Pirateinastang
New Member
Yeah, just put another 5k into your car and see who is raping who then. You'll be eating vette salad.
Wsmatau said:Nice way to back out and try to save face. Except that your theory still hasn't been proven. Slapping a supercharger on an '05 doesn't make it competitive with a C6. No one is ganging up on you here. You are not a martyr, just wrong.
Why yes it does se the results below.
http://www.whipplesuperchargers.com/product.asp?ProdID=1208
1/4 MILE COMPARISON
TIME
MPH
STOCK
13.58
102.20
WHIPPLE SC'D
11.81
118.35
DIFFERENCE
1.77
16.15
NOTES: Testing done with street drag radials. 05' 4.6 Mustang, manual trans.
0-60MPH COMPARISON
VEHICLE
TIME
STOCK
5.
WHIPPLE SC'D
4.4
DIFFERENCE
.6
NOTES: Testing done with street drag radials. 05' 4.6 Mustang, manual trans.
Pirateinastang said:Yeah, just put another 5k into your car and see who is raping who then. You'll be eating vette salad.
sawman70 said:Exactly, not stock and still in the 12's. If where you live isn't riddled with 10 and 11 sec 5.0 and 4.6 litres I understand your ignorance. I would fear finding a modded F body over a Corvette that will beat me. Lots of 10 and 11 second F bodies out there too. Very few Vettes at those numbers due to the fact most Corvette owners assume that their car is the fastest on the planet and also just a supercharger package runs over $10K installed and that's a lot of cash to invest into a leased vehicle.
Wsmatau, check my spelling, I love when people play the spelling "card". It shows a complete lack of ability to debate. Kinda like going to the race card. Why don't you call me names next, same level of intelligence. I didn't include Shelby because his cars are done right. They don't need flashes to get you to advertised horsepower or to get them to pass emmissions. Shelby does not get grouped in with the rapers....eh tuners you named. Had my 99GT for 5 years with 450+ crank horsepower and never had a warranty issue. My Cobra has 530+ crank horsepower and has never had a warranty issue. What, Mustangs with 50 or 100+ more power at the wheels than a Corvette has at the crank. There still slower though, because just by putting the name corvette on a car shaves 2 full seconds off the ET.
DISCLAIMER: I never said anything bad about the Vette (happen to like them) just that a Mustang can and will beat it with about $7K of mods. That is and was my only point about the Vette / Mustang issue.
royb said:Yeah , right on . People are doing this now and have some very reliable faster than stock c6 cars. for 1/2 the $$$

Trust me I am up on the Whipple S/C and am one of the first in line for one once they finally hit production. Please don't confuse what I have said:royb said:Why yes it does se the results below.
I am not saying that you cannot make a Mustang faster in the 1/4 mile than a Corvette. But drag racing does not a sports car make. I'm saying (and have said throughout this thread) that the C6 is a better all around car. And as 95GTS pointed out, it should be for twice the price.Wsmatau said:Now go buy a supercharger and some new shoes and make it interesting!![]()

sawman70 said:05 mustang with $7,000 of mods waistes a stock C6.
Come over and read the Vette boards, and see how many are "stock". Very few that are racing, I guarantee.bierbelly said:There is the key word. Stock.Come over and read the Vette boards, and see how many are "stock". Very few that are racing, I guarantee.
bierbelly said:There is the key word. Stock.Come over and read the Vette boards, and see how many are "stock". Very few that are racing, I guarantee.
Wsmatau said:I am not saying that you cannot make a Mustang faster in the 1/4 mile than a Corvette. But drag racing does not a sports car make. I'm saying (and have said throughout this thread) that the C6 is a better all around car. And as 95GTS pointed out, it should be for twice the price.
My contention was that slapping a $5000 supercharger on an '05 GT WILL NOT make it all around competitive with a C6 (accelleration is not the only aspect to cars gentlemen). I have every intention of following a similar route and hunting down a local C5 that has been abusing lots of fellow stangers. But I know that in the end mine is a $25k car and his is a $50k car.
After all there are 10 second preludes out there that can blow my doors but that doesn't make them a better car.![]()
sawman70 said:Again, love the hostility.
Any car can run whatever you want with enough money, throw a viper motor in a go kart and let it rip but again, that is not what we were talking about. Sorry that this bothers you so much.
Damn, beating your friends Sti is damn good, those cars launch like raped apes!!!. My car got .3 secs in the 1/4 after i got some miles on it +5k. Any one else experience this? I just sold my 96 Z-28 and got a 05 Z-51 auto vette. All I can say is AWESOME power 12.66 1/4 mile stock except for Corsa sport exhaust. To tell you the truth though, the Mustang sounds better and looks more aggressive. The 05 stang, in my opinion, is definitely the best value dollar for dollar..hands down. Current cars 05 Z51 vette 05 Mustang GT wife has 05 Inifinti G35 sport coupe( damn thing beat my 96 z-28 before trade in, gotta read up on the performance specs) 94 olds cutlass conver. Long live the stang!!! If the stang gets a +25 hp jump in 06 or 07 look out!!Swarzkopf said:Uh... .5 seconds in the quarter mile is a HUGE difference and .5 seconds 0-60 is even bigger.
I beat my friends STI consistently by .5 seconds in the 1/4 mile and I'm usually ahead 4-5 car lenghts when I cross the line.