• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

Mustang II popularity

  • Thread starter Thread starter deadhead5.0
  • Start date Start date May 2, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Aug 9, 2012
#61
  • Aug 9, 2012
  • #61
HaveII said:
Typically in the other model mustangs (65-70, fox) I always thought the coupe was lighter than the fastback. I guess that would explain why Shelby only used the fastbacks.
Click to expand...

Do you know why they're called "fast backs"? Aerodynamically, the fast back is faster than a notch back. This is why Chevrolet changed the Monte Carlo coupe to a "fast back". Bill Elloitt in his fast back T Bird was crushing the Monte Carlos. Back then you had to run what the factory built in NASCAR. Chevy was getting their butts kicked at the super speedways so they had to change the shape of the roof and back deck to become competitive.

That's why Shelby used the fast back cars. Given every other part is identical, a fast back will go faster than a notch back.
 
S

SteveND

New Member
Aug 13, 2012
8
0
1
Aug 13, 2012
#62
  • Aug 13, 2012
  • #62
I had 3 different 76, 77 Cobra II's all V8's I miss those cars very much
 

Mstng2

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2002
789
5
19
- - Zion - -
Aug 19, 2012
#63
  • Aug 19, 2012
  • #63
Power Surge said:
The biggest "mistake" about the MII, and in my opinion the thing that started the whole MII hating thing, was the name. The "II" designation was the single biggest mistake. It basically told people "this is not a Mustang, but something different". It gave people a reason to hate the car, because even in Ford's eyes, it wasn't a full fledged Mustang. The II designation seperated these cars from all others that bear the Mustang badge. If there was no II designation, and in 74 is was just the "new Mustang", I bet anything none of this would have ever happened. It would just be a particular year that wasn't overly popular, like the 71-73, but it would still have the same respect as any other Mustang.
Click to expand...

I would conjecture that the single, by far, biggest problem was the HP. If it had come out with a 400 HP option I guarantee it would be in the record books as one of the favorites of all time. Horsepower, not name, nor looks, gave it the bad rap.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Aug 19, 2012
#64
  • Aug 19, 2012
  • #64
Mstng2 said:
I would conjecture that the single, by far, biggest problem was the HP. If it had come out with a 400 HP option I guarantee it would be in the record books as one of the favorites of all time. Horsepower, not name, nor looks, gave it the bad rap.
Click to expand...
not so much. Put 400 HP in one right now, color it perfect, and see how many people jump at the opportunity to own it. More than likely only II owners that are going to jump at it.
 
S

SteveND

New Member
Aug 13, 2012
8
0
1
Aug 19, 2012
#65
  • Aug 19, 2012
  • #65
I'd buy it lol
 

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,376
5,359
194
Corn County USA
Aug 20, 2012
#66
  • Aug 20, 2012
  • #66
fiveohwblow said:
not so much. Put 400 HP in one right now, color it perfect, and see how many people jump at the opportunity to own it. More than likely only II owners that are going to jump at it.
Click to expand...

Maybe, maybe not. I have at least 1 offer a year on mine...
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Aug 20, 2012
#67
  • Aug 20, 2012
  • #67
fiveohwblow said:
not so much. Put 400 HP in one right now, color it perfect, and see how many people jump at the opportunity to own it. More than likely only II owners that are going to jump at it.
Click to expand...

^ This... clean SN95 GTs are still selling for damn good money despite the horribly weak stock power output of 215-225 hp. Why? because generally looks sell more than power.

This is exactly why the Mustangs have continued to sell well while the Camaro, Firebird, and GTO all struggled to compete and ultimately ended production. The new Camaro is another attempt by GM to compete with the Mustang and they're still losing. GM no longer has a power advantage, the only advantage is the IRS which isn't saying much considering how wonderful Ford has managed to execute the SRA in the new Mustangs.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Aug 20, 2012
#68
  • Aug 20, 2012
  • #68
LILCBRA said:
Maybe, maybe not. I have at least 1 offer a year on mine...
Click to expand...
I didn't say there wasn't a market, just likely its someone who was already into the II's to begin with. The car, regardless of power output, doesn't and wont develop a large following.
 

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,376
5,359
194
Corn County USA
Aug 20, 2012
#69
  • Aug 20, 2012
  • #69
fiveohwblow said:
I didn't say there wasn't a market, just likely its someone who was already into the II's to begin with. The car, regardless of power output, doesn't and wont develop a large following.
Click to expand...

Like I said, maybe, maybe not. I don't know all of these people's histories, so I can't say for sure. But it does draw a crowd at local shows because it is unique. Usually, it is the only II there. Sure, it wasn't and will probably never be as popular as other Mustangs, but sales figures show it was popular at the time. Now, if the II wasn't in the name, and horsepower numbers didn't plummet (like all 70s cars did), then maybe it would have more respect. But, the world will never know because that wasn't the case. Besides, in the scheme of things on a Mustang site, with nothing but Mustang fans, what is the point of arguing about it? I like all Mustangs regardless of year, engine or horsepower. I would like to think that most Mustang fans can at least appreciate all styles of Mustangs regardless of which one it is.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Aug 20, 2012
#70
  • Aug 20, 2012
  • #70
LILCBRA said:
Like I said, maybe, maybe not. I don't know all of these people's histories, so I can't say for sure. But it does draw a crowd at local shows because it is unique. Usually, it is the only II there. Sure, it wasn't and will probably never be as popular as other Mustangs, but sales figures show it was popular at the time. Now, if the II wasn't in the name, and horsepower numbers didn't plummet (like all 70s cars did), then maybe it would have more respect. But, the world will never know because that wasn't the case. Besides, in the scheme of things on a Mustang site, with nothing but Mustang fans, what is the point of arguing about it? I like all Mustangs regardless of year, engine or horsepower. I would like to think that most Mustang fans can at least appreciate all styles of Mustangs regardless of which one it is.
Click to expand...


who's arguing?
 

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,376
5,359
194
Corn County USA
Aug 20, 2012
#71
  • Aug 20, 2012
  • #71
fiveohwblow said:
who's arguing?
Click to expand...

My apologies, we II owners almost always have our guard up I suppose.
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Aug 20, 2012
#72
  • Aug 20, 2012
  • #72
LILCBRA said:
My apologies, we II owners almost always have our guard up I suppose.
Click to expand...

 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
279
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
O
1978 Mustang II Headliner Install
  • onusideburns
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
4
Views
410
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 9, 2026
Enzio
Mustang II V6 conversion to V8 HO and T5 problems and solutions
  • greenflash79
  • Jul 6, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jan 29, 2026
greenflash79
B
Progress Thread 1978 Mustang II Rallye Overhaul (302, C4, T-Tops)
  • balaseca29
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
99
Views
3K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 13, 2025
balaseca29
B
F
Paint and Body 1978 Mustang II, What do I have?
  • FIFL49
  • Jul 10, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jul 11, 2024
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?