• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

n/a or supercharged?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 01mgvert
  • Start date Start date Jun 23, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#1
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #1
$2,000 in parts and 37 rwhp later, I've added nearly every bolt-on possible (see signature below). I am now at a crossroad. Do I stay n/a or do I go supercharged? If I stay n/a, I will have the heads polished and ported, buy new valves (springs), and a custom cam. With labor, the cost will be around $4,000, and I will gain 60-70 rwhp bringing me to 305-315 rwhp. My other option is to supercharge my 4.6 with either the Vortech or the Kenne Bell. Both units will cost around $5,000, including $1,000 for installation. (Are there any other expenses with installing a supercharger?) With my current mods, a supercharger should add another 120-140 rwhp, bringing me to 365-385 rwhp. What are the pros and cons of these two options? Any recommendations?
 

GoBabyVroommm

Active Member
Mar 22, 2003
1,156
0
36
Chicago, For Realss???!!!
Jun 23, 2004
#2
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #2
If you want to stay N/A get a 4v motor and take a lot of weight off. I got the 99 cobra motor in mine. After the tune and tires i'll be running 12s all day. If you want to go a little faster put some juice to it.
 

skywarp

New Member
Nov 28, 2003
379
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#3
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #3
Read my post on street legal cams. I'm at somewhat of a crossroads also. I want the blower but with that comes the risk of it all going boom . The basic shortblock we have is fairly decent, its the rods that kill us. You hate to spend that 5-6K and shortly soon after chase that same amount or more into it for a new motor. From what I've read these motors have no specific power limitation. At certain power levels they can go. In reality its all a crap shoot. The cam and heads won't make the LS1 power number we all crave but intially is safer than the blower. How much money you got to spend .
 

Screwed2V

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,255
1
0
Misery
Jun 23, 2004
#4
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #4
Very good points by skywarp. I always suggest that anyone wanting a supercharger have the means to at least replace their motor with another stock one in case of the worst, if not a built motor.

Having said that, I've owned 6 mustangs now with the previous 5 being all motor cars. I was always the guy in the car club that wanted to go fast on motor only and let the blower guys rot. To hell with that lol. I installed the first of 5 different superchargers last year on this car and I can say that there's no way I'll own another mustang without a blower. It's addictive.

Either way can be a lot of fun and like stated above, there's always a 4V swap.

Good luck.
 

RIP 112

New Member
Apr 19, 2004
142
0
0
Round Top, Texas
Jun 23, 2004
#5
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #5
281 VS. 350 IS A BIG DIFFERENCE, you can't catch up when a LS1 is hopped up as a 281. I plan to go N/A, Solely because it'll make my engine last alot longer, and I won't have to worry about burning my rings up every 3 thousand miles because I wanted to floor it for 5 minutes. But running N/A leaves much more room for improvment and look what's happened over the last 40 years, IMPROVEMENT. Ford has made a monster out of the Mustang, and eventually they'll find a way to shut the Corvette out like the Camaro and Firebird, WITH a smaller engine. That's my OPINION, let's not argue about it. You are who you are......
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#6
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #6
skywarp said:
Read my post on street legal cams. I'm at somewhat of a crossroads also. I want the blower but with that comes the risk of it all going boom . The basic shortblock we have is fairly decent, its the rods that kill us. You hate to spend that 5-6K and shortly soon after chase that same amount or more into it for a new motor. From what I've read these motors have no specific power limitation. At certain power levels they can go. In reality its all a crap shoot. The cam and heads won't make the LS1 power number we all crave but intially is safer than the blower. How much money you got to spend .
Click to expand...

I've never thought of superchargers as being dangerous. With a safe tune, what can go wrong? Nitrous, on the other hand, is notorious for blowing engines.
 

RIP 112

New Member
Apr 19, 2004
142
0
0
Round Top, Texas
Jun 23, 2004
#7
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #7
Detonation is never out of the equation, even with a safe tune, it is still giving the engine more of the risk.....
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Jun 24, 2004
#8
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #8
Aside from the safety issue, a n/a 4.6 offers more pride. After all, any idiot can make a supercharged 4.6 fast but it takes a special kind of idiot to make a n/a 4.6 fast. It's kind of like the difference between a steroid-using bodybuilder and a natural bodybuilder.
 
H

HogStang

New Member
Mar 25, 2004
193
0
0
Jun 24, 2004
#9
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #9
That's just something people say who can't afford blowers.
 

GT2000JAY

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,344
0
0
Northwest
Jun 24, 2004
#10
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #10
My opinion is it all comes down to $$$. You can build a quick N/A 281 w/ cams, heads and all the bolt ons. At that point you've got $3,500 - $4,500 into the motor (heads - $1500, cams - $500, exhaust - $500, Misc (plenum, pullies, chip, etc - $1,000. That will get you in the neighborhood of 300 RWHP or so. The other option is to spend $3000 and just drop a blower on an otherwise reasonably stock 281 and put down 350-375 RWHP.

Those are your two conservative options. Option number three is to run N/A, drop money into your motor, and plan to add boost later. So, for $3,500 - $4,500 you're adding heads, blower cams, exhaust, all the usual bolt ons, plus upgrading the fuel system. Once you max out your potential, you drop the extra money in for the blower and put down 450+. Of course, at this point your differential, axles, stock frame (w/ SFC's) etc. all become suspect and prone to failure (not to mention the stock bottom end).

The point is, it is a neverending cycle. The first question I would ask is "At what power level will I truly be happy?". Start with the end in mind. If you want to make big power, then plan accordingly modify accordingly. If you'll be happy with enough to run with the average LS1 then do just the blower and keep it conservative. If you want the pride of an all motor 281 just do the heads, cams and bolt ons. The question is what do you want?

My .02.

Jay
 

Screwed2V

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,255
1
0
Misery
Jun 24, 2004
#11
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #11
01mgvert said:
Aside from the safety issue, a n/a 4.6 offers more pride. After all, any idiot can make a supercharged 4.6 fast but it takes a special kind of idiot to make a n/a 4.6 fast. It's kind of like the difference between a steroid-using bodybuilder and a natural bodybuilder.
Click to expand...
lmao, youv'e got to be kidding me. You asked if you should stay n/a or go supercharged and then you say this in the same thread? I think you just answered your own question here. Wouldn't want to lose your pride lol.
 

DeadLurker

Daily Driven
Sep 7, 2001
7,702
0
0
New York
Jun 24, 2004
#12
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #12
01mgvert said:
Aside from the safety issue, a n/a 4.6 offers more pride. After all, any idiot can make a supercharged 4.6 fast but it takes a special kind of idiot to make a n/a 4.6 fast. It's kind of like the difference between a steroid-using bodybuilder and a natural bodybuilder.
Click to expand...

uh
 

BLK_ROUSH

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2000
1,300
0
36
Newnan, GA
Jun 24, 2004
#13
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #13
Truth ...... answered your own question

01mgvert said:
Aside from the safety issue, a n/a 4.6 offers more pride. After all, any idiot can make a supercharged 4.6 fast but it takes a special kind of idiot to make a n/a 4.6 fast. It's kind of like the difference between a steroid-using bodybuilder and a natural bodybuilder.
Click to expand...

self
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Jun 24, 2004
#14
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #14
GT2000JAY said:
My opinion is it all comes down to $$$. You can build a quick N/A 281 w/ cams, heads and all the bolt ons. At that point you've got $3,500 - $4,500 into the motor (heads - $1500, cams - $500, exhaust - $500, Misc (plenum, pullies, chip, etc - $1,000. That will get you in the neighborhood of 300 RWHP or so. The other option is to spend $3000 and just drop a blower on an otherwise reasonably stock 281 and put down 350-375 RWHP.

Those are your two conservative options. Option number three is to run N/A, drop money into your motor, and plan to add boost later. So, for $3,500 - $4,500 you're adding heads, blower cams, exhaust, all the usual bolt ons, plus upgrading the fuel system. Once you max out your potential, you drop the extra money in for the blower and put down 450+. Of course, at this point your differential, axles, stock frame (w/ SFC's) etc. all become suspect and prone to failure (not to mention the stock bottom end).

The point is, it is a neverending cycle. The first question I would ask is "At what power level will I truly be happy?". Start with the end in mind. If you want to make big power, then plan accordingly modify accordingly. If you'll be happy with enough to run with the average LS1 then do just the blower and keep it conservative. If you want the pride of an all motor 281 just do the heads, cams and bolt ons. The question is what do you want?

My .02.

Jay
Click to expand...

Thanks for the good advice. I'm not sure, however, that you can drop in a supercharger for $3,000. For example, I've done some research on a Kenne Bell system. The supercharger with intecooler is $4899 (add $650, if you want the polished version). The optional inlet system will cost $573. Since I suck as a mechanic, I will need to pay for installation. I'm guessing it will cost $1,000 for labor, including a dyno tune. This brings the total to $6472. I also like the Vortech S-trim with aftercooler (VOR-060SQ). The best price that I found was $4699 (add $300, if you want the polished version). Again, add about $1,000 for labor, and the final bill is $5699.

You are right, though. I need to decide at what horsepower I will be content: 300 rwhp (n/a) or 380 rwhp (blown)?
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 24, 2004
#15
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #15
n/a or supercharged?

That's like asking do like blondes or brunettes. Some people like one, some people like the other.

Me,....I like brunettes...ER...I mean, I like naturally asprirated, but sometimes I like blowers too. For me, a real fast n/a car gets a little bit more respect.
 
V

VatStang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
88
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Jun 24, 2004
#16
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #16
N/A is safer. I do agree with 01mgVert, in the part that N/A offers a lot of pride. I love the feel of superchargers, especially in my friends 04 cobra. But for me, I also love the pull of a N/A motor; I can't really feel the work it takes to get up to speed in a supercharged car though. But dollar for dollar, the supercharger will net you more power.
 
F

Fonzarelli

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
122
0
0
Michigan
Jun 24, 2004
#17
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #17
Even if you decided to stay N/A and went with a 99 4v Cobra motor or something. I bet my last dollar you will supercharge that motor because the power is so addictive. I just had mine(Procharger)installed last week and its not even tuned properly but it makes you wonder why you didnt start saving for one when you first bought the car.

Why keep dragging those bolt-ons along? 1,000 here, 1500 there total=60hp
 
H

Huskerpower05

New Member
Jun 16, 2004
14
0
0
Jun 24, 2004
#18
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #18
Hey everyone, i'm new to this site but i was wondering what be the best choice for some extra hp for a 95 GT. Not much done so far, upper/lower saleen intake, 70mm throttle body, intake, dumped flowmaster exhaust system. at around 240rwhp, im looking to hit 285-290 by next year, any ideas?
 

Screwed2V

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,255
1
0
Misery
Jun 24, 2004
#19
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #19
I can certainly appreciate the hard work that goes into building a fast n/a car but to say that just slapping on a supercharger is easy is a little far fetched and kind of a blind statement.

As someone else has said already, take a quick spin in a blown car and you might think twice. Hopefully the people that say being blown is "the easy way" aren't just saying it because they can't afford it (not saying anyone is btw). That would be sad.
 

02mingreyGT

New Member
Jan 4, 2004
280
0
0
Portales, NM
Jun 25, 2004
#20
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #20
Well its kind of a toss up here but since i just noticed that you already have 4.10s installed the coin lands on heads and that means you stay N/A
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Fuel Fuel Pump Rewire, New Fuel Lines, and Installation of New Fuel Pump Hanger with AN6 Connections
  • AeroCoupe
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
12K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 16, 2023
AeroCoupe
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
4K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
Engine 347 Supercharge Planning
  • HeatShield
  • Oct 17, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2021
Haste347
H
300WHP for $3000
  • Levi.Productions
  • Feb 9, 2020
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
4K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 10, 2020
Sluggie24
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?