• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

Need trans swap info

  • Thread starter Thread starter COBRAIIW
  • Start date Start date Jun 29, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
L

LedZ 5.0

now you have my pea brain going in circles
Apr 1, 2004
204
0
0
Jun 30, 2005
#21
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #21
COBRAIIW, If you decide to use the factory II C4 with the specific II V8 bell the flexplate has 141 teeth. I know Sal knows that, he just got sidetracked between the II V8 automatic flexplate and manual flywheel.

The MII V8 factory manual flywheel has 148 teeth.
 
C

COBRAIIW

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
562
1
0
CT
Jun 30, 2005
#22
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #22
Looks like this old Mopar guy is gettin' his Blue Oval schoolin'

Got my head goin' 'round in circles!!!
 
J

Johan

Member
Jun 12, 2003
81
0
6
Waldheim, LA
Jun 30, 2005
#23
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #23
Wart said:
When I wrote about the position of the weight I was referring to the weights distance from the center of the plate. The closer to the center the more mass needed to create a simular force as a weight placed farther from the center.
Click to expand...

That would be clear if we bothered to use the right terminology for it. The late model flywheel is a 50oz-in, not a 50oz flywheel.
50 ounces x 1 inch from centerline = 50oz-in, or
25 x 2, or 10 x 5, or whatever it really is x wherever it really is = 50 ounce-inches.

I did a quick bit of searching, and almost everybody just says XXoz. It's kinda like saying I have 26lbs of air in my tires instead of saying 26psi.
 
C

COBRAIIW

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
562
1
0
CT
Jun 30, 2005
#24
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #24
Centerline of the crank, the flexplate, TDC? Which centerline?
This is turning into an engineering thread! YEAH !!!!
 

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
Jul 1, 2005
#25
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #25
The centerline of the flexplate has to be the same as the centerline of the crankshaft, otherwise,(among other things) the starter would have serious issues with the ring gear.
The further you place the weight from the centerline of the flexplate, the more "weight" it has while spinning, due to its increase in leverage.

P.S. I couldve sworn the II had 143 teeth on the flexplate?? Well, anyway, close enough, damnit.
 

Wart

I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
Founding Member
Sep 1, 1998
408
3
58
NE Ohio
Jul 1, 2005
#26
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #26
Johan said:
That would be clear if we bothered to use the right terminology for it. The late model flywheel is a 50oz-in, not a 50oz flywheel. 50 ounces x 1 inch from centerline = 50oz-in, or 25 x 2, or 10 x 5, or whatever it really is x wherever it really is = 50 ounce-inches.

I did a quick bit of searching, and almost everybody just says XXoz. It's kinda like saying I have 26lbs of air in my tires instead of saying 26psi.
Click to expand...


I wasn't sure if I wanted to bring roe (radius) into this.

Formula for inertial force is F= (mass * velocity squared)/ radius , or F=MV^2/R

If you wish to find the mass needed to create an equivalent force at a different Radius:

m(1)v^2(1)/r(1)=m(2)v^2(2)/r(2)

Velocity is lineal and figured by pi * d. I think it's not necessasary to put time into the equasion as the period is the same.

IIRC

(something tells me I should work a few examples to make sure I DO remember correctly)
 

Wart

I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
Founding Member
Sep 1, 1998
408
3
58
NE Ohio
Jul 1, 2005
#27
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #27
Blue Thunder said:
The centerline of the flexplate has to be the same as the centerline of the crankshaft, otherwise,(among other things) the starter would have serious issues with the ring gear.
Click to expand...


It would certainly be an 'eccentric' ring gear.
 

Wart

I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
Founding Member
Sep 1, 1998
408
3
58
NE Ohio
Jul 1, 2005
#28
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #28
COBRAIIW said:
Centerline of the crank, the flexplate, TDC? Which centerline?
This is turning into an engineering thread! YEAH !!!!
Click to expand...




Centerline in the plane of rotation.
 

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
1
47
Vancouver, WA
Jul 1, 2005
#29
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #29
OK HERE IT IS, IN BLACK AND WHITE.

FLEXPLATE - Device used to start the engine with an AUTOMATIC trans and provides a coupling point via 4 studs to the torque converter.
FLYWHEEL - Device used to start the engine with a MANUAL TRANNY and provides a coupling point for the clutch assembly.

You will NEED to use THIS flexplate:
P/N B-23115 $143.33 (retail) $129.00(racer's net)
FORD FLEXPLATE 141 TEETH 50 OZ/SFI

It can be found on Art Carr's website at:
http://www.artcarr.com/catalog/ford-B-D-Y.php
or
http://www.artcarr.com/ - main page.

BE SURE YOU HAVE THE CORRECT TORQUE CONVERTER WHICH WILL HAVE A 9 1/4 BOLT CIRCLE THAT BOLTS IT TO THE FLEXPLATE.

IF the bolt circle on your torque converter is ANY OTHER PATTERN -STOP- let one of us know so we and re-direct you down the right path.

Also check the P/N on the Automatics's bellhousing if you not 100% sure it is a II bellhousing. Numbers should read D5ZP-7976-AA. To see these numbers, you'll have to remove the bellhousing from the tranny to see the numbers. (kinda stupid on Ford's part)

Also be sure to have the II specific block plate. OTHER PLATES WILL NOT WORK. The starter is clocked to a different position on the bell housing, so you will need the II plate with the II bellhousing.

May, but not 100% sure, need to change to correct starter aswell.

And that's that, plain as black and white...
 

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
Jul 1, 2005
#30
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #30
I saw an alum flexplate listed on that site. I'm familiar with the alum flywheels, but I didnt realize they even made alum flexplates. Sounds scary.
 
J

Johan

Member
Jun 12, 2003
81
0
6
Waldheim, LA
Jul 2, 2005
#31
  • Jul 2, 2005
  • #31
Wart said:
I wasn't sure if I wanted to bring roe (radius) into this.

Formula for inertial force is F= (mass * velocity squared)/ radius , or F=MV^2/R

If you wish to find the mass needed to create an equivalent force at a different Radius:

m(1)v^2(1)/r(1)=m(2)v^2(2)/r(2)

Velocity is lineal and figured by pi * d. I think it's not necessasary to put time into the equasion as the period is the same.
Click to expand...

We're in complete agreeance. Excuse a little nerdonics:

The v can be represented by 2*pi*r*rpm, giving v in in/min. In case 1 and 2, the rpm is the same, so,

m(1)*[2*pi*rpm*r(1)]^2/r(1)=m(2)*[2*pi*rpm*r(2)]^2/r(2)

m(1)*[2*pi*rpm]^2*[r(1)]^2/r(1)=m(2)*[2*pi*rpm]^2*[r(2)]^2/r(2)

Divide out the [2*pi*rpm]^2 from both sides,

m(1)*[r(1)]^2/r(1)=m(2)*[r(2)]^2/r(2), which simplifies to

m(1)*r(1)=m(2)*r(2)

or 50oz*1in=25oz*2in=10oz*5in=50oz-in.

Now back to your regularly scheduled program...
 

Dano78

Founding Member
Nov 1, 1999
2,633
1
47
Vancouver, WA
Jul 2, 2005
#32
  • Jul 2, 2005
  • #32
Sorry if I came out a little gruff. Usually I'm right up there with you guys, but I'll tell ya, you all were making scrambled eggs outta my grey matter over this topic and I just wanted to get him a simple solution so he can get on down the road with his project.

OTOH I didn't realize whe had quite the group of mathematicians!?!
 
C

COBRAIIW

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
562
1
0
CT
Jul 3, 2005
#33
  • Jul 3, 2005
  • #33
Thanks guys, I decided to take the flexplate I have to a local machine shop to have it rebalanced to 50 oz.
He told me about 2 hrs, and 75 bucks.
 

Blue Thunder

15 Year Member
Mar 20, 2004
1,003
55
68
Upstate New York.
Jul 3, 2005
#34
  • Jul 3, 2005
  • #34
COBRAIIW said:
Thanks guys, I decided to take the flexplate I have to a local machine shop to have it rebalanced to 50 oz.
He told me about 2 hrs, and 75 bucks.
Click to expand...

That sounds fair, coolness.
 

Wart

I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
Founding Member
Sep 1, 1998
408
3
58
NE Ohio
Jul 3, 2005
#35
  • Jul 3, 2005
  • #35
COBRAIIW said:
Thanks guys, I decided to take the flexplate I have to a local machine shop to have it rebalanced to 50 oz.
He told me about 2 hrs, and 75 bucks.
Click to expand...


I like it when people make the right decision.
 

Wart

I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
Founding Member
Sep 1, 1998
408
3
58
NE Ohio
Jul 3, 2005
#36
  • Jul 3, 2005
  • #36
Dano78 said:
That was probably me, Mark. (Ref: the ordeal of hte Art Carr flex plate.)
Click to expand...


No, it wasn't you I was thinking of.

This means there is more than one of you with the same negative Art Carr experience. This is something we ought to keep in mind if thinking of doing buisness with that company.
 

Wart

I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
Founding Member
Sep 1, 1998
408
3
58
NE Ohio
Jul 3, 2005
#37
  • Jul 3, 2005
  • #37
Dano78 said:
Sorry if I came out a little gruff.
Click to expand...



Gruff?

I thought you were being explicit.

And never apologise for doing something that's needed.



OTOH I didn't realize whe had quite the group of mathematicians!?!
Click to expand...


Math is just another tool, one I wish I could use better.
 
C

COBRAIIW

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
562
1
0
CT
Jul 4, 2005
#38
  • Jul 4, 2005
  • #38
Well, I finally got the trans out,counted 141 teeth on the flexplate.
Can't tell if it is 28 or 50 oz., but I also found that my neutral safety switch from the C4 doesn't have a working backup lights detent.but the park/neutral still works.
Price of a new one is around $35.
Pulled out the floor shifter plate and linkage,looks like it might just be a direct swap in.
So far so good,even the flexplate teeth look pretty good.
Off to the machinist tomorrow.
Happy Fourth of July guys!
 
C

COBRAIIW

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
562
1
0
CT
Jul 5, 2005
#39
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #39
Well, I dropped off the flexplate to the machinist this morning,pick it up wed. or thurs.
The parts guys are driving me nuts now,
I ask for a neutral safety switch for a 77 Mustang II with V8 Auto, and they keep saying it's a C3 trans.
Does a C4 with a II bellhousing make it a C3?
 

78CobraII

Moderator
Jul 31, 1998
1,808
8
39
Birmingham, AL
Jul 5, 2005
#40
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • #40
Nope...C3 is a light-duty auto trans usually used with the 2.3L and 2.8L engines, especially in later years of MII production.

Actually the C3 was probably used with all of the automatic trans 2.3L's during MII production, but there are 2.3L/C4 applications such as the Aerostar minivan.

I have heard of folks with the V6 having the C4, but later owners seem to report mostly the C3.

There were no factory 302's with the C3.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
822
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
ECU help!
  • starkiller1134
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
307
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
starkiller1134
S
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
213
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
673
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
D
Foxbody Misfire 5.0 Swap
  • DPORTER0729
  • May 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
598
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 13, 2025
90sickfox
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?