• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

More Muscle Cars

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpeach1976
  • Start date Start date Nov 15, 2015

mpeach1976

Active Member
Feb 14, 2014
141
21
39
Nov 15, 2015
#1
  • Nov 15, 2015
  • #1
Back in the day Ford had a few muscle cars: Fairlane, Torino, Falcon, T-Bird and of course Mustang. What happened? Wouldn't it be cool to have the option of a 2 door coyote powered Fusion GT. I think this should happen. I'm just blabbing...would be cool though.
 
Reactions: 97gtstang01

97gtstang01

Active Member
Sep 13, 2015
102
11
28
Nov 15, 2015
#2
  • Nov 15, 2015
  • #2
Great question

sent while thinking of mods for my 4.6s using tapatalk
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Nov 29, 2015
#3
  • Nov 29, 2015
  • #3
I agree it would be cool. Right now, there are a few GM selections that offer some V8 rear drive variety. Cadillac, the past Pontiac G8, GTO, Chevy's SS or Caprice models give some options. Dodge has the Charger and Challenger.

Maybe a V8 Lincoln or a return of the ever faithful Crown Victoria, Grand Marq and Marauder. They tried the T-bird with the retro model. That really didn't do as well as Ford thought it would. The Lincoln LS was a neat car. It would be neat to see that return. Falcon, I'm afraid, will stay an Australian model, never to return to the states.

But upon a little consideration, I don't want Ford to return all its old name plate and ruin their legacy with a something that won't go over well. Like the T-Bird all over again.

Ford is pretty in tune with the market. I think if they think they can sell it they would. As much as I love the V8, there seems to be a lot of evidence that it won't be around much longer. The rise of the turbo 4s and 6s would indicate the impending doom of the V8. I hope I'm wrong.

I don't see how a turbo 6 has any better gas mileage than an equally powered V8. Every body seems to equate turbo charging with fuel economy. Maybe its how you drive it or maybe its just a sales gimmick. I'm not drinking the Koolaid and jumping on the turbo bandwagon just yet.

Getting a little lengthy. But, yes, I would love to see more V8 rear drive Fords.
 

Adieu

Easy there, this ain't a dating site.
20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 7, 2002
9,531
5,187
224
Nov 29, 2015
#4
  • Nov 29, 2015
  • #4
The real problem is that Ford prices anything truly interesting out of the most important demographic of enthusiasts' price range. So does pretty much everyone else though.
 

mpeach1976

Active Member
Feb 14, 2014
141
21
39
Nov 29, 2015
#5
  • Nov 29, 2015
  • #5
I wouldn't expect them to make different cars in V8's from the factory, but like back in the day you could get an option package of which could include a V8. Like Mattstang04 said; other companies have various V8's to choose from like Dodge with both the Charger and Challenger. That said; why couldn't they offer (for the cost difference between a turbo 6 cylinder and a coyote V8) to put a V8 it into a Fusion or Taurus. Gt seems to be Ford's staple like SS to Chevrolet an R/T to Dodge. They should offer more car models in a GT for sure... being that the GT badge would mean it had a V8. Sell cars how ever they come from the factory and for a little extra offer a 'GT' package. Of course within reason...you wouldn't put a V8 into a Focus or Fiesta.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Dec 2, 2015
#6
  • Dec 2, 2015
  • #6
2017 will see a 350hp Fusion ST using a 2.7L Ecoboost and torque vectoring AWD, its MKZ counterpart will have a 3.0L Ecoboost making 400hp 400trq
 

Phillip123

Active Member
Jan 5, 2015
125
17
28
Dec 21, 2015
#7
  • Dec 21, 2015
  • #7
The Falcon is still here... faster than a Lambo!

Behind That NAIVE LOOKING FORD FALCON GT Is Hidden A Lamborghini Gallardo Beater!NO Car NO Fun! Muscle Cars and Power Cars! |
 

mpeach1976

Active Member
Feb 14, 2014
141
21
39
Jan 2, 2016
#8
  • Jan 2, 2016
  • #8
Phillip123 said:
The Falcon is still here... faster than a Lambo!

Behind That NAIVE LOOKING FORD FALCON GT Is Hidden A Lamborghini Gallardo Beater!NO Car NO Fun! Muscle Cars and Power Cars! |
Click to expand...
Are you in Australia?
 

Phillip123

Active Member
Jan 5, 2015
125
17
28
Jan 3, 2016
#9
  • Jan 3, 2016
  • #9
mpeach1976 said:
Are you in Australia?
Click to expand...
Nope. Birmingham, AL.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 

mpeach1976

Active Member
Feb 14, 2014
141
21
39
Jan 5, 2016
#10
  • Jan 5, 2016
  • #10
Phillip123 said:
Nope. Birmingham, AL.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I ask because Ford Australia still makes the Falcon
 
Reactions: Phillip123
R

Redskulker

New Member
Nov 30, 2015
3
0
1
Jan 7, 2016
#11
  • Jan 7, 2016
  • #11
Mattstang04 said:
Ford is pretty in tune with the market. I think if they think they can sell it they would. As much as I love the V8, there seems to be a lot of evidence that it won't be around much longer. The rise of the turbo 4s and 6s would indicate the impending doom of the V8. I hope I'm wrong.

.
Click to expand...

This touches on why I made the engine choice that I did. Not too long from now I see a v6 being in the position a v8 is today. Of course if gas stays "reasonably priced" this may be delayed a bit.
 

Phillip123

Active Member
Jan 5, 2015
125
17
28
Jan 7, 2016
#12
  • Jan 7, 2016
  • #12
mpeach1976 said:
I ask because Ford Australia still makes the Falcon
Click to expand...
Makes sense
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Jan 9, 2016
#13
  • Jan 9, 2016
  • #13
Falcon is about to be moth balled. Mustang is moving in.
 

Svtpilot

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
944
59
59
Long Island, NY
Jan 19, 2016
#14
  • Jan 19, 2016
  • #14
Even though they are not the V8 muscle cars we all want , Ford will be making a 325HP AWD Fusion Sport. So that plus the already mentioned 350 HP Focus RS, now 2 Lincolns with 400hp, the Raptor and of course the Mustang/Shelbys and the new Ford GT gives us Ford fans quite a few performance choices. I wonder if the 350hp Focus combined with the new Camaro which is lighter and more powerful then the Mustang means we can expect our favorite Pony Car to receive a nice boost in horsepower.. I would like to think that Ford doesn't want to see its flagship performance car get smoked at red light by a hatchback or a family sedan .
 
D

dgc333

2-1/8" feels smooth and substantial in my hands
Dec 7, 2014
28
4
13
Jan 21, 2016
#15
  • Jan 21, 2016
  • #15
Mattstang04 said:
I don't see how a turbo 6 has any better gas mileage than an equally powered V8. Every body seems to equate turbo charging with fuel economy. Maybe its how you drive it or maybe its just a sales gimmick. I'm not drinking the Koolaid and jumping on the turbo bandwagon just yet.
Click to expand...

I have been driving turbo 4s continuously for the past 30 years as a daily driver.

I have always been able to get significantly better fuel mileage than equivalent HP naturally aspirated engines.

My current daily driver is a 15 Ecoboost Mustang. With the mods I have on the car I am making in the range of 350HP / 390 ft-lbs. I have a 50 mile round trip suburban commute that I average 29-31 mpg tank full to tank full, on the hiway at a constant 70 mph I get 32-33 mpg.

The reason you can do better than a NA engine is 85-90% of the time the engine is not in boost so you are essentially driving a small displacement NA car.

The complaints about turbo engines not delivering on the great mileage promise is when they put a really small engine in a car that doesn't make enough power off boost to move the car along in normal driving and these cars will spend a much larger percentage of there time in boost.

In the case of my Mustang I can do my commute without ever going into boost and comfortably keep up with traffic so its like driving a 2.3l NA engine. If I do that my mileage jumps up to 37-38mpg.

Dave
 

Paul G

Active Member
Jun 10, 2013
106
11
29
Feb 8, 2016
#16
  • Feb 8, 2016
  • #16
This is a good thread. We saw a complete decline in 2 Door vehix, yet Japan and Germany still crank them out as an offering to their 4 door equivalents.
Regarding the Retro T-Bird, it was not that it did poorly, it was never planned to be a long production run with high prod numbers. It was planned to be a limited vehicle. Also, T-Birds was always a name-plate Ford used to test the waters with for new designs. Wasn't until the 70's it became just another big two door hulk sharing the same platform as the LTD, etc..

At this point with Eco Boost 4 Cyl cranking out 300 + HP and 300 + torque, and the EPA and US GOV piling on the mileage standards, I think turbo I4's will be a thing of the future.

I do agree with someone who mentioned cost, it's getting to the point where a Focus RS carries a near or over $40K price tag. I know it's an RS, but it's still a Focus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
645
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
L
Electrical issue
  • Landonf00
  • Aug 10, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
137
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 10, 2025
Landonf00
L
Fox Ideas for Theft Deterrence in Storage
  • Clutchfork
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 1, 2025
91AOD5.0LX
J
Car Diagnosis
  • j.2016
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
3
Views
333
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 31, 2025
Noobz347
J
'96 Cobra: A/C gets weak and engine misfires under load when warm
  • jruhnke
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
2
Views
315
SVT Tech Forum Nov 20, 2025
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?