• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

New Dyno Numbers... Does this sound right

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91StangLX
  • Start date Start date Jun 1, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
9

91StangLX

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
95
0
0
Jun 1, 2004
#1
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #1
Just got my car tuned and Dynoed... The numbers I got seem a little high to me. Anyone got anything simular I can compare to.

Here are my Modifications:

306
GT40P Heads Ported and Polished with 1.90 x 1.60 Valves and a .550 lift Spring Kit
1.7 Proform Roller Rockers
Professional Products Typhoon Intake Manifold Ported and Polished
Mac Cold Air Induction
Anderson Ford Motor Sports N-41 Custom Camshaft
70mm TB
80mm MAS
30lb Injectors
Mac Shorty Headers, Mac Prochamber and Mac Cat back Exhaust
MSD 6AL Ignition with MSD Billet Distributer
MSD 9mm Racing Spark Plug Wires
Iridium Plugs
Mac Underdrive Pullies
Art Carr Street Terminator Transmission with a 2600 Stall convertor
FRPP 3:73 rear gears with 31 spline axles, an Eaton 8.8 Differential
Custom Burned Diablo computer chip
255LPH Fuel Pump
Adj Fuel regulater
Set the timing to 16 degrees advance and the fuel to 37 PSI
Eibach Drag 90/10 shocks, FRPP Progressive rate springs
Eibach upper and lower control arms
Sub Frame connectors
QA1 Tubular K Member
Fiberglass hood with 1.5in cowl
Race Weight with driver is 3120
Price to build about 10K
 

66Camaro454

New Member
May 22, 2004
25
0
0
Jun 1, 2004
#2
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #2
Blah Blah Blah dont listen to me
 

cmb91LX

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
432
0
0
Memphis
Jun 1, 2004
#3
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #3
dyno sheets?

I only ask this because this does seem way high espescially with that AOD.
 

Legendary

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2002
1,925
0
0
City of Angels
Jun 1, 2004
#4
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #4
Seems high. You actually seen this dyno sheet or you was told this?
 
9

91StangLX

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
95
0
0
Jun 1, 2004
#5
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #5
Legendary said:
Seems high. You actually seen this dyno sheet or you was told this?
Click to expand...

I was at the Dyno while I was having it tuned and a custom Superchips aftermarket chip set up.

So yes that is the Dyno numbers. The Dyno Tech seemed suprise as well but he said he had run across a few others simular to mine with the same mods and the numbers went from 325-350 RWHP
 

86Cobra

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2000
2,064
1
0
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 1, 2004
#6
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #6
If the port job on your heads and intake is REALLY good and you have 11:1 compression, I could believe that much power through a 5-speed. But not through an AOD. I think that dyno reads high.
 

ninjacoupe

New Member
Jul 6, 2003
174
0
0
NY
Jun 1, 2004
#7
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #7
Have you been to the track with the car?
As for the dyno #'s I know the operator can give you corrected #'s or actual or SAE #'s
and depending on the day they can range 20 or so hp.
The #'s in my sig are corrected for weather, The uncorrected #'s for that day and run were 396hp. Correceted down, but a previous days session(months before the correction was moving the #'s higher. The correction helps you gauge differences in mods on the same dyno but during different conditions.
 
9

91StangLX

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
95
0
0
Jun 1, 2004
#8
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #8
ninjacoupe said:
Have you been to the track with the car?
As for the dyno #'s I know the operator can give you corrected #'s or actual or SAE #'s
and depending on the day they can range 20 or so hp.
The #'s in my sig are corrected for weather, The uncorrected #'s for that day and run were 396hp. Correceted down, but a previous days session(months before the correction was moving the #'s higher. The correction helps you gauge differences in mods on the same dyno but during different conditions.
Click to expand...

Yes the car runs 12.08 @ 112 MPH These are the corrected numbers.
 

houstonstangguy

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2002
979
0
0
Houston, Texas
Jun 1, 2004
#9
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #9
91StangLX said:
Yes the car runs 12.08 @ 112 MPH These are the corrected numbers.
Click to expand...


you actually ran the car or was that a gtech rating? the time doesnt quite look like it matches the speed to me. time looks quick, but speed looks low

your dyno numbers seem quite high to me also. yes I am jealous but still they dont look right.
 

BlownStangGT

REPEAT
Founding Member
Jan 22, 2002
3,860
6
58
Lancaster, PA
Jun 1, 2004
#10
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #10
if thats a real 1/4 mile time then your car is making those numbers and that is dayum impresive!
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 1, 2004
#11
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #11
I'd like to see the dyno curve too. With all the porting, you might be making power above 6,000 rpm - nothing you posted so far indicates rpm.
 
P

PRO50SC

New Member
Dec 28, 2003
1,012
1
0
Olney, Maryland
Jun 1, 2004
#12
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #12
Seems way low if you ask me. For what you have listed as mods. I have a stock block, heads and cam. Just a blower and intake and made 332 rwhp.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 1, 2004
#13
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #13
BigB - your dyno sheet is really hard to read. Looks like the dyno stopped JUST past peak TQ/HP at 5250 rpm. And from the looks of it, who knows if it was peak HP?
 

86Cobra

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2000
2,064
1
0
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 1, 2004
#14
  • Jun 1, 2004
  • #14
PRO50SC said:
Seems way low if you ask me. For what you have listed as mods. I have a stock block, heads and cam. Just a blower and intake and made 332 rwhp. [/IMG]
Click to expand...

He doesn't have a blower.
 
L

limit

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
17
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#15
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #15
86Cobra said:
He doesn't have a blower.
Click to expand...

he dosn't have a mustang
 
9

91StangLX

New Member
Mar 26, 2004
95
0
0
Jun 2, 2004
#16
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #16
houstonstangguy said:
you actually ran the car or was that a gtech rating? the time doesnt quite look like it matches the speed to me. time looks quick, but speed looks low

your dyno numbers seem quite high to me also. yes I am jealous but still they dont look right.
Click to expand...

The actual time according to the time slip is 12.089 @ 112.764 MPH

344 HP @ 5650 RPM and 381 Torque @ 5100 RPM
 

86Cobra

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2000
2,064
1
0
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 2, 2004
#17
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #17
91StangLX said:
The actual time according to the time slip is 12.089 @ 112.764 MPH

344 HP @ 5650 RPM and 381 Torque @ 5100 RPM
Click to expand...

381 rwtq is impossible with your motor (VERY difficult with any NA 306). Also, 381 ft-lbs at 5100 rpm would equal 370 hp at 5100 rpm.
 

Mike86Stang

Advanced Member
Apr 11, 2000
10,296
0
77
Red Lion, PA
Jun 2, 2004
#18
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #18
86Cobra said:
381 rwtq is impossible with your motor (VERY difficult with any NA 306). Also, 381 ft-lbs at 5100 rpm would equal 370 hp at 5100 rpm.
Click to expand...

Not really.... sometimes auto's have wierd TQ spikes that show up on dynos ...all be it ussually at much lower RPM

Seems high but believeable... some cars are just palin stronger than others & attention to detail is pretty much everythingf
 

86Cobra

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2000
2,064
1
0
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 2, 2004
#19
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #19
MSTANG said:
Not really.... sometimes auto's have wierd TQ spikes that show up on dynos ...all be it ussually at much lower RPM
Click to expand...

I think you missed my point. 381 ft-lbs at 5100 rpm is 370 hp at 5100 rpm. Mathematical fact. But he says it peaks at 344 at 5650.

Plus, an auto with a 2600-3000 rpm convertor isn't going to cause a torque spike at 5100 rpm.

The numbers just don't add up. It's about time to throw out the flag.
 

Mike86Stang

Advanced Member
Apr 11, 2000
10,296
0
77
Red Lion, PA
Jun 2, 2004
#20
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #20
86Cobra said:
I think you missed my point. 381 ft-lbs at 5100 rpm is 370 hp at 5100 rpm. Mathematical fact. But he says it peaks at 344 at 5650.

Plus, an auto with a 2600-3000 rpm convertor isn't going to cause a torque spike at 5100 rpm.
Click to expand...

No I didn't miss it just stating something that may or may not be well known.
But yes I totally agree.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
P
4 Hole Bosch Injectors max HP and Tune -4.6 PI
  • Png1978
  • Jul 23, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2022
Chipss36
B
For Sale 1986 Capstang (Part Capri & part Mustang) $12,000 Galena, Ohio
  • BubbaG
  • Aug 7, 2022
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 7, 2022
General karthief
Progress Thread 89 hatch hydroplanedrifterweldeddiff thread:
  • Foxslider
  • Nov 15, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 16 17 18
Replies
352
Views
40K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 23, 2021
Cheapskate207
F
For Sale 2003 Mustang GT Vert with very low miles (21K)-Well taken care of
  • flipnsac
  • Sep 24, 2019
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Oct 3, 2019
flipnsac
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?