• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

need tranny advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter stuck
  • Start date Start date Sep 3, 2006
S

stuck

New Member
Sep 3, 2006
2
0
0
Sep 3, 2006
#1
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #1
I got a 68 mustang with a 302 with 300 hp. I wore out the stock C-4 since I was less successful at laying off the gas than I had originally planned. I am considering a C-6 Bulletproof or a FMX. Anyone got an opinion?

I have had this car for 18 years and it was just worn out. I ordered an engine and dropped it along with the headers and everything needed to make it run. Engine is chromed out and runs smooth and I am really pleased with it but the transmission is out now. I am not trying to win any races but I want it to be fast. Hey, if it aint fun, whats the point in owning a classic?
 
T

TOM B

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 15, 2002
872
1
18
Harrisburg Pa
Sep 3, 2006
#2
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #2
I would stay with the C4 trany as there very strong when built up and very light weight. Get yours rebuilt with red clutches and stuff or order one from
TCI starting at $750 for a trany to hold up to 450 hp, thats a good price considering you will pay $1000 or more for a in town trany shop to rebuild yours. I built up my C4 and Im running a blower with a size 13 shoe!!!
 
S

stuck

New Member
Sep 3, 2006
2
0
0
Sep 4, 2006
#3
  • Sep 4, 2006
  • #3
Ok, but I can get a C-6 bulletproof for $715 with up to $200 back for core charge or an FMX for $100 less than that. Money has got to be the big issue for me since I still have a suspension to rebuild, the paint job and interior, wheels...I am just getting started with the mistress I can't afford!
 
T

TOM B

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 15, 2002
872
1
18
Harrisburg Pa
Sep 4, 2006
#4
  • Sep 4, 2006
  • #4
Ok but think of the extra parts you will need to mount those tranys.
I think the crossmember and mount are different as well as the driveline lenth, some more bucks there. and maybe the linkage to, I think I will spend the extra few bucks for a true bolt and drive trany.
 
M

MitchGT

Member
Apr 1, 2005
204
0
17
Sep 4, 2006
#5
  • Sep 4, 2006
  • #5
The C-6 eats up more of your horsepower, gets worse gas mileage, and is heavier. If you had a 460 then get a C-6, with a 302 a well built C-4 is the MUCH better choice, and more than strong enough.
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Sep 4, 2006
#6
  • Sep 4, 2006
  • #6
That C-6 is going to swallow a whole lot of that 300HP and they weigh a ton...

a mildly built C-4 will hold up to alot of punishment....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Help! Fox with idle issues
  • bbarton
  • Sep 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
282
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 12, 2026
AeroCoupe
N
Looking for ECU/CHIP for 1992 5.0
  • Nathan26
  • Sep 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
306
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 8, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
702
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
T5 5th gear 89 gt
  • mac_55
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
268
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2026
Mustang5L5
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
431
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?