• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Need some opinion's on 3:90's...

  • Thread starter Thread starter CobraStang95
  • Start date Start date Jun 14, 2004

CobraStang95

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
84
0
7
New Jersey
Jun 14, 2004
#1
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #1
I'm lookin for a coprimise between 3:73's and 4:10's. I want the acceleration of the 4:10's but don't want to be at 2500 goin 60 down the highway. Soooo what do u guys think about 3:90's? I know they're pretty new, and my buddy got them when they first came out and they f*ed up his rear end and tranny. Are OK now, like do they whine? and do they have almost as good pick-up as 4:10's? thanks
 

SLiM JiM 156

Founding Member
Mar 18, 2002
1,024
0
36
Rohnert Park, CA
Jun 14, 2004
#2
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #2
if its your daily driver, definatley go with 3.73's, you end up shifting so much around town. 4th gear going 40 sucks..
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Jun 14, 2004
#3
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #3
SLiM JiM 156 said:
if its your daily driver, definatley go with 3.73's, you end up shifting so much around town. 4th gear going 40 sucks..
Click to expand...

Hmmm.....I always go 40 in 4th with stock gears. Its at like 1800 rpms too. What do you cruise at? Just curious because I haven't driven a stick really long and I always shift at like 2000-2400 when cruisin'.
 

89MustangGX

I have nothing productive to add!
Jul 3, 2001
10,262
1
0
Mill Creek, WA
Jun 14, 2004
#4
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #4
IMO, don't fear the gear. If you want 4.10 accellerating, get them.

Thinking about it mathematically, deciding between 3.73's and 4.10's is similar to 2.73's to 3.08's -- not much difference. Now you're thinking about 3.90's -- that's splitting that little difference in half. Not worth it if you ask me.
 

95WhiteVenom

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
624
0
16
Alabama
Jun 14, 2004
#5
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #5
I got 3.55's and I shift into 5th at 40. fixing to get rid of them for some 4.10's unless my buddies 3.90's feel better he is getting his car back tom. with them in. If i like them i might get them instead. Either way I'm still gonna get a crazy ride in his tom.
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Jun 14, 2004
#6
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #6
I went with 3.89s. Wanted to be sure I'd be in the right rpm band at the track, but still wanted to keep them as high as I could for on the street. Don't have the setup all done yet, so I can't tell you how it worked out. It really depends on your motor and the rpms you plan on using. Do the 3.90s cost any more than the other 2? If not, put them in and try it out.

I ran 3.73s with a 3550 behind a mostly stock 5.0. I don't believe I would've wanted them any lower for a car that's mostly used on the street and only sees the track on occasion.
 
D

davs5.0

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
921
0
0
windsor,ontario,canada
Jun 15, 2004
#7
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #7
if the 3.90's messed up his rearend and trans, they must have been installed wrong. I've had mine for over a year and i love them. Nice compromise behind my aod. And picked up 2 tenths at the track going from 3.55 to 3.90.
 

GT Trooper

Member
Feb 16, 2004
87
0
7
Redford
Jun 15, 2004
#8
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #8
davs5.0 said:
if the 3.90's messed up his rearend and trans, they must have been installed wrong. I've had mine for over a year and i love them. Nice compromise behind my aod. And picked up 2 tenths at the track going from 3.55 to 3.90.
Click to expand...


How much should I expect to p/u going from 3.08's to 3.73?
 

SuperStang83

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2001
1,693
0
49
Boyertown, Pa
Jun 15, 2004
#9
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #9
I drove a PI'd motor car with 3.90's in it and it felt really strong. I realize that is a totally different motor in your car, but I think they'll rip!
 

MustangMulch

New Member
Mar 27, 2003
303
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Jun 15, 2004
#10
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #10
I really don't understand why so many people approve of 3.73's for a 5-speed daily driver, but when it comes to 3.90's... WHOA thats just way too low!!

The difference is what... 100 RPM? A small price to pay at the pump for better performance, if you ask me. I plan on switching to 3.90's as soon as I get some other stuff out of the way. Not too many people have them in their car, but those that do have nothing bad to say about them.

Yes, 3.90's are a little more costly than 3.73's because FMS doesn't make them. I think the only company that does is Pro 5.0. They go for about $189, whereas FMS 3.73's can be found for as low as $139.
 

cardudeusa

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
1,744
5
48
Home of the Florida Gators!
Jun 15, 2004
#11
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #11
I've never considered 3.90's, but after reading some of these opinions, I think I may go with them when I do gears.
 

FaistyGTS

New Member
May 23, 2004
31
0
0
Estherville,IA
Jun 15, 2004
#12
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #12
I got my 3.90's from Motive Gear, They are a little steep for town driving but They are not that bad only runs 2,100 at 60 on the highway. I'm just running a stock T-5 Also got the 23 tooth speedo gear it runs about 4 mph fast, accoding to the Iowa state patrol. I'd recommend them to anyone, Mine cost $189 from national drivetrain and the install kit with axel bearings was $75. small price to pay for the performance over 2.73's.
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Jun 15, 2004
#13
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #13
a gear swap does not put your car at 100rpm difference, or, 4mph off.
it is a ratio, aka a percentage... thus, the higher you spin it up, the greater the differential will be.
 

Juiced88Coupe

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2001
367
0
0
Austin, Texas
Jun 15, 2004
#14
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #14
I have 4.10's currently and dont think 3.90's would be that big of a difference, and not being FMS gears.....just my .02

-Matt
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Jun 15, 2004
#15
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #15
Try this site for all your gear needs.

http://www.drivetrainsuperstores.com/calculate.asp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
340
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
T
Need advice: 93 Cobra audio upgrade with no permanent modifications
  • THNX SVT
  • Feb 18, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2024
TIGGER
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?