willys1
Active Member
That was obviously a 5spd,the one I drove was an aode (vert) is was down rite slow!!!--It sounded awsome though!!SuperStang83 said:
Modded 5.0 Vs. Stock 00 GT
- Thread starter 1qckFOX
- Start date
Look at sig for both cars mods...
My 2000 GT with prochamber, catback, with heavy chrome rims is .1 faster than my 93 LX (check sig)...but my 2000 GT finishes about a mile per hour faster...
Since you have more mods than I do and if you know how to drive you should put a couple cars on him...I have no "motor" mods on the 5.0 and its close...
I sure miss the 2000 GT...it handled, sounded, and looked better
David
My 2000 GT with prochamber, catback, with heavy chrome rims is .1 faster than my 93 LX (check sig)...but my 2000 GT finishes about a mile per hour faster...
Since you have more mods than I do and if you know how to drive you should put a couple cars on him...I have no "motor" mods on the 5.0 and its close...
I sure miss the 2000 GT...it handled, sounded, and looked better
David
willys1
Active Member
With the exception of the mach 1 and svt cobra IMO,94--2004 stangs where a mistake! 87-93 stangs are way better looking!! The new Mustang (2005) are the best looking stangs ever built! Just my opinion.
