• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox New (old) Guy Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob F
  • Start date Start date May 14, 2015
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
May 15, 2015
#21
  • May 15, 2015
  • #21
mikestang63 said:
Bob, glad to see another old fart join....

I'm on my third fox vert. You have some decent first mods and a nice clean foundation. Couple of observations.

Replace the 160 thermostat with the stock 192. Contrary to internet myth, the lower stat does not help with cooling. It simply opens the stat at a lower temp and actualy will result in lower mpg, worse performance, and more wear on the motor. Ford engineers put a 192 stat in for a reason.

I'd replace the stock alternator with a 130 amp 3g or 6g one. Not only will that allow you to upgrade your stereo or add things llike an E fan, it will also get rid of the stock fire hazard power wires for the stock 2g.

If you remove the stock car pipe, you may get extra exhaust smell. Know that their is not much to be gained by removing a functioning cat pipe. Now I have removed them on every fox body I've owned, but in Florida there is no smog check and my cars are not stockish or DD.

Welcome and hope you stay a while.
Click to expand...

Thanks for your ideas and I'm sure I will stay a while. As far as the alternator i like that and have been considering an electric fan. I plan on using a good catted h or x pipe like BBK or MAC. and then Flowmasters all the way back. The 160 thermostat I have to say I'm not sure. I understand Ford engineers put in 192, but they also put in 2.73 gears! No disrepect to the engineers I'm just saying they have corporate rules. I had a 160 stat in my 89 LX and never had a problem, and this 88 seems to run great with it. Not driven in winter so no problem with heat. I know what you are saying, but you know the term "Factory Freaks" maybe mine have been like that with 160 stats.
 

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
May 15, 2015
#22
  • May 15, 2015
  • #22
madmike1157 said:
50 is not old. The way you guys are talking, the responsible thing to do is sell the car, and start looking at burial plots.

Even at 69, @jrichker isn't old..........well, on second thought,..yeah he is. Jrichker is old.
Click to expand...
Maybe I will just be buried in my FOX, it probly cost less then a nice casket!
 

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
May 15, 2015
#23
  • May 15, 2015
  • #23
FoxMustangLvr said:
Like so?
Click to expand...
Thanks again for the head's up. My first day on the forum and I post pics of the wheels going the wrong way! I am a little rusty gettin back into the FOX lifestyle/brotherhood.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
May 15, 2015
#24
  • May 15, 2015
  • #24
Bob F said:
I understand Ford engineers put in 192, but they also put in 2.73 gears! No disrepect to the engineers I'm just saying they have corporate rules. I had a 160 stat in my 89 LX and never had a problem, and this 88 seems to run great with it. Not driven in winter so no problem with heat. .
Click to expand...

Different logic than 2.73s though. Modern EFI engines need to run hotter than the older carbed cars. 190-210 degrees is the preferred temp and running too cold can cause just as many issues as running to hot. I'd detail these out but I'm typing on a phone.

There is really no reason to run these engines cold. It doesn't make more power and doesn't create and efficient combustion burn. If overheating is a concern, a lower temp t stat is not the answer.

There's been a trend towards dispelling a lot of traditional "fox power myths" these days, and slapping a 160-180!t stat in is one of them that needs to go away.



Sent from my big ass iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: madmike1157

Jersey Joe

I remember blowing that Monkey's ass
10 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
760
1,280
154
Bloomingdale N.j.
May 16, 2015
#25
  • May 16, 2015
  • #25
Hey an old fart like myself !! Well close, at 47 I'm a relic but I had the privilege of buying my Fox new.
 

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
May 16, 2015
#26
  • May 16, 2015
  • #26
Jersey Joe said:
Hey an old fart like myself !! Well close, at 47 I'm a relic but I had the privilege of buying my Fox new.
Click to expand...
Yeah me too. Ill never forget that day when we brought it home from the dealer. It costed a whopping $17,400. Lol
 
Reactions: Jersey Joe

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
May 16, 2015
#27
  • May 16, 2015
  • #27
Mustang5L5 said:
Different logic than 2.73s though. Modern EFI engines need to run hotter than the older carbed cars. 190-210 degrees is the preferred temp and running too cold can cause just as many issues as running to hot. I'd detail these out but I'm typing on a phone.

There is really no reason to run these engines cold. It doesn't make more power and doesn't create and efficient combustion burn. If overheating is a concern, a lower temp t stat is not the answer.

There's been a trend towards dispelling a lot of traditional "fox power myths" these days, and slapping a 160-180!t stat in is one of them that needs to go away.



Sent from my big ass iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I understand the gears are different logic then a stat, I was just making a point that all original parts are based on emissions, warranty, CAFE, budget, safety etc. For instance, they put drum brakes on the rear not because they are better, but because its easier and cost less. Again it's just my opinion but my Fox's have run great with 160 stat, and I have never had overheating issues with any temp stat.
 

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
May 16, 2015
#28
  • May 16, 2015
  • #28
Jersey Joe said:
Hey an old fart like myself !! Well close, at 47 I'm a relic but I had the privilege of buying my Fox new.
Click to expand...
Nice car Joe! Reminds me of the 89 LX 5.0 Sport I bought new!
 
Reactions: Jersey Joe

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
May 18, 2015
#29
  • May 18, 2015
  • #29
In two days I get the wheels swapped so they are on the correct side! Also I'm gonna get some pics of the shocks, control arms, brakes, rear diff etc. while the car is on the lift. Has not been driven much since the mods and only on dry days so they should be real clean. I will post pics.
 
Reactions: A5literMan
O

oldfordy

Member
Sep 22, 2012
8
12
14
May 18, 2015
#30
  • May 18, 2015
  • #30
OLDFORDY here im 75 your car is m a dead ringer for my 87 vert mine . 410s auto 17in scs. old is in your mind.
 
Reactions: 89oem, A5literMan and FoxMustangLvr

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
May 19, 2015
#31
  • May 19, 2015
  • #31
Yep, I paid 15,000 and change for my vert, was looking at all the old paperwork over the weekend, never thought I'd put that number to shame over time with the car, but heck it's MY Car, rest are just transportation....

Guess we need an oldfart section mods, lol
 
Reactions: A5literMan

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
Jun 11, 2015
#32
  • Jun 11, 2015
  • #32
Here are some new pics with the wheels on the correct side!
 
Reactions: A5literMan, Grabbin' Asphalt, 89oem and 2 others

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
Jun 11, 2015
#33
  • Jun 11, 2015
  • #33
When I installed a 180* stat it ran rich as hell, back to a 192* cause a parking deck and fumes Sux!!
Ran way cool but wasn't worth stops at traffic lights and the windows down. You have a vert, I could only imagine those stops.
Nice car btw!!
 

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
Jun 11, 2015
#34
  • Jun 11, 2015
  • #34
I guess I'm going based on back in the day. My 89 LX had a 100hp shot of NOS among other things (12.7 @ 109 on street tires). I ran 160 stat and a 255 pump to be safe with the NOS, but it ran great without it.
 

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
Jun 11, 2015
#35
  • Jun 11, 2015
  • #35
Lookin good Bob F! Now get a set of springs on that bad boy and lower it's stance.
 

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
Jun 13, 2015
#36
  • Jun 13, 2015
  • #36
I have thought about lowering springs, but I'm worried about tire clearance and under carriage clearance.
 

Onefine88

Previously 89SSC18
10 Year Member
Aug 3, 2006
1,422
796
154
Jun 13, 2015
#37
  • Jun 13, 2015
  • #37
Bob F said:
I have thought about lowering springs, but I'm worried about tire clearance and under carriage clearance.
Click to expand...
Don't be worried about that. Here's a pic of my '88 when it was sitting on Ford racing "B" springs with your same wheels. (I had them on backwards too) LOL
The tries were 245/45's up front with 275/40's on back. It drove great with the '93 Cobra replica's.

I have since swapped to Saleen Racecraft springs with SC replica wheels. The Racecraft springs actually sit just a tad lower up front but ride great with very minimal rubbing only at high speed cornering.
 
Reactions: Bob F

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Jun 14, 2015
#38
  • Jun 14, 2015
  • #38
Bob don't worry about lowering the car. You'll have plenty of clearance Here's my 86 with eibach springs/struts/and shocks. Same size tires as above. Also the struts and shocks are for sale if interested pm me.
 
Reactions: Bob F

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
Jun 16, 2015
#39
  • Jun 16, 2015
  • #39
Onefine88 said:
Don't be worried about that. Here's a pic of my '88 when it was sitting on Ford racing "B" springs with your same wheels. (I had them on backwards too) LOL
The tries were 245/45's up front with 275/40's on back. It drove great with the '93 Cobra replica's.

I have since swapped to Saleen Racecraft springs with SC replica wheels. The Racecraft springs actually sit just a tad lower up front but ride great with very minimal rubbing only at high speed cornering.
Click to expand...
Thanks a lot, now I have to spend more money and get them cause it does look great! My rears are 285/40/17 still should work right?
 

Bob F

Active Member
May 14, 2015
139
58
38
Roscoe IL
Jun 16, 2015
#40
  • Jun 16, 2015
  • #40
A5literMan said:
Bob don't worry about lowering the car. You'll have plenty of clearance Here's my 86 with eibach springs/struts/and shocks. Same size tires as above. Also the struts and shocks are for sale if interested pm me.
Click to expand...
Looks great also. I love the 86 styling and the seats are so soft compared to mine.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
275
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
240
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
G
Expired 2013 Ford Mustang V6 (Grabber Blue) 3:55 gears... Excellent Condition.
  • Grabberblueguy77
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
2
Views
425
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Mar 11, 2026
Grabberblueguy77
G
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
225
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?