• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Need storker opinions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Legendary
  • Start date Start date Sep 7, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 8, 2004
#21
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #21
bluevenom867 said:
331 will be less streetable IF you have it externaly balanced with a 50Z balancer.But it's difficult to find a 331 kit with a 50Z balancer anyways so no problems.
Click to expand...

I don't know how you figure one balancer will be more streetable than the other. They are both balanced to the same specs. Just have to take off more weight with the 50 oz. Also I've never seen a kit come with a balancer unless it was an assembled shortblock.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 8, 2004
#22
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #22
50Z 331 kit that crank itself wieghs slightly less because of the reduced mass of the internal counter wieghts but has added stress on the snout.28Z kit crank wieght slightly more but less stress on the snout.
Click to expand...

That is what I was thinking. Although there is less weight on the ends there will be more in the crank itself, but I think it is better that way. I am looking into doing a rebuild soon and I am thinking that a stroker is the way to go. I'm going to start saving money until this engine gives out. If I can afford it I would shoot for a 351 based stroker but I doubt that will happen.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Sep 8, 2004
#23
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #23
Legendary said:
So what I'm gathering is durablility isn't really a concern. That's nice to hear. I'm still leaning towards the 331 but it's a big money project.
Click to expand...

I get what you're saying about the durability issues that plagued stroker motors for the longest time. Things have certainly improved since those days but having said that... For everyday driving I personally would opt for the 331 as opposed to the 347 due only to the Rod angle. Yeah, I know about all the offset pins and yadda yadda that's supposed to fix all of that but I'd just have more peace of mind in the compromise. It sounds as if you're leaning more towards a docile setup than the meanest fastest machine on the block. Personally, my final goal is 500 flywheel HP. There's lots of ways to get that power out of a 331 (NA, blown, turbo, etc). So just decide how much power you want to eventually have and go from there. I don't actually recall too many instances where a 347 made that much more power than a 331 anyway (with similar setups).

I'm sure all sorts of folks will jump onto that last line. Let the games begin. hehe
 

Legendary

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2002
1,925
0
0
City of Angels
Sep 8, 2004
#24
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #24
Well I want a reliable car. If I have to give up some horses for it so be it. I want a low 12 second car on street tires. I wouldn't mind dancing around the 11.99 mark. 350 rwhp would be good for me. Trying to do it with ported gt-40's and maybe the new bbk intake.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Sep 8, 2004
#25
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #25
If I don't turbo mine, and still want more umph in the future, I will definitely build a stroker. I wouldn't be afraid of either 347 or 331 -- just get a good kit, and work with a machinist who knows what they're doing with the stroker. No reason it can't last just about as long as a 302 would under similar operating conditions.
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
Sep 8, 2004
#26
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #26
I hope to get a 331 this winter, but I know it won't workout. I will rebuild the 302 though, that is a promise. Maybe move into the 306 range.

But anyways, I have never heard of 331s lasting 7-10k miles. I'm sure you could make it last that long though...
 
J

Jmet

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
58
0
0
Sep 8, 2004
#27
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #27
let me see if i can throw some help in here...im no expert or anything...

one of the previous issues of mm&ff or 5.0 magazine ran an article called "331 ways to waste an LS1" or somethin if i remember it correctly. i recall a paragraph that said how the 331 generally makes more horses while the 347 makes more torque. the differences are 10hp/10lbs. i think it said or so and since they didnt need any more torque they went with the 331 plus some reliability issues it had said. i dunno if im remembering it right but you guys should check it out...it was one of the recent ones i thought...maybe this month???

just tryin to help
 

wildstanggt

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
186
0
0
Omaha, NE
Sep 8, 2004
#28
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #28
like everyone has mentioned, as long as the motor is built right a 331 or 347 will not have any reliability promblems as compared to the 306. The horsepower numbers are relatively similiar. I have 10,000 miles on my 347 and at least a couple hundred passes at the dragstrip spraying nitrous and I have no problems. I run 12.00 with 50 shot and DOT slicks. I am sure you could do the same in the 331 but I do believe in the end the 347 might have more potential. Just look at Rick Anderson's 347 NA that made 450+ hp in MMFF. good luck
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 9, 2004
#29
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #29
Also the old 347's are known for being oil consuming. Just make sure that the oil controll ring does not intersect the wrist pin. That or get a good set of rings (like Total Seal) that are designed to reduce/minimize blowby. You may also hear about them causing extreme cylinder wear but most kits are advanced enough to minimize wear.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Sep 9, 2004
#30
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #30
The only reason most guys go toa 28oz balance with a stroker is due to the amount of material that needs to be removed.

For instance a SCAT 4340 crank, 4340 H-beams and a light aftermarket piston will need around 300 grams removed.

There are factory motors with worse rod angles and ratios out there run for 200,000 miles. Durability is not an issue with the newer style kits with the correct pistons.
 

Legendary

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2002
1,925
0
0
City of Angels
Sep 14, 2004
#31
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #31
I guess my next should be what are some good kits out there? Should I peice the stroker parts myself or just get a kit with everything I need? What are the good brands?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Sep 14, 2004
#32
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #32
Legendary said:
I guess my next should be what are some good kits out there? Should I peice the stroker parts myself or just get a kit with everything I need? What are the good brands?
Click to expand...

Getting a kit is really the best way, no mistakes on compatability. What do you want, I can help....

Rick91GT@suscom.net
 

itltrot

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2000
771
0
16
Ponca City, OK
Sep 14, 2004
#33
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #33
I have a 331 as my daily driver and I have no issues other than the current no start when hot

I did a lot a research before I bought my motor. I felt 331 was more practical for my needs. And my buddy happened to be selling his with 1800 miles on it to go bigger.

I think you are really reaching for 350rwhp if you are planning on reusing your cast iron GT40 heads.

My 331 with afr's, tfs street intake and stage 1 cam put down 311hp. I did have some other tuning issues that needed addressed but its still a long ways from 350.

But like everyone else has said. Depends on who and how the combo is built! Good luck!
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Sep 14, 2004
#34
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #34
Legendary said:
I guess my next should be what are some good kits out there? Should I peice the stroker parts myself or just get a kit with everything I need? What are the good brands?
Click to expand...

I got my kit through CHP. Scat rods and crank and CHP Pistons. Good ****.
 

Legendary

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2002
1,925
0
0
City of Angels
Sep 14, 2004
#35
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #35
Rick 91GT said:
Getting a kit is really the best way, no mistakes on compatability. What do you want, I can help....

Rick91GT@suscom.net
Click to expand...

I'll shoot you an email. I'm far from buying anything right now but I like to do my research early and start saving up!


giddyup306 said:
I got my kit through CHP. Scat rods and crank and CHP Pistons. Good ****.
Click to expand...


They have a website? I always see companies in the magazine ads.

Any more good kits?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
897
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
729
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
330
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Fox Fuel injection questions
  • limp
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
357
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 28, 2025
limp
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?