• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

MLS Head gasket .030 Over Okay for Stock Bore?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blown331LX
  • Start date Start date Feb 16, 2008

Blown331LX

Member
Apr 5, 2005
227
0
16
Chapel Hill, NC
Feb 16, 2008
#1
  • Feb 16, 2008
  • #1
Rebuilding my engine again, just switching to forged bottm end and ditching the stock 94 HyP pistons. I plan on upgrading to ARP head bolts and ARP intake bolts as well as the MLS (multi layed steel) head gaskets because I plan on boosting or spraying down the road. My problem is the smallest bore I can find the MLS gasket for 302 in is a 4.030 bore made by MR Gasket. Is there a problem using a .030 over gasket on a stock 4.0 bore? Is there a head gasket that would be better suited for my application that would be standard bore?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 16, 2008
#2
  • Feb 16, 2008
  • #2
Many headgaskets are 4.100". They run just fine

Many MLS gaskets are on factory rides as well.

You have no worries...
 

Blown331LX

Member
Apr 5, 2005
227
0
16
Chapel Hill, NC
Feb 16, 2008
#3
  • Feb 16, 2008
  • #3
You want your headgasket bore as close to cylinder bore as possible. The .030 are for 30 over bore and .060 for 60 and so on. I have never fun a MLS gasket on a 5.0. I know that the modular 4.6 and 5.4 use the MLS style and seem to do okay even though the first gens were know for leaking oil from the back corner of the headgasket. Are they worth the added cost? Are also heard some people are re-using them, is this possible?
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Feb 16, 2008
#4
  • Feb 16, 2008
  • #4
like said earlier, most head gaskets are 4.100 I highly doubt it makes any kind of difference if you have it exactly the size of the bore or bigger by that much. It will just make a small difference in compression, very negligable.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Feb 16, 2008
#5
  • Feb 16, 2008
  • #5
fabfordtech said:
You want your headgasket bore as close to cylinder bore as possible.
Click to expand...
Ideally... yes.

For 99.99% of what is being built on this site... diameter of the gasket will make no difference...

Run the gasket, and enjoy the motor

jason
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Feb 17, 2008
#6
  • Feb 17, 2008
  • #6
vristang said:
Ideally... yes.

For 99.99% of what is being built on this site... diameter of the gasket will make no difference...

Run the gasket, and enjoy the motor

jason
Click to expand...

I completely agree with that statement.... I actually use the Fel-Pro 1133 MLS on any bore under 4.100"

Besure to retorque them after you get some heat into the motor, thsi will ensure a leak free expierence. You would be fine using the standard Fel-Pro 1011-1 gaskets, I've run a ton of power through them with no issues. If you get greedy any gasket will blow, the MLS just tends to do a little more damage

Yes you can drill out the rivots, clean all layers, coat them and re-use them in a pinch. I still prefer to just replace them.
 

Blown331LX

Member
Apr 5, 2005
227
0
16
Chapel Hill, NC
Feb 17, 2008
#7
  • Feb 17, 2008
  • #7
Rick 91GT said:
I completely agree with that statement.... I actually use the Fel-Pro 1133 MLS on any bore under 4.100"

Besure to retorque them after you get some heat into the motor, thsi will ensure a leak free expierence. You would be fine using the standard Fel-Pro 1011-1 gaskets, I've run a ton of power through them with no issues. If you get greedy any gasket will blow, the MLS just tends to do a little more damage

Yes you can drill out the rivots, clean all layers, coat them and re-use them in a pinch. I still prefer to just replace them.
Click to expand...

What do you mean they do more damage? My car is going to be a street car not really building a drag motor. With this said should I just run the standard Fel-Pro 1011-1? And is this one just a regular graphite style?
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Feb 17, 2008
#8
  • Feb 17, 2008
  • #8
MLS gaskets aren't very forgiving, so if something is amiss with the air/fuel and you would have normally just popped the gasket, you may end up with something like a hole in the piston instead. I can't really answer which you should choose because it's ultimately up to you. My personal take, I'd probably run the 1011-1 and hope that if I ever lost a gasket, that's all I lost. With the MLS, you're probably not going to lose the gasket first.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Feb 18, 2008
#9
  • Feb 18, 2008
  • #9
StangGT1995 said:
MLS gaskets aren't very forgiving, so if something is amiss with the air/fuel and you would have normally just popped the gasket, you may end up with something like a hole in the piston instead. I can't really answer which you should choose because it's ultimately up to you. My personal take, I'd probably run the 1011-1 and hope that if I ever lost a gasket, that's all I lost. With the MLS, you're probably not going to lose the gasket first.
Click to expand...

Matt is correct they also require the heads and block to have a specific RA finish for proper sealing.

The 1011-1 is a composite gasket (Performance Series) with a stainless steel fire ring, the 8548PT2 is a graphite (OEM style replacement gasket).
 
T

TokyoJoe

New Member
Mar 25, 2007
179
5
0
Feb 18, 2008
#10
  • Feb 18, 2008
  • #10
I have a .30 overbore and I use a felpro 3311 mls gasket that is for 4" - 4.1" bore diameters without any problems. AFter seeing a standard gasket after a few months of nitrous I switched to MLS. Don't let these guys scare you, you can pop a piston just as easily on a regular gasket. Just keep a good tune and you won't have any problems.

And yes the surface RA is essential on the type of gasket you are using
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Feb 18, 2008
#11
  • Feb 18, 2008
  • #11
I personally would stay away from MLS gaskets. As mentioned they can be a lot less forgiving as a printoseal type gasket. Some guys that run high boost applications refer to them as "fuses".

But you CAN burn a MLS gasket. I replaced this one last weekend.

 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Feb 19, 2008
#12
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #12
Nice Job Mike.... What happenend?

I typically only put a MLS style gasket on a high compression or high cylinder pressure set-up, otherwise the standard style gaskets work just fine, require a standard surface finish and are a lot cheaper.
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Feb 20, 2008
#13
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #13
+1 on using the gasket as a fuse.

The 8548's (tin firing ring) have been proven to work well as have the 9333's (stainless).
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Feb 20, 2008
#14
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #14
I just remembered something. MLS gaskets usually have a thinner compressed thickness. This can change quench and in some cases cause p/v issues.


Rick 91GT said:
Nice Job Mike.... What happenend?
Click to expand...

Rick,

This isn't my doing. lol I replaced that for a customer. The guy got the engine REALLY hot!
 

Blown331LX

Member
Apr 5, 2005
227
0
16
Chapel Hill, NC
Feb 21, 2008
#15
  • Feb 21, 2008
  • #15
What are you guys refering to when you say surface RA? And I know a good tune is important. Any gasket made or piston available can fail for alot of reasons.
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Feb 21, 2008
#16
  • Feb 21, 2008
  • #16
fabfordtech said:
What are you guys refering to when you say surface RA? And I know a good tune is important. Any gasket made or piston available can fail for alot of reasons.
Click to expand...

RA stands for roughness average….and that's exactly what we are referring to in this case. The Comteics require a much finer surface finish, most likely because they don’t have the deformation properties that softer gaskets do. When you don't have the heads and deck machined to the appropriate finish, you'll most likely have issues with coolant leaks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
934
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
909
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
P
New to StangNET
  • Popeye1790
  • Apr 19, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
913
The Welcome Wagon Apr 19, 2024
Popeye1790
P
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Engine How common are blown head gaskets on a stock 5.0?
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 7, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2022
shindokwan
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?