• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

mustang 5.0 carb bolt pattern doesn't match intake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter twin_turbo_mk3
  • Start date Start date Mar 12, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

twin_turbo_mk3

New Member
Feb 10, 2009
31
0
0
Mar 12, 2009
#1
  • Mar 12, 2009
  • #1
hi

so im converting my 91 mustang 5.0 to carb so i baught the following.

edelbrock performer rpm intake
edelbrock 600cfm carb. # 1405

so i try to bold it in for test fit but the bol pattersn are different. what gives?

i baught it thinking that since its both edelbrock it would match.

i could only bold 3 out of 4 bolts. do i need some sorth of spacer with two different bolt patter? i was uncer the impesion that a carb can be bolted to the intake directly.
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
cleveland, oh
Mar 12, 2009
#2
  • Mar 12, 2009
  • #2
sounds like there's a flaw with the one of the two. either a bolt hole is off on the carb or the intake spacing on the studs is off. how much is it off by?
 
T

twin_turbo_mk3

New Member
Feb 10, 2009
31
0
0
Mar 12, 2009
#3
  • Mar 12, 2009
  • #3
lang williams said:
sounds like there's a flaw with the one of the two. either a bolt hole is off on the carb or the intake spacing on the studs is off. how much is it off by?
Click to expand...

i would say its off by about 2-3mm

is this a common flaws? i have research this two and noone mentioned this. do i have to use special bolts or something?
 

93 LX

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2000
3,081
3
0
Norwalk, CA.
Mar 12, 2009
#4
  • Mar 12, 2009
  • #4
I would think you have a bent stud...
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
cleveland, oh
Mar 12, 2009
#5
  • Mar 12, 2009
  • #5
93 LX said:
I would think you have a bent stud...
Click to expand...

wow....i was making it too complicated...if they are used studs it could be. my experience with edelbrock has always been positive. american made quality stuff that doesn't have the flaws you get with the overseas made stuff.
 
T

twin_turbo_mk3

New Member
Feb 10, 2009
31
0
0
Mar 12, 2009
#6
  • Mar 12, 2009
  • #6
lang williams said:
wow....i was making it too complicated...if they are used studs it could be. my experience with edelbrock has always been positive. american made quality stuff that doesn't have the flaws you get with the overseas made stuff.
Click to expand...

i wish that was the case but i bought new studs today and it still doesnt match
 

93 LX

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2000
3,081
3
0
Norwalk, CA.
Mar 12, 2009
#7
  • Mar 12, 2009
  • #7
make sure the studs are indeed straight. Use a square to make sure. I have used NEW studs and after they are installed one didnt thread straight. A tap fixed it and the Capri runs great.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Mar 13, 2009
#8
  • Mar 13, 2009
  • #8
Is it possible that the studs are in the postions for the Qjet layout?

Otherwise, if the holes are not straight it will cause the studs to not fit well.
 
T

twin_turbo_mk3

New Member
Feb 10, 2009
31
0
0
Mar 13, 2009
#9
  • Mar 13, 2009
  • #9
rd said:
Is it possible that the studs are in the postions for the Qjet layout?

Otherwise, if the holes are not straight it will cause the studs to not fit well.
Click to expand...


what is a qjet layout? how do i know its qjet?

and basically the two front holes and the passenger side one fit. the driver side back one doesn't fit.

seems that if i enlarge the bolt holes on the carb it would fit.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 13, 2009
#10
  • Mar 13, 2009
  • #10
It probably has to do with how straight the holes are drilled in the intake for the studs. If one or more of the studs isn't perfectly straight up and down then you'll have problems.

Are the studs almost in a square pattern? A quadrajet would be wider in the rear than the front.
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
cleveland, oh
Mar 13, 2009
#11
  • Mar 13, 2009
  • #11
i thought of that too but then thought i've never heard of a quadjet intake for a ford.
 
T

twin_turbo_mk3

New Member
Feb 10, 2009
31
0
0
Mar 13, 2009
#12
  • Mar 13, 2009
  • #12
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
It probably has to do with how straight the holes are drilled in the intake for the studs. If one or more of the studs isn't perfectly straight up and down then you'll have problems.

Are the studs almost in a square pattern? A quadrajet would be wider in the rear than the front.
Click to expand...

thats not the case iether as i try to match the whole location withour bolting it just matching and the driverside back is just off. im thinking widening the carb hole to fit it since the other 3 fit perfect. since 3 hole matching pefect im assuming it will be straight.
 

93 LX

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2000
3,081
3
0
Norwalk, CA.
Mar 14, 2009
#13
  • Mar 14, 2009
  • #13
take the intake back.. defective...
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 14, 2009
#14
  • Mar 14, 2009
  • #14
Yeah i would say you got a jacked up intake.

Out of curiousity, and don't take this as an insult or anything...but are you putting the carb on in the right direction? You know the bolt pattern isn't perfectly square so if you turn the carb 90 degrees then the holes won't line up.

Yeah, dumb question but sometimes they have to be asked
 
T

twin_turbo_mk3

New Member
Feb 10, 2009
31
0
0
Mar 14, 2009
#15
  • Mar 14, 2009
  • #15
^^^ well i cant return it since i baught it of some guy used.

85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Yeah i would say you got a jacked up intake.

Out of curiousity, and don't take this as an insult or anything...but are you putting the carb on in the right direction? You know the bolt pattern isn't perfectly square so if you turn the carb 90 degrees then the holes won't line up.

Yeah, dumb question but sometimes they have to be asked
Click to expand...


no worries i already tried to fit it all 4 ways lol. and basically teh only way i ca fit 3 bolts when i have the "edelbrock" label facing the front.

and heres what im talking about. View attachment 266426
 

93 LX

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2000
3,081
3
0
Norwalk, CA.
Mar 15, 2009
#16
  • Mar 15, 2009
  • #16
found this on the edelbrock site..

You must use Edelbrock Adapter #2732 when installing a
Performer Series carburetor on certain Edelbrock intake manifolds.
In those applications, install the adapter as shown (See Fig. 5).

http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_new/misc/tech_center/install/1000/1405.pdf
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 15, 2009
#17
  • Mar 15, 2009
  • #17
Wow that's news to me, but then again i've never owned or used an Edel carb either. I bet you wouldn't have this issue with a Holley
 

white 89 GT

Member
Apr 3, 2003
281
0
17
Tacoma
Mar 15, 2009
#18
  • Mar 15, 2009
  • #18
Do the throttle plates open all the way without hitting when the carb is sitting on the manifold.
Carb or manifold one of them is junk. I would never think about using one of those edlebrock carbs, the word performance does not apply to them.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Mar 15, 2009
#19
  • Mar 15, 2009
  • #19
This is interesting info. I have an Edelbrock Performer RPM and a Holley intake on my Foxes and my Holleys fit fine.

I have a Performer and an Edelbrock 1406 on my Chevelle. It has the spread bore intake openings and dual bolt patterns (what I called the q jet pattern earler). It was a real pain in the but to find a carb to intake gasket for this. Even the Edelbrock tech guy got it wrong... twice. I ended up changing the stud positions. So there are some issues out there.

I would measure what you have, call Edelbrock and check on the situation and the spacer, and as a last resort, modify the holes.
 
I

iapexl8r

Member
Apr 1, 2005
254
0
17
Mar 15, 2009
#20
  • Mar 15, 2009
  • #20
are all four butterfly valves on the carb the same size? if they are not you have a spread bore carb.. and need a square bore carb.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
372
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
794
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
L
2004 Mustang GT issues after bolt-ons added
  • Leo090
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 24, 2025
Leo090
L
Black SN95 Convertible 5.0 small boost
  • Jacobn4056.
  • Feb 16, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 29, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?