• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Mustang off the line number

  • Thread starter Thread starter bodvarson
  • Start date Start date Oct 13, 2020
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Oct 19, 2020
#21
  • Oct 19, 2020
  • #21
A pic of the 'report', especially showing where it says "88 built", would clear up this confusion
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Oct 19, 2020
#22
  • Oct 19, 2020
  • #22
FoxChasis said:
But was it 88 total or 88 with that particular body paint color and that particular interior trim code?
Click to expand...
On that report it said 88 for the day, it does mention a certain number of exterior and interior colors too.
 
Last edited: Oct 19, 2020

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Oct 19, 2020
#23
  • Oct 19, 2020
  • #23
Mustang5L5 said:
They made ~211,000 Mustangs for the 1988 model year. I don't know the production cutoff dates for that model year, but lets assume that was for a full 365 days of production...that's almost 600 mustangs a day.
Click to expand...
Mine is a 1992, not sure what the yearly production total was but l recall it being on the low side.
 
Last edited: Oct 19, 2020

Wayne Waldrep

Before I post a pic, do you have one of yours?
20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 14, 2003
1,338
659
143
Cuba, AL
Oct 19, 2020
#24
  • Oct 19, 2020
  • #24
Shakerhood said:
Mine is a 1992, not sure what the yearly production total was but l recall it being on the low side.
Click to expand...
Can we see a pic of the sheet please?
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Oct 20, 2020
#25
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #25
Shakerhood said:
Mine is a 1992, not sure what the yearly production total was but l recall it being on the low side.
Click to expand...
79,280
 
Reactions: Shakerhood
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Oct 20, 2020
#26
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #26
I bet I know why its only 88. Because those reports are by body and engine code. In this case it's 42E. So 88 GT hatchbacks made that day.
 
Reactions: Shakerhood and General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Oct 20, 2020
#27
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #27
Which marti report shares this info? I have the deluxe report and it doesn't say anything about number sequence per day

One of these days i'll probably spring for the personalized stat report.
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Oct 20, 2020
#28
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #28
It's not from Marti Auto Works because they know very well that that info (#___ of ___ that day) is not even known by Ford, so they don't know it either and don't put that garbage on their reports. It's probably a 'Stew Jones' report, which isn't available any more.


Below is a sample of what they looked like, from a 1989 model. The below report says the car was the 89th produced out of 92 on May 25th, 1989. The "92" was P40E (5.0L coupe) produced on one day, not 92 total Mustangs produced on one day.
 

Attachments

  • 250097 - 1FABP40EXKF250097 - 1989 9L LX 5L coupe - ebay.webp
    40.5 KB · Views: 178
Last edited: Oct 20, 2020
Reactions: Shakerhood

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,933
10,575
203
polk county florida
Oct 20, 2020
#29
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #29
What's a Stew Jones report?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Oct 20, 2020
#30
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #30
I've never heard of them prior to this
 

BlakeusMaximus

Still got to try a little lube on my speedo head
5 Year Member
Jul 12, 2017
2,474
1,348
173
Oct 20, 2020
#31
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #31
Mustang5L5 said:
Which marti report shares this info? I have the deluxe report and it doesn't say anything about number sequence per day

One of these days i'll probably spring for the personalized stat report.
Click to expand...
I have that same report on my car, no sequence number either.
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Oct 20, 2020
#32
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #32
Those reports are old school. Like going back 15-20 years, before Marti reports were available for 1979 and later Mustangs. If you remember 'Third Generation National Registry' (the now defunct website thirdgenerationnewsandbeyond dot com) you'll know what these are. Stewart Jones was an MCA Gold Card judge at one time. As was Terry McCoy. McCoy also did reports at one time for 1992 and 1993 'Summer Edition' cars.
 
Last edited: Oct 20, 2020
Reactions: Shakerhood and General karthief

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,052
660
164
SE Michigan
Oct 20, 2020
#33
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #33
Interesting...also never heard of this report. It would be interesting to know how valid the daily production really is. I doubt it was that well documented.
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Oct 20, 2020
#34
  • Oct 20, 2020
  • #34
Ford has, in their production database, the 'day built' for each unit. That date is on Marti reports. Ford does not have the order in which units were built each day. The assembly line does not build units in the order of the VIN but that is what these reports and certificates use to make up the # ___ of ___. That is where they get it wrong.
 
Reactions: Shakerhood and General karthief

JKWilson61

Active Member
Jul 27, 2018
127
149
53
Summerville, SC
Oct 21, 2020
#35
  • Oct 21, 2020
  • #35
Just some food for thought here. Seems everyone's comments applied to production in general. The OP's car is a 'vert. Keep in mind verts came off of the line and were then delivered to Cars & Concepts for final construction. Possibly the marking is from their assembly line as the 86th car down their line at some point? Just a thought.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Oct 21, 2020
#36
  • Oct 21, 2020
  • #36
Found similar writing on this coupe. It’s actually an ‘88 SSP.



I’m trying to avoid dismissing these marks as nothing to pay attention to. We are getting to the point these cars are now classics and numbers like this need to be researched and documented.

or, maybe they are just nonsense
 
Reactions: Shakerhood

Rdub6

So while I wait to figure out my rear end issues
5 Year Member
Dec 29, 2017
3,955
2,937
153
Long Island, NY
Oct 21, 2020
#37
  • Oct 21, 2020
  • #37
Mustang5L5 said:
Found similar writing on this coupe. It’s actually an ‘88 SSP.



I’m trying to avoid dismissing these marks as nothing to pay attention to. We are getting to the point these cars are now classics and numbers like this need to be researched and documented.

or, maybe they are just nonsense
Click to expand...
Are you hiding a second car on us?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Oct 21, 2020
#38
  • Oct 21, 2020
  • #38
No, that’s Gearhead704s coupe on YouTube
 
Reactions: Shakerhood

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Oct 22, 2020
#39
  • Oct 22, 2020
  • #39
FoxChasis said:
It's not from Marti Auto Works because they know very well that that info (#___ of ___ that day) is not even known by Ford, so they don't know it either and don't put that garbage on their reports. It's probably a 'Stew Jones' report, which isn't available any more.


Below is a sample of what they looked like, from a 1989 model. The below report says the car was the 89th produced out of 92 on May 25th, 1989. The "92" was P40E (5.0L coupe) produced on one day, not 92 total Mustangs produced on one day.
Click to expand...
Yep that's the one l have, think you are right as l recall the guys name being Stu Jones.
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Oct 22, 2020
#40
  • Oct 22, 2020
  • #40
So it's 88 (42E) for the day, not 88 Mustangs for the day
 
Reactions: Shakerhood
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
280
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
L
Help with 1986 GT 5 Speed Please
  • Lcasada1999
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
267
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
826
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
B
Engine Another no start after washing engine bay
  • bruno
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
721
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
W
Megasquirt base tune for 94 5.0
  • wrx757
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
216
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2026
wrx757
W
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?