• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Monte Carlo Bar Fitment Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tim65GT
  • Start date Start date Oct 11, 2007

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Oct 11, 2007
#1
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #1
I am researching Monte Carlo bars to fit my Setup. I did a search, but the threads don't have any end result/solutions.

SBurkey:
I see you have a Sanden Compressor and a Curved Monte Carlo Bar. It looks like it barely clears.

I have the Sanden Compressor, but it's part of the Vintage Air Kit with V-belt and you have a Sepentine setup. Do you know - does it mount the compressor farther foward or the same as a V belt?

I have a MSD Distributor, and it appears to be too high for a Straight Bar, so a curved one is my choice, but I'm not sure about the clearance at the Compressor. Although my compressor (or engine?) seems to be lower. I put a straight edge across the inner fenders and measured about 1 1/2" to the compressor body, The top mount ears stick up higher though.

What Brand did you get? Do the cheaper ones use thinner steel? I'm getting an Export Brace too. Any Suggestions? Chome or Black? Any disadvantages?

I'm also planning on getting the Global West Subframe Connectors. Does it matter if I do them first - last?

Thanks for input from anyone with a similar setup.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Oct 12, 2007
#2
  • Oct 12, 2007
  • #2
There really are no negatives to using an Export brace. Every car should have one installed.

A curved Monte Carlo bar offers practically no support for the shock towers. More for appearance than function.

I highly stress that you install the Export brace prior to the subframe connectors as you might need the firewall to flex in order to get the Export brace installed. 40+ year old sheet metal will have shifted around a lot over the years.
 

sburkey1967

New Member
Sep 7, 2007
54
0
0
Maple Valley, WA
Oct 12, 2007
#3
  • Oct 12, 2007
  • #3
You hit the nail on the head, it is VERY close. I have been waiting to turn it over to see just how close. It is within an 1/8" to 1/4" max and I was even concerned with engine twist that it would hit. If you look closely the Monte Carlo bar isn't bolted in on top as I was going to have to drill those and I wasn't going to do it if it wouldn't work anyway.
The serpentine has some adjustment but not much. The second part of that problem is the thermostat housing and getting a line on it that will work. I want to use the coolflex hose and I definitely don't think there is enough clearance with a ninety degree elbow on it. I was looking at doing some adjustable ones, but not sure if it is worth the pain if the Sanden compressor won't work either.
Sorry, I can't offer more advice as I am still in the same predicament my self.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Oct 12, 2007
#4
  • Oct 12, 2007
  • #4
Thanks for the replies.

A curved Monte Carlo bar offers practically no support for the shock towers. More for appearance than function.
Click to expand...

Really? I figured a curved type bar would have a thicker wall tubing to prevent the flex. Can anyone input one that? I see a lot of curved Monte Carlo Bars out there for just looks.
 
6

68conv4sp

New Member
Oct 24, 2005
270
0
0
Oct 12, 2007
#5
  • Oct 12, 2007
  • #5
My curved Monte carlo was easy to install BECAUSE it is rather weak by being bent. The straight bar I have was slightly too long (my towers have moved inwards a little over 40 years) and also did not clear the distributor. Hence the curved bar. Monte Carlo bars are really only effective in compressive strength applications, using the straight tubings resistance to compression. The curved bar's only remaining resistive component is its resistance to bending (poor), which leaves appearance as its main advantage.
 

geostang351

Member
Mar 30, 2005
946
0
17
Danb., CT
Oct 12, 2007
#6
  • Oct 12, 2007
  • #6
dennis112 said:
A curved Monte Carlo bar offers practically no support for the shock towers. More for appearance than function.
Click to expand...

I disagree. Anything to keep the shock towers from "falling" into one another is a help.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Oct 12, 2007
#7
  • Oct 12, 2007
  • #7
I disagree with the above comments regarding the curved monte carlo bar's only benefit is appearance. After installing the curved bar I noticed an immediate improvement in the driving dynamics of the front end- particularly when turning. Also, by installing it I gained a significant amount of camber because it pushed the towers back out to where they belong after 40 years of sag. This allowed me to realign it and remove a bunch of shims to get back to my typical negative camber. WELL WORTH IT

I do not disaggree that a straight bar would be stronger, but you try to flex or compress my curved bar and see how far you get.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
490
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
836
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
583
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
Engine OG “Quickie Cooler” Fan/WP Drive
  • 90trunk
  • Apr 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
892
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 5, 2024
90trunk
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?