• Mustang Forums
  • Special Production

Saleen new inlet/intake for Series II

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedS281GT
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 5 of 8 Next Last

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jul 8, 2008
#81
  • Jul 8, 2008
  • #81
pbm.cc said:
What I am really leaning towards is just installing cams on the Saleen! I bet since it already has boost by me adding cams, 66mm pulley, mosaleen idlers and my frpp ceramic coated shorties I will either be higher or about the same as he.
I may need a MAFia and a LMAF, plus I still have room to upgrade the intake and intercooler and heat exchanger.

I still think something is wrong other than the temp. Probably the fuel pump I would go with the twin cobra fuel pumps. Why even bother with another Focus pump.
Click to expand...

Putting cams in a 4.6 ohc engine is far from a cost effective way to get more power.
The cams are expensive, and labor intensive, all for minimum power.
If the engine was getting rebuilt, ya, they are probably worth the trouble, but with the engine in the car, tearing it down to a longblock would not be worth it.

Basically, if someones goals are 425rwhp+, the saleen blower setup is not the way to go, nor is it finally wise to drop loads of money on parts to make it better.
You can sell it, slap a kb or vortech on there, and easily exceed the numbers you can get with the saleen kit.
 
P

pbm.cc

New Member
Jun 24, 2004
79
0
0
Jul 11, 2008
#82
  • Jul 11, 2008
  • #82
2000xp8 said:
Putting cams in a 4.6 ohc engine is far from a cost effective way to get more power.
The cams are expensive, and labor intensive, all for minimum power.
If the engine was getting rebuilt, ya, they are probably worth the trouble, but with the engine in the car, tearing it down to a longblock would not be worth it.

Basically, if someones goals are 425rwhp+, the saleen blower setup is not the way to go, nor is it finally wise to drop loads of money on parts to make it better.
You can sell it, slap a kb or vortech on there, and easily exceed the numbers you can get with the saleen kit.
Click to expand...

Well the Anderson cams that I was looking at cost about $630.00 maybe like $200.00 for springs and retainers. My buddy at Ford house will charge me a 6 pack and a night to use the pool and have a cook out. I already have the 66mm pulley just not installed, I already have the headers just not installed. My buddy at Gearheads in Arlington TX or Manny at HPP can dyno the car with everything installed and we will see who spent more $ and for the most performance.

See that is my thing, I am not going to spent $6k on the KB 2.6 if:
1: I have to get ride of my hood
2: I am still limited by the heat exchanger and intake on the blower
3: pulley pulley pulleys

I would much rather get a Turbo kit for about $3-4k intalled and dynoed. That is why it is very important as to WHO you know! More than WHAT you know....

I can still keep the blower cams that I will have installed on the SOHC heads and being able to use them when I upgrade to the turbo kit wich will alow me to use the stock hood and would limit me less to RWHP/RWTQ. I will only install the headers idler and pulley and twin cobra pumps as I will need the fuel either way and the idler and pulley and headers can be sold again when I install the Turbo kit.
Trick flow make a new intake that is SOMEWHAT like the Bullit and I wanted to go that route. Add the TT single blade tb and buy a built shortblock and I am done.

See, my goal for the Saleen is 550rhwp-600rwhp from the turbo kit and a built short block. Give me a year or year and a half and I will be there.

 
P

pbm.cc

New Member
Jun 24, 2004
79
0
0
Jul 11, 2008
#83
  • Jul 11, 2008
  • #83
+ with a turbo kit you relive crank stress and IT SOUNDS REALLY COOL WHILE SPOOLING UP AND THE BOV! lol
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jul 11, 2008
#84
  • Jul 11, 2008
  • #84
Maybe for you if you are getting labor for free a turbo kit is 3-4 grand installed with a dyno run.
For anyone that has to pay for it, you are looking at leat at 6 grand, and possibly up to 9k.

Me personally i'd rather have an aftercooled vortech than most anything else. (on a 2 valve) on a 3v or 4v i'd rather have a whipple.
 
P

pbm.cc

New Member
Jun 24, 2004
79
0
0
Jul 12, 2008
#85
  • Jul 12, 2008
  • #85
2000xp8 said:
Maybe for you if you are getting labor for free a turbo kit is 3-4 grand installed with a dyno run.
For anyone that has to pay for it, you are looking at leat at 6 grand, and possibly up to 9k.

Me personally i'd rather have an aftercooled vortech than most anything else. (on a 2 valve) on a 3v or 4v i'd rather have a whipple.
Click to expand...

My friend Lance has a turbo shop where he will fabricate the kit.
My friend Robert works fot a Diesel company that he can get any turbo parts from the dealers dirt cheap (including Turbonetics)
My friend Jason will do the labor at Ford house in Dallas.
My friend Chris or Manny will tune it for a good deal.

everything is just parts that I can find for a good price. That is why I am leaning towards it.
I rather do a 2v cause I have never built one, I have had 2 built 4v and the cams will be more noticable on the 2v.

I do like twin screw blowers but the fact remains that you COULD have slippage and Turbos just makes more power for the same amount of boost or less.

I have experimented with ever poweradder and I must say Boost from a Turbo is something you do not forget.
 
P

pbm.cc

New Member
Jun 24, 2004
79
0
0
Jul 18, 2008
#86
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #86
RedS281GT said:
I don't think the clutch is slipping. At least, it didn't smell like it was! I do have the NGK tr6's gapped at 36. Did have a small vaccume leak. It was fixed for the tune, but I will need a more permanent solution. Easy fix!

And from what everyone has posted, it seems like I dynoed my car under the worst possible conditions. No fault to Dynospeed of course! 150 degree IAT's, a heat soaked engine, and 100 degree weather in July! With all that, I still managed 345rwhp! I guess its good to know what I can be guaranteed to have during the summer months!
And I'm not a fan of bench racing, but 65 degree weather and seeing 12 -13lbs of boost might put me over the 400rwhp mark! 10hp for every 10 degrees of temp, and guessing almost 10hp for every additional pound of boost. Didn't know if those two would bleed together or not. And a question on that! My tune is based off of 10lbs of boost! When the months cool down and I do see 12-13lbs, will it cause me to run lean? And should I be concerned about how much power I see over my tune when it cools down?
Click to expand...

Did you do a compression test? vaccum leak test?
 
R

RedS281GT

Member
Sep 2, 2005
30
0
6
Jul 20, 2008
#87
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • #87
I haven't had time to do a compression test, my last semester of grad school is 24/7 right now. I hope to get it done soon though. I did find some vaccum leaks which might explain the bumps in the upper rpm range. I thought we fixed it on the dyno, but it might be coming loose with all the pressure around 5500prm

I did have some time to do a little research: Here's what I found on corral.net!

"When I had the stock Series IV setup, I did a series of 3 street runs from 1-3 gear and saw temps break into the 160-5° area (~80°F ambient). After changing to the Chicane cooler I recall the temps dropping to 130°F. I remember we got about a 35°F delta when we swapped the cooler out."

"A few months ago I did some WOT street runs while data logging information on the stock Series IV SC kit, ambient air temp was ~80°F. The inlet air temperatures jumped into the mid-to-high 160's °F (I think 167/8°F was the hottest run) boost was ~8.5-psig @ 5800-6000-rpms."

My temps were in the 150-160 range with the intercooler, heat soaked, and in 100 degree weather! I really believe that this is the reason I didn't break the 400rwhp mark! The vaccum leak hurt as well! But the intercooler was fighting a losing battle all day. Even with ice, the temps before the runs were at 130!!! I need to go back on a cold day in the winter and see what happens! I think I might need something to keep my temps down during the summer, i.e. smow performance or chiller killer
 
2

2FNFAST

New Member
May 21, 2008
10
0
0
Jul 22, 2008
#88
  • Jul 22, 2008
  • #88


or a 35 shot of juice... Thats what i believe I will be doing.

I can't wait to get myne on the dyno. It took out a 14 psi turbo grand prix gtp to over a buck thirty and when we were logging it says its 20+% too rich (base tune). This was on a predator mind you and no wideband but when it's dialed in i think 400 shouldn't be a problem. only problem is there are no dyno tuners close to here, and i don't have a license for another 37 days.

Im also getting belt slip like a mofo, the mosaleen idler will be ordered before its dynoed. Still Im hittin like 12-13 psi (on the 03 cobra cluster) @ 6grand. And talk about loud, the port makes these things sound NUTS.
 

Attachments

  • 002.webp
    47 KB · Views: 347
M

mat82284

Member
Jul 31, 2003
889
1
16
Jul 29, 2008
#89
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #89
RedS281GT said:
Just wanted everyone know that i'm testing a new experimental intake for my Saleen. It's made by Tork Tech and the quality is amazing! I'll be taking it up to Dynospeed in Memphis for some testing in the next few weeks. Can't wait to see what numbers this thing produces! Enjoy the pics!


00 GT vert
Series II S/C
BBK long tubes & o/r x-pipe, pro 5.0, 3:55's, TT inlet, cobra TB, 66mm pulley,
90mm TB, Chicane intercooler, hand ported lower intake, SCT
Click to expand...

So where can we buy this intake it looks really good!
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 29, 2008
#90
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #90
mat82284 said:
So where can we buy this intake it looks really good!
Click to expand...

Tork Tech Inc.
 
M

mat82284

Member
Jul 31, 2003
889
1
16
Jul 29, 2008
#91
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #91
Gearbanger 101 said:
Tork Tech Inc.
Click to expand...

Thanks but i dont see it on there, just a photo no product. Do you have a direct link?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 29, 2008
#92
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #92
mat82284 said:
Thanks but i dont see it on there, just a photo no product. Do you have a direct link?
Click to expand...

You really need to read this thread from the beginning.

The intake isn't advertised for sale alone, but from what I understand they're willing to sell it on it's own for Saleen guys that want to upgrade their current, restrictive inlet system. Try contacting them directly, or PM the original thread starter to see what it's going for.
 
P

pbm.cc

New Member
Jun 24, 2004
79
0
0
Jul 29, 2008
#93
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #93
what to do? what to do?! I still think that the inlet kit (intake,TB,MAF,ADAPTER and K&N) would be worth it as my car is a real sc281! but I want to be forsure in the 400's! maybe I can guarantee it with the bigger heat exchanger and the cams!? and buy the intercooler... I already have the 66mm pulley, I am getting the gears (either 3:55's or 3:73's) this thursday... alumminum driveshaft... and FRPP ceramic headers, tuned with a predator.

What do yah think? the Inlet kit + 66mm (mosaleen idler) + Chicane intercooler + Cams + Bigger heat exchanger= 400rwhp?!

I will also be taking off the Borla mufflers and putting the Borla stingers on it. Should help for 1rwhp! lol...
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 29, 2008
#94
  • Jul 29, 2008
  • #94
Why not add an electric water pump to your engine. Said to be good for 15rwhp alone.
 

rfedd

Founding Member
Aug 21, 1999
842
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Jul 30, 2008
#95
  • Jul 30, 2008
  • #95
JDM Engineering is testing the TTI setup on the 12th of August and doing a re-tune on the car, since the airflow has increased drastically.

Chris at JDM is running the project.
 
P

pbm.cc

New Member
Jun 24, 2004
79
0
0
Jul 31, 2008
#96
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #96
rfedd said:
JDM Engineering is testing the TTI setup on the 12th of August and doing a re-tune on the car, since the airflow has increased drastically.

Chris at JDM is running the project.
Click to expand...

on RedS281GT car? I really wanted a goal of 400-440rwhp with the eaton M90... if I can guarantee those numbers from the TTI intake setup, intercooler and cams I would jump on it.

If not... then I would not invest on any parts for the motor and just start saving for a turbo kit.

I love all the insite and everyone's opinion on here... I really wanted to keep the M90 as its a real Saleen. Hopefully, if a new entire retune and enough fuel for the air is in RedS281GT's car at the retune... It should get alot better numbers.

Remeber to cool it before dynoing. Good luck bro.:SNSign:
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 31, 2008
#97
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #97
pbm.cc said:
on RedS281GT car? I really wanted a goal of 400-440rwhp with the eaton M90... if I can guarantee those numbers from the TTI intake setup, intercooler and cams I would jump on it.
Click to expand...
I think you're pushing your luck a little with your estimates....especially with the torque values.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jul 31, 2008
#98
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #98
Gearbanger 101 said:
Why not add an electric water pump to your engine. Said to be good for 15rwhp alone.
Click to expand...

I'd say that's a bit of stretch, the water pump on a modular engine turns very easily, and IMO, there is no way it takes 15 hp to turn it.
 

rfedd

Founding Member
Aug 21, 1999
842
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Jul 31, 2008
#99
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #99
1999 Saleen still with the M90. This guy stepped up to the Tork Tech M112, lowered his boost and picked up roughly 100 HP.
So an M90 (ported BTW can also make some nice power.

http://j.mustangcars.com/J/stang/svtsnake/vidz-08/99Saleen.wmv
 
M

mat82284

Member
Jul 31, 2003
889
1
16
Jul 31, 2008
#100
  • Jul 31, 2008
  • #100
rfedd said:
1999 Saleen still with the M90. This guy stepped up to the Tork Tech M112, lowered his boost and picked up roughly 100 HP.
So an M90 (ported BTW can also make some nice power.

http://j.mustangcars.com/J/stang/svtsnake/vidz-08/99Saleen.wmv
Click to expand...

Wait, is his m90 stock? or are you saying he upgraded his mp90 internals with the Tork Tech m112? Is that even possible? Second he had the stock saleen intake tube! So it sounds like a better alternative to spend the money on Cams and the Tork Tech M112 internals. How much does Tork Tech sell it for?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 5 of 8 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
SOLD Trick Flow 351w R series EFI manifold upper and lower NEW In BOX NEVER installed
  • Hizdudeness
  • Mar 6, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Mar 6, 2024
Hizdudeness
H
S
Engine ‘86 gt/ Auto. Low vacuum/ idle surge/ no leaks
  • skyboy666
  • May 19, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 9, 2021
jrichker
The Time Has Come.. Maybe..
  • sarmikgar
  • Nov 17, 2017
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
999
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 19, 2017
General karthief
Engine 2000 Saleen Series I I ; Mil Status Off, Running Rich, Idle High
  • s2s281sc
  • Feb 16, 2016
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
6K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2017
s2s281sc
I
  • Locked
Expired Saleen Series Iv Supercharger Kit W/ Custom Sheetmetal Intake.
  • ItsStock02
  • Oct 2, 2012
  • Engine and Power Adder Parts
Replies
2
Views
6K
Engine and Power Adder Parts Dec 30, 2012
ncalk22
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • Special Production
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?