• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

More Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter A88MustangGT
  • Start date Start date Mar 3, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
A

A88MustangGT

New Member
Mar 3, 2011
7
0
0
Michigan
Mar 3, 2011
#1
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #1
Hey whats up fellas? New to this and would like to know some more mods i could add that would help with horsepower. I know the obvious would be supercharge that SOB, but i would like to know what else. Any input is appreciated. Thanks guys. Here is a list of the major mods i have so far.




Block is a 306
Cobra Upper and lower ported & polished
24# injectors
E303 Cam from Comp Cams
Cold Air induction
1 5/8 Hooker Headers
H-pipe to 2 chamber Flowmasters with Medral bent pipes
70mm Throttle body
New T-5 Tranny with Heavy duty Corba Clutch Kit
Pro 5.0 Short Throw Shifter
31 spline axle
3.73 Gears posi traction
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Mar 3, 2011
#2
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #2
You didn't mention heads. Do you still have the stock E7s? If so, those are the most obvious items that need upgrading.
 
A

A88MustangGT

New Member
Mar 3, 2011
7
0
0
Michigan
Mar 3, 2011
#3
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #3
No E7 are gone have gt40. I have been thinking of replacing those though with some other heads that would be compatible, and also produce more power. No ideas yet though.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Mar 3, 2011
#4
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #4
Bigger heads, better intake, bigger cam, all of that would make for an angry little 306. or you could just throw a blower on it the way it sits. Either route and you will probably need to replace the injectors with bigger ones
 
A

A88MustangGT

New Member
Mar 3, 2011
7
0
0
Michigan
Mar 3, 2011
#5
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #5
90lxcoupe said:
Bigger heads, better intake, bigger cam, all of that would make for an angry little 306. or you could just throw a blower on it the way it sits. Either route and you will probably need to replace the injectors with bigger ones
Click to expand...

Ya people have been telling me 30-36 maybe even 42.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Mar 3, 2011
#6
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #6
42# and no FMU if you boost it
 

Wildstringer

New Member
Feb 20, 2011
65
0
0
Mar 3, 2011
#7
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #7
1. underdrive pullies
2. electric fan
3. you said 70mm t-body what size MAF?
4. all the horse power in the world won't do any good if you can't get it to the ground, so maybe some suspension upgrades...control arms and so on
5. heads
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,062
2,667
224
Vass, NC
Mar 3, 2011
#8
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #8
If you stay n/a, keep the 24s, but you may need more pressure to make it work. You'll save money, but you might run a little rich down low without a retune.

Couple things you didn't mention which are great bang for the buck: MAF - I recommend Pro-M if your car is an '89 or later mustang, and I didn't see underdrive pullies (March makes good products here, don't use the alternator pulley if you're still running the stock 75-amp one.

Oh yeah, I didn't see the tornado, either

Anyway, that's a decent intake, but you can probably free up another 50hp in a swap to a premium set of heads like TFS TWs or AFR165s. The E-cam is not bad, but it's probably still costing 15-20ish hp over a custom.

Good luck,

Chris
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,062
2,667
224
Vass, NC
Mar 3, 2011
#9
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #9
Oh yeah, probably the biggest bang for your buck right now is Drag Radials. That'll cut .2-.3 off of your short times and probably closer to .5 seconds at the 1/4 mile.
 
A

A88MustangGT

New Member
Mar 3, 2011
7
0
0
Michigan
Mar 3, 2011
#10
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #10
FastDriver said:
If you stay n/a, keep the 24s, but you may need more pressure to make it work. You'll save money, but you might run a little rich down low without a retune.

Couple things you didn't mention which are great bang for the buck: MAF - I recommend Pro-M if your car is an '89 or later mustang, and I didn't see underdrive pullies (March makes good products here, don't use the alternator pulley if you're still running the stock 75-amp one.

Oh yeah, I didn't see the tornado, either

Anyway, that's a decent intake, but you can probably free up another 50hp in a swap to a premium set of heads like TFS TWs or AFR165s. The E-cam is not bad, but it's probably still costing 15-20ish hp over a custom.

Good luck,

Chris
Click to expand...
Not sure on the MAF, and not really sure how to check. I have herd of a speed density system also not sure if i have that. Honestly not familiar with that stuff at all. Underdrive pullies i plan on using the bbk underdrive pulley kit.
 
A

A88MustangGT

New Member
Mar 3, 2011
7
0
0
Michigan
Mar 3, 2011
#11
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #11
I was thinking of going with the trickflow top end kit on summit racing. Is that worth the upgrade for more power or should i stay with what i have and build on that
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,062
2,667
224
Vass, NC
Mar 3, 2011
#12
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #12
Check this out:

http://www.stangnet.com/images/stories/2009/05/enginepartsguide/50enginepartsguide.jpg

Take a look at #s 12 and 13. That's your MAF. Take a look at it and see what it looks like on top of the black plastic sensor unit. If you see "Pro-Flow" or "Pro-M" on it, it's a good aftermarket one. If not, it's likely stock. However, I think C&L made use of the stock sensor from Ford.
 
A

A88MustangGT

New Member
Mar 3, 2011
7
0
0
Michigan
Mar 3, 2011
#13
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #13
FastDriver said:
Check this out:

http://www.stangnet.com/images/stories/2009/05/enginepartsguide/50enginepartsguide.jpg

Take a look at #s 12 and 13. That's your MAF. Take a look at it and see what it looks like on top of the black plastic sensor unit. If you see "Pro-Flow" or "Pro-M" on it, it's a good aftermarket one. If not, it's likely stock. However, I think C&L made use of the stock sensor from Ford.
Click to expand...

Hey thanks a lot for that diagram i saved it, it is really helpful i appreciate u showing me that. I just checked the MAF and yup its stock.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,062
2,667
224
Vass, NC
Mar 3, 2011
#14
  • Mar 3, 2011
  • #14
That's a little surprising given your mods and the fact that you're running 24 lb injectors.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,670
87
79
Cyprus
Mar 4, 2011
#15
  • Mar 4, 2011
  • #15
A88MustangGT said:
No E7 are gone have gt40.
Click to expand...

In that case I'd leave the engine long block well alone. Just upgrade the suspension, add stickier tires, SFCs, and stick a blower on the engine. You'll get a lot more bang for your $$$ than doing another HCI swap.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Mar 4, 2011
#16
  • Mar 4, 2011
  • #16
I'd recheck your injectors.
A stock maf won't work right with 24lb injectors.
Are the injectors blue?

As far as more performance, add either twisted wedge heads or afr 165's.
Coupled with the right injectors and meter you are probably looking at about a 40rwhp gain.
 

Wildstringer

New Member
Feb 20, 2011
65
0
0
Mar 4, 2011
#17
  • Mar 4, 2011
  • #17
I second that... stock MAF's are calibrated for 19# injectors. Also that 70mm throttle body isn't helping as much as it could when it's behind a 55mm ( i think thats what stock is) MAF.

24# are blue tops
19# are yellow tops
 
A

A88MustangGT

New Member
Mar 3, 2011
7
0
0
Michigan
Mar 4, 2011
#18
  • Mar 4, 2011
  • #18
Injectors are blue def 24. MAF looks stock i will post exactly whats on it soon maybe you guys can help me figure it out. Anyway again im new at all this so i appreciate all the help im getting from you guys.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,015
1,613
194
NJ
Mar 4, 2011
#19
  • Mar 4, 2011
  • #19
You could possibly be looking at a C&L meter, which uses the stock sensor.

Either way, without any heads, you have too much injector.
 
S

Stang37t

New Member
Mar 16, 2011
10
0
0
Mar 16, 2011
#20
  • Mar 16, 2011
  • #20
With that setup just replacing the maf with the tube will give you instant hp. Not dramatic of course but from stock yes. Recommend cl with the matching of injectors. I learned the hard way when I had an extra cl parts after bigger injectors. But yea gears, radials, maf and you'll be pleasantly surprised. .2 to .4 off quarter
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
387
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Monday at 2:45 PM
joeybuddy96
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
670
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?