• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

My new 351w Is it worthy ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stangninjak
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
Feb 8, 2006
#21
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #21
Thanx Rhyno. I called Edelbrock as well, and the guy I spoke with was very informed. He basically said off the record, that a Air gap will be tight..reeaaal tight, and that a RPM is just as good. Further off the record, he said a stealth is also not a bad way to go, and it will fit.

So I found RPM 351 new for a very good price, and I will get it. Now the carb search is on. What are the Demon carbs called ? Speed Demon ? I might just stick with Edelbrock and get a Thunder 650, or a Performer 750..
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Feb 8, 2006
#22
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #22
Stay away form Demons...their QC has really gone to pot recently and Summit won't sell them because of that.

Thanks for the tech ryno...I'll stick with the forged units and maybe add a 100hp shot
 

67GTCOUPE

Founding Member
Dec 20, 2000
653
0
0
Land of Ice and Snow
Feb 8, 2006
#23
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #23
Forged pistons can take more abuse, they tend NOT to explode into shrapnel when they fail.....UNLIKE cast or hyper pistons which tend to break apart and ruin everything when they fail.

Mahle, SRP, Probe all can be had for under $500.00 per set complete.
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Feb 8, 2006
#24
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #24
Stangninjak said:
How much power did you make with your setup ? I may try a stroke kit, but I was going to see how this went. This is a street/strip car btw..def more steet than strip. I just do not want no dam honda's screwing with me
Click to expand...

I never got it dyno-ed. I am telling you, I'm not impressed. I had 6lbs of boost on a RV cammed stock 289 with cast iron heads, stealth intake and the car had more balls then. I'm not feeling it with this 351. I do plan to eventually use a 750 I built for blow-through, but I'm still gonna go with the 650 with the stage 1 cam. I'm just a little conserative. I say tune up a 650 rather than tune down a 750. With my car now, I still get messed with by hondas and camaros on the highway, but I ignore them. Save it for the track. Had a guy come up next to me in a Del Sol last summer and pop his blow off valve to let me know he has turbo. How nice would that have been to sound off my BOV on a boosted 408w right after that? I know how you feel. This summer, some Del Sol driver is gonna feel small.
 

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
Feb 9, 2006
#25
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #25
Well I picked up a RPM Preformer, and it had some port work done to it. Nice looking piece actually, its actually the Ford Motorsport one, so looks cool with the Ford Blue-oval, and Eledbrock name on it. Carb wise, I am looking to get a Thunder 650 from Eledbrock, or a Holley. I hear that Holley's are hard to tune though...

Well with the RPM I should have the bottleneck you guys spoke on solved, and I will probaly just go to my speed shop and order a new Thunder from them. But I can wait on it, its not a must have atm. Heh now I just need to wait for my block to show up..man this is starting to get good. I want to put this puupy and in, and see what I can do. I will takes some pics to catalog the whole project, to keep a history of sorts.

Hmm now what do I do with all my old parts.. ? Ebay I guess, but man I hate dealing with that..

After I get this done, I will address my old steering pump. maybe a flaming river or a randall's rack...
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Feb 9, 2006
#26
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #26
Stangninjak said:
a flaming river rack...
Click to expand...
Do yourself a favor and don't even think about it. It's the biggest and most expensive POS I've seen in a while. It didn't fit the first time, and they keep saying they revised it so it fits. Last time someone tried, it still didn't. The boy who cried wolf!
 

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
Feb 9, 2006
#27
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #27
5.0ina66 said:
Do yourself a favor and don't even think about it. It's the biggest and most expensive POS I've seen in a while. It didn't fit the first time, and they keep saying they revised it so it fits. Last time someone tried, it still didn't. The boy who cried wolf!
Click to expand...

Hmm well thats good to know....guess its a randall then when I get ready to do that project.
 

Jsprint68

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
54
0
0
NJ
Feb 9, 2006
#28
  • Feb 9, 2006
  • #28
With the forged pistons, things will also run slightly cooler as the aluminum molecules are tighter together resulting in better heat transfer.

At least that is what I was always told!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
310
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
928
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
87
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
428
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?