• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

My dyno results!

  • Thread starter Thread starter csledd
  • Start date Start date Jun 16, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jun 19, 2005
#41
  • Jun 19, 2005
  • #41
Hey christie just got some free time and watched your dyno run. Car sounds real strong and the exhaust note is . What kind of CB/weldins are you running? (dont remeber seeing anything in your sig) EDIT nevermind LOL, steeda huh, man sounds good.
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 19, 2005
#42
  • Jun 19, 2005
  • #42
steeda aka borla
 

posm6s

New Member
Sep 24, 2003
144
0
0
Eddyville, KY
Jun 19, 2005
#43
  • Jun 19, 2005
  • #43
christiesledd said:
the tune is for 93 octane gas so that is what i run (the higher octane is a lot better because they can adjust the timing more, i believe)

Click to expand...
Running 93 huh? I hope you got some left overs in your deep pockets since 93 is like 22 cents higher than 87(I think).

Greedy gas companies.
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 19, 2005
#44
  • Jun 19, 2005
  • #44
it only ends up being like 2-5 extra bucks each time i fill up.. what im waiting to see is how fast it goes down since i should be using 20% more fuel lol
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jun 19, 2005
#45
  • Jun 19, 2005
  • #45
No, that should only be at WOT. you will most likely see an increase in gas milage. I just checked mine again and got 22.9. not to shabby i guess.
 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,841
7
38
New Jersey
Jun 19, 2005
#46
  • Jun 19, 2005
  • #46
snoopy98 said:
I don't know about other years but 2003 definately have 21 lbs injectors i have had to prove this many times. that and i drive a 2003 and it has pink injectors wich are 21 lbs. do a search you will find out that i am right.
Click to expand...

I *DO* remember the fact that in 03 or 04 they did upgrade the GT injectors to 21. HOWEVER...you said yours are pink???? Mine are pink, and I have a 2002... Maybe late model 2002 have 21lbs also? I dontknow when my car was made though, but why do I have pink 21lb injectors then? ...ASSUMING pink =21 lb.
 

posm6s

New Member
Sep 24, 2003
144
0
0
Eddyville, KY
Jun 19, 2005
#47
  • Jun 19, 2005
  • #47
hotmustang331 said:
No, that should only be at WOT. you will most likely see an increase in gas milage. I just checked mine again and got 22.9. not to shabby i guess.
Click to expand...
You lucky, the best I get is 14 with easy highway miles.
 

snoopy98

Founding Member
May 11, 2002
518
0
0
florida,jacksonville
Jun 20, 2005
#48
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #48
from what i understand from other stangers 99-2001 1/2 they used a certain engine i belive romeo then, in 2001 1/2 till 2004 they started using windsor engines wich took the 21lbs injectors. so yeah i think if you have a 2002 then you would have 21 pound injectors. on the engine thing its either or they used romeo then windsor or they used windsor then romeo really dont feel like looking it up but on the injector thing im sure im right on.
 

BlackenedSVT

Active Member
Jan 18, 2004
1,841
7
38
New Jersey
Jun 20, 2005
#49
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #49
snoopy98 said:
from what i understand from other stangers 99-2001 1/2 they used a certain engine i belive romeo then, in 2001 1/2 till 2004 they started using windsor engines wich took the 21lbs injectors. so yeah i think if you have a 2002 then you would have 21 pound injectors. on the engine thing its either or they used romeo then windsor or they used windsor then romeo really dont feel like looking it up but on the injector thing im sure im right on.
Click to expand...

That would make sense, because I definately have pink injectors...its just a matter of "does pink = 21lb?" And from what im hearing here it does. So your theory would make sense.

...and I THINK the windors came out 1st in 99-2001 then late 2001+ are hte Romeo engines... Im not 100% on that either
 

WhiteStang

Founding Member
Jun 11, 1999
125
0
0
Beaufort SC
Jun 27, 2005
#50
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #50
snoopy98 said:
i have had to prove this many times.D
Click to expand...
One more time
Prove it! I've got to see this one.........
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Jun 27, 2005
#51
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #51
270/306 is pretty damned good for a non-cammed, bolt-on stang.

My auto only put down 216/250 before getting blown; and I seriously doubt an o/f midpipe/longtube headers combo would make it even close to that.

Looks like you have a strong runner there.
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 27, 2005
#52
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #52
thanks! like i said i was very happy with my results

im hoping to do cams in the future also.. we'll see cuz the 4.10s and rear end is coming first
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jun 27, 2005
#53
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #53
Back from the dead! LOL. Hey, did you ever get it down to the 1/4 track?
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 27, 2005
#54
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #54
lol nope.. got rained out. but ill be doing the 4.10s in a week and am also getting a hold of a trailer so ill be making a visit soon enough
 

posm6s

New Member
Sep 24, 2003
144
0
0
Eddyville, KY
Jun 28, 2005
#55
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #55
christiesledd said:
lol nope.. got rained out. but ill be doing the 4.10s in a week and am also getting a hold of a trailer so ill be making a visit soon enough
Click to expand...
So your going to trailer your Stang to the track?
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 28, 2005
#56
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #56
yup, we were driving 2 cars everywhere to begin with (transporting the DRs, floor jack, cooler, etc) so it'll be a lot cheaper to just trailer it, plus its less miles on the car and less gas $$! oh and if something breaks it wont be stuck cuz every track is at least an 1 hour away
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jun 28, 2005
#57
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #57
christiesledd said:
yup, we were driving 2 cars everywhere to begin with (transporting the DRs, floor jack, cooler, etc) so it'll be a lot cheaper to just trailer it, plus its less miles on the car and less gas $$! oh and if something breaks it wont be stuck cuz every track is at least an 1 hour away
Click to expand...

You transport your DRs, a fan (i assume for cooldown between runs?), and a floor jack? When I run my DRs, I just bolted them up at the house and drove the 80miles on them...got to the track, let PSI to 21, and ran it (no cool down)....then drove back withem at 21PSI. Drove my dads 00 V6 that next day (5AM) to work. But yea I understand the breakage thing. I was under the impression that the DRs were your DD tires.
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 28, 2005
#58
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #58
nope, the drs are on seperate rims.. dont drive with them on because its over 100 mile trip and we would just rather not put all that wear on them because i bought them for track only

i just got some daytona hr's for pretty cheap and they look pretty good, i seem to get a lot of compliments on them
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jun 28, 2005
#59
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #59
Awsome. Please tell me you bought some 275/50/15s like the ones on my 66. The 15s are lighter and definatly help through the 1/4. next time to teh track I think i will mount them again and see if I can best the 13.5 I ran with the 66 pound per tire/rim DDs. Oh and I bet you will love those 4.10s, and be sure to post a write up. You ought to see a nice drop in 60's with those. I was also pulling 2.0 and 2.1 60' on my drs with stock gears, 3.73s with regular tires (285s) resulted in that 1.90. It helps a BUNCH.
 

posm6s

New Member
Sep 24, 2003
144
0
0
Eddyville, KY
Jun 28, 2005
#60
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • #60
So, any plans on going back to Bowling Green?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
244
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
759
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
G
1991 GT 5.0 running hot
  • gvanginkel403
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
126
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 2, 2026
General karthief
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
285
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
252
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?