• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New Guy from Oregon 79 Pace Car

  • Thread starter Thread starter 79PaceKar
  • Start date Start date Jun 28, 2020

79PaceKar

Advanced Member
Jun 28, 2020
251
311
73
Eugene,, OR
Jun 28, 2020
#1
  • Jun 28, 2020
  • #1
Hello from Oregon. Yes, it's raining today! I am restoring a 1979 Pace Car. Yes it is a true one with the "W". This was a rolling chaise only. Body and four wheels. Nothing but an echo in the car if you looked inside. So far I have purchased a 5.0L from a 91 GT, rear end and disc brakes all around from 95 Mustang and a T-5 transmission. I just found out the T-5 came out of a 2003 Mustang. The engine is a complete engine with the EFI system . So far the engine checks out just fine. Inspected the block and lower end. Oil pan was clean, heads seem fine. Just a little dirty from running cheap gas. I was going to convert the 79 to EFI but after finding out how much this will cost along with amount of work, I am considering swapping intake to a carb. Question: Are the heads compatible with a carb or do I need to change them? Look forward talking with folks. Sorry, I don't do Facebook or tweet. Larry from Oregon Oh yea, I have a Mustang II go kart....
 

Attachments

  • Pace Car.webp
    886.7 KB · Views: 301
  • Go Kart Side.webp
    500.8 KB · Views: 298
Reactions: Olivethefet and 7991LXnSHO

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,872
10,543
203
polk county florida
Jun 28, 2020
#2
  • Jun 28, 2020
  • #2
Looks like a score!!
Yes you can slap a carb on it, those heads can't tell the difference.
 

79PaceKar

Advanced Member
Jun 28, 2020
251
311
73
Eugene,, OR
Jun 28, 2020
#3
  • Jun 28, 2020
  • #3
Thanks muchly.
 

Ryuk

I love your drawers
5 Year Member
Apr 22, 2017
1,680
1,599
133
Jun 29, 2020
#4
  • Jun 29, 2020
  • #4
Take plenty of pics and keep us informed of the progress.
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Jun 29, 2020
#5
  • Jun 29, 2020
  • #5
Make sure you get a bellhousing from a 94/95 mustang if you don’t change the input shaft on the t5. You’ll need the clutch fork as well.
Yes the heads will work for a carb intake. They are the same.
 
Reactions: General karthief

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Jul 8, 2020
#6
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #6
If you want EFI for less $ and hassle, a Holley Sniper TBI EFI and an Edelbrock Airgap RPM Intake and matching cam would be a lot faster than the Pace Car ever started out. The air gap intake would also be great with a carb after you check for hood clearance. The air gap intakes are impressive in testing and customer feedback for street and strip cars. I ran a performer 302 EGR on an E-7 long block (87 up roller cam block and heads) in a ‘79 before the air gap intakes came out and was pleased. I installed a GT type hood scoop on the 79 hood. I placed it for clearance and looks. I cut out the hood under the scoop for more clearance for the air cleaner if I later wanted a carb spacer or taller intake, and it looked like it belonged there. I ran the dual snorkel 4bbl GT carb filter housing (83-85?) and the stock dual cold air hoses and inner fender connectors. The 2bbl, single snorkel housing choked the engine over 4K RPM. The difference was obvious by sound and by seat of the pants feel.

Edelbrock RPM Air-Gap #7521 Intake Manifold for Small-Block Ford 302-331-347 V8

Edelbrock Part # 7521 RPM Air-Gap intake manifold is designed for small-block 302/331/347 Ford V8. Perfect for hot rodders, street machiners, bracket racers or any builder looking for optimum performance in the 1,500-6,500 RPM range.
www.edelbrock.com

Sniper EFI Self Tuning Kits - No Laptop Required

Holley’s Sniper EFI systems bring fuel injection to the masses with carburetor-replacement systems that are designed to have all the benefits of electronic fuel injection without breaking your bank. Perfect for street rods, hot rods, muscle cars, off-roaders and just about any carbureted...
www.holley.com

Please ignore the 61 Corvair in the picture. It was my first car and I scanned both pics when joining stangnet. The black car is that ‘79 Mustang. I am following your build. Please keep up with posting your progress and good luck!
View media item 11237
 

79PaceKar

Advanced Member
Jun 28, 2020
251
311
73
Eugene,, OR
Jul 8, 2020
#7
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #7
Hello. With the help of this sites Tech I have started a better thread:
Oregon Pace Car Story to Coolness
I guess this will be in a better location. Thank you for the information regarding the Edelbrock EFI system. I had forgotten all about those. And, it seems they have a fuel pump to install in my tank. I am going to looking into this. Also, I will look into fuel tank pump. It may be what I was looking for. So, I did not see the Corvair photo. The hood under the scoop on my 79 is cut already. My dad had a Spyder for a while. I used it in high school. Fun to drive Larry
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,872
10,543
203
polk county florida
Jul 8, 2020
#8
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #8
^^^he called me a tech^^^

Progress Thread - Oregon Pace Car Story to Coolness

New Guy here. I am restoring a 79 Pace Car. It was a roller with no engine/trans or interior. I have purchased a 5.0 from a 91 GT. After researching i have decided to convert to a carb from the EFI. Are the heads on the EFI engine compatible with a carburetor? All the other stuff I...
www.stangnet.com
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Jul 8, 2020
#9
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #9
Welcome to Stangnet. If the T-5 is out of a 2003 Mustang, then it's out of a V6 car. Those actually came with the World Class T5 (T5z), so nice score. The input shafts on those are longer, as is the bellhousing. Is it a complete setup with fork and bellhousing? The heads will work, but you will need to plug the thermactor ports on the back of them. That's no big deal. I don't recommend swapping a cam with stock 91' heads; there is no gain in it. I'd bite the bullet and get the Holley Sniper EFI as suggested. Carbs are becoming a lost art, and finding anyone that can dial it in right is tough. You are going to need to change the distributor and ignition system to run it with a carb. Not sure if the Holley Sniper EFI will allow you to run the 91' distributor, but I'm guessing it will. Keep in mind that the 91' engine is an HO, which has a different firing order than what came in a 79' car. Just for future reference. You just have to plug the wires into the distributor in a different sequence. Keep us in the loop. Looks like a great project.

Kurt
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Jul 8, 2020
#10
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #10
General karthief said:
^^^he called me a tech^^^

Progress Thread - Oregon Pace Car Story to Coolness

New Guy here. I am restoring a 79 Pace Car. It was a roller with no engine/trans or interior. I have purchased a 5.0 from a 91 GT. After researching i have decided to convert to a carb from the EFI. Are the heads on the EFI engine compatible with a carburetor? All the other stuff I...
www.stangnet.com
Click to expand...
An obvious blunder.......
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Jul 8, 2020
#11
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #11
revhead347 said:
Welcome to Stangnet. If the T-5 is out of a 2003 Mustang, then it's out of a V6 car. Those actually came with the World Class T5 (T5z), so nice score. The input shafts on those are longer, as is the bellhousing. Is it a complete setup with fork and bellhousing? The heads will work, but you will need to plug the thermactor ports on the back of them. That's no big deal. I don't recommend swapping a cam with stock 91' heads; there is no gain in it. I'd bite the bullet and get the Holley Sniper EFI as suggested. Carbs are becoming a lost art, and finding anyone that can dial it in right is tough. You are going to need to change the distributor and ignition system to run it with a carb. Not sure if the Holley Sniper EFI will allow you to run the 91' distributor, but I'm guessing it will. Keep in mind that the 91' engine is an HO, which has a different firing order than what came in a 79' car. Just for future reference. You just have to plug the wires into the distributor in a different sequence. Keep us in the loop. Looks like a great project.

Kurt
Click to expand...
After about 30 years, you are probably right about the cam. I think I had the Comp cam in the original 302 block, then a stock style roller cam in the 5.0 replacement.
I do think the Air Gap manifold would still be good with aluminum heads if they get upgraded.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Jul 8, 2020
#12
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #12
7991LXnSHO said:
After about 30 years, you are probably right about the cam. I think I had the Comp cam in the original 302 block, then a stock style roller cam in the 5.0 replacement.
I do think the Air Gap manifold would still be good with aluminum heads if they get upgraded.
Click to expand...

The air gap would be fine. I don't keep up on carb intakes these days.

Kurt
 

79PaceKar

Advanced Member
Jun 28, 2020
251
311
73
Eugene,, OR
Jul 8, 2020
#13
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #13
I am trading the T-5 from the 2003 to a T-5 built for a Fox body. Transmission plus cash. Good deal. Looking at the EFI carb option. Larry
 
Reactions: revhead347

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,872
10,543
203
polk county florida
Jul 8, 2020
#14
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #14
You got the fox bell housing?
 

79PaceKar

Advanced Member
Jun 28, 2020
251
311
73
Eugene,, OR
Jul 8, 2020
#15
  • Jul 8, 2020
  • #15
Yes. Now I have an extra V6 bell housing. Anyone need it?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Jul 9, 2020
#16
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #16
The 2003 Transmission is a better transmission. However, if the foxbody one has been upgraded, it's probably just as good.

Kurt
 

79PaceKar

Advanced Member
Jun 28, 2020
251
311
73
Eugene,, OR
Jul 9, 2020
#17
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #17
According to the builder, it has been updated. Thanks for the tip. Larry
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
79 mustang pace car spoiler.
  • Anglosaxon83
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
117
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 21, 2026
Anglosaxon83
A
F
1979 Pace Car Exhaust Question
  • First Mustang
  • Dec 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
235
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 28, 2024
85GTStangGuy
1979 Pace Car Build- #887
  • darryl27529
  • Aug 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
Willybill32
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
514
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?