neither n2o or no2 are words!
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Mar 4, 2016
#16
  • Mar 4, 2016
  • #16
Heads, intake, nitrous.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Mar 4, 2016
#17
  • Mar 4, 2016
  • #17
Grn92LX said:
Heads, intake, nitrous.
Click to expand...
My favorite
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
577
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
936
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
676
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
9
WTB: Procharger or Vortech Supercharger – 1996–1998 Mustang GT 4.6 2V – Budget $3,200
  • 96mustang.gt
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
344
Want to Buy May 3, 2026
roblabsn95
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?