• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech

Need *urgent* help - new 04 stang!

  • Thread starter Thread starter mlindine
  • Start date Start date Dec 4, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Adverse2Change

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
340
0
0
Raleigh, NC
Dec 6, 2006
#21
  • Dec 6, 2006
  • #21
Yes make one of your tunes the 93 perf. But for a daily driver there's no way I'd drive on it all day... only weekends
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Dec 6, 2006
#22
  • Dec 6, 2006
  • #22
Understandable insofar as regular is $.20 cheaper than premium, but why not drive on it all day?
 

ChingonStang

Member
Sep 19, 2004
308
0
16
Dallas, Tejas
Dec 6, 2006
#23
  • Dec 6, 2006
  • #23
mlindine said:
Alright thanks guys. Justing recommended the 93 gas mileage tune? In other news, does anyone know of a site where I can search for some exhaust shops near me? I can't seem to find any located near me except for the one near miami. Any ideas near zip code 33067?
Click to expand...

Magnaflow already has a location finder on thier website, hit that up to find a reputable shop.
 

Adverse2Change

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
340
0
0
Raleigh, NC
Dec 7, 2006
#24
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #24
Give Me TP said:
Understandable insofar as regular is $.20 cheaper than premium, but why not drive on it all day?
Click to expand...

Well I'm sure you've figured out by now that I'm stingy with the gas. I also find that I better keep my ledfoot under control on the 87 tune. Plus there's not much benefit for me having a performance tune when I spend 70 miles on the highway to and from work. Just my choice, you guys drive however you want!
 
O

OxMox

turkeysammichesonhisface
Mar 31, 2005
0
0
0
Palm Harbor, FL
Dec 7, 2006
#25
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #25
i don't know where you are in florida but a great speed shop in the bay area is Coastal Chassis Dyno, Sam, the owner tuned my mach. here's his number if you're interested. 813-849-2423.

Oh, and DO NOT, go with a 4.10 gear in your V6, I did that with mine and I wanted to shoot myself cause I was running out of gear in the high end and could barely break 100mph with out having to worry about my motor blowing. 3.73 will be much better if you HAVE to do a gear, but do the T-Lok at the same time.

intake, catback exhaust and tuner are 3 very easy/cheap/basic ways to get power
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Dec 7, 2006
#26
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #26
Adverse2Change said:
Well I'm sure you've figured out by now that I'm stingy with the gas. I also find that I better keep my ledfoot under control on the 87 tune. Plus there's not much benefit for me having a performance tune when I spend 70 miles on the highway to and from work. Just my choice, you guys drive however you want!
Click to expand...

A Mustang is meant to be driven, shall we say, agressively.

Regardless, a "performance tune" does not mean that decent gas mileage becomes a thing of the past, or that installing a performance tune will turn an otherwise conservative driver into a speed maniac. I drive to work over a hundred miles round trip myself and don't see any reason to not use a performance tune, but do as you feel you must.
 

Adverse2Change

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
340
0
0
Raleigh, NC
Dec 8, 2006
#27
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #27
Haha true, but aggressively safe these days. I also have an 87 performance tune in addition to my higher octane tune. Oddly enough I haven't used it yet.
 

02ponypackage

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
126
0
0
Florida
Dec 8, 2006
#28
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #28
Adverse2Change said:
Haha true, but aggressively safe these days. I also have an 87 performance tune in addition to my higher octane tune. Oddly enough I haven't used it yet.
Click to expand...

i hope 183 rwhp, 213 rwtq arent the numbers you have on a 93 octane tune or even 91
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Dec 8, 2006
#29
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #29
Adverse2Change said:
Haha true, but aggressively safe these days. I also have an 87 performance tune in addition to my higher octane tune. Oddly enough I haven't used it yet.
Click to expand...

Try out the 87 octane performance tune some time and report back if you experience any pre-detonation.
 
M

mlindine

New Member
Dec 3, 2006
24
0
0
Dec 8, 2006
#30
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #30
Give Me TP said:
Try out the 87 octane performance tune some time and report back if you experience any pre-detonation.
Click to expand...

What numbers do you get with that tune? Is there an intake system that doesnt make a mustang sound like a rice burner?
 
T

TehJigSaw

New Member
Dec 7, 2006
0
0
0
Dec 9, 2006
#31
  • Dec 9, 2006
  • #31
intake system??? nope. as for exhaust, go H-pipe and chambered mufflers IE Flowmasters 40 series.
 
T

TehJigSaw

New Member
Dec 7, 2006
0
0
0
Dec 9, 2006
#32
  • Dec 9, 2006
  • #32
hey all joo 00-04 guys in the 180-190 HP ratings how much did you pick up from a tune (87-93) don't care the octane just lookin' to get an idea.
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Dec 9, 2006
#33
  • Dec 9, 2006
  • #33
An intake (CAI) by itself isn't going to have much effect on sound or performance, but will to a greater extent if you add a true dual exhaust system, especially one that includes an aftermarket X-pipe. I haven't heard a V6 that sounds quite as bad as a rice burner, and although they are not going to sound as good as a V8 with the same mods regardless of what you do, there is nothing shabby about the sound from a V6 even when adding a true dual exhaust system, say, as basic as a GT takeoff with a midpipe fabricated from behind the stock cats.
 
M

mlindine

New Member
Dec 3, 2006
24
0
0
Dec 10, 2006
#34
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #34
Alright, sounds good Sorry to keep this thread still going, but, what would you guys recommend as far as the magnaflow exhaust goes? Or just something from http://www.americanmuscle.com/v6-cat-back.html ?

I haven't heard any of these --> http://www.americanmuscle.com/boststcaduex.html How do they sound?
 
M

mlindine

New Member
Dec 3, 2006
24
0
0
Dec 10, 2006
#35
  • Dec 10, 2006
  • #35
Any other help would be greatly appreciated.
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Dec 11, 2006
#36
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #36
The Magnaflow catback referenced in your link is not the way to go. It does not eliminate the constriction of the stock Y-pipe from your exhaust, which should be the real point in converting to dual exhaust in the first place, but instead only gives the "look" of true dual exhaust for a relatively large amount of money.
 
O

OxMox

turkeysammichesonhisface
Mar 31, 2005
0
0
0
Palm Harbor, FL
Dec 11, 2006
#37
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #37
TehJigSaw said:
hey all joo 00-04 guys in the 180-190 HP ratings how much did you pick up from a tune (87-93) don't care the octane just lookin' to get an idea.
Click to expand...

1000hp
 
M

mlindine

New Member
Dec 3, 2006
24
0
0
Dec 11, 2006
#38
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #38
Give Me TP said:
The Magnaflow catback referenced in your link is not the way to go. It does not eliminate the constriction of the stock Y-pipe from your exhaust, which should be the real point in converting to dual exhaust in the first place, but instead only gives the "look" of true dual exhaust for a relatively large amount of money.
Click to expand...

Could you kindly provide me a link you would recommend me to buy for my magnaflow exhaust?
 

Adverse2Change

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
340
0
0
Raleigh, NC
Dec 11, 2006
#39
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #39
TehJigSaw said:
hey all joo 00-04 guys in the 180-190 HP ratings how much did you pick up from a tune (87-93) don't care the octane just lookin' to get an idea.
Click to expand...

Joo? 10-15hp for me (91 tune). It really kicked my torque up a good bit.
 

Give Me TP

Member
Jun 17, 2004
936
0
16
Republic of Texas
Dec 11, 2006
#40
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #40
Any catback that will fit a '99-04 GT will fit your car, whether it be Magnaflow or some other brand, if you have a muffler shop fabricate a midpipe or buy an aftermarket midpipe made to fit a V6. The site you referenced above will have them. Incidentally, the the Steeda exhaust in the link you posted will work, but once again, you must modify your midpipe to use it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
1994 GT 5.0L crank no start
  • Red1994MustangGT
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 19, 2025
Kurt_MO
K
New daily driver help needed.....not a mustang but mustang drivetrain.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
6K
Other Auto Tech Jul 28, 2024
manicmechanic007
R
Engine Need help confirming misfire diagnosis
  • Ramon Cantu
  • Apr 17, 2019
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 24, 2019
wmburns
R
Fox Closed PCV System, Dual Valve Catch Can
  • RTW0223
  • Dec 6, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 30, 2021
jay98
G
92 Fox, Tons Of Changes To A Previously Running Car.....no Start, Need Help
  • Green 94 5.0
  • Feb 10, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 22, 2018
Green 94 5.0
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?