• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Digital Tuning New To Mustangs. 5.0 Sn95 Running Rich.

  • Thread starter Thread starter SnowRocker88
  • Start date Start date Apr 10, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
Apr 12, 2012
#21
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #21
I agree about the code reader. My problem is with the Haynes manual. I'm old enough to remember getting Chilton manuals when I first started driving and what was great about them is they'd show you how to do EVERYTHING. But not Haynes, a lot of things they tell you are "beyond the scope of the home mechanic" lol. Still they do offer some good diagrams but all the useful info they offer you can get at veryuseful.com.
 

SnowRocker88

Member
Apr 5, 2012
30
1
8
Greenville, SC
Apr 12, 2012
#22
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #22
toyman said:
Two things are a must have in your tool kit. First an OBDI code reader like this ($25) and a repair manual (Haynes or equivalent). The code reader will let you know what the ECU has logged as sensors being out of the specified parameters and the manual will show you how to do the repair and/or test the electrical component that is suspect. This $50 investment will save you big $$$$'s compared to guessing and throwing new parts on in the hope it will solve the problem.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the link! Yea, I'm all about letting the ECU tell me what's wrong with the car...I learned this early on. I didn't realize OBDI readers were that cheap.
NotA4.6 said:
I agree about the code reader. My problem is with the Haynes manual. I'm old enough to remember getting Chilton manuals when I first started driving and what was great about them is they'd show you how to do EVERYTHING. But not Haynes, a lot of things they tell you are "beyond the scope of the home mechanic" lol. Still they do offer some good diagrams but all the useful info they offer you can get at veryuseful.com.
Click to expand...
I actually agree with this. I had the Haynes for my Explorer back in the day and it was very hit-and-miss. It would have detailed pictures of the dumbest and simplest things then would just have a one-sentence step for something difficult. Example: It shows where to take bolts out of the transmission then says 'disconnect quick-disconnect line for clutch'. Doesn't say where or how or anything like that. I was 16 years old and it took me like a week to figure out what it was telling me to do. Not a fan of Haynes. lol
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Apr 12, 2012
#23
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #23
The point I wanted to make was that a manual, be it a Haynes, Chilton, Ford Service, etc, along with the code reader, are a must have. If anyone is interested in the Ford CD version send me a PM.
 

SnowRocker88

Member
Apr 5, 2012
30
1
8
Greenville, SC
Apr 13, 2012
#24
  • Apr 13, 2012
  • #24
toyman said:
The point I wanted to make was that a manual, be it a Haynes, Chilton, Ford Service, etc, along with the code reader, are a must have. If anyone is interested in the Ford CD version send me a PM.
Click to expand...
Point taken. I may have to get that Ford manual from you. I know having the Toyota manual for my MR2 has saved me TONS.

UPDATE: I got my odometer gear in (as well as a new headlight switch. Haven't installed my coolant temp sender yet but it's next) averaged my fuel after 63 miles or so and it came out to 12.7MPG. This is all city with a decent amount of red lights and some aggressive driving so I'm going to say it's right on for not being tuned up in IDK how long. O2 sensors, plugs, wires, cap and rotor and clean the K&N filter and I'm sure she'll be back up to spec (if she isn't now). I appreciate all the help guys. I guess this just means I have a faulty fuel sender. :/
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
Apr 13, 2012
#25
  • Apr 13, 2012
  • #25
SnowRocker88 said:
I guess this just means I have a faulty fuel sender. :/
Click to expand...

Nah, it just means you drive a Ford. It's probably not faulty.
 

SnowRocker88

Member
Apr 5, 2012
30
1
8
Greenville, SC
Apr 13, 2012
#26
  • Apr 13, 2012
  • #26
NotA4.6 said:
Nah, it just means you drive a Ford. It's probably not faulty.
Click to expand...
It fluctuates tho. By like 1/8th a tank...is that normal? If I replace the fuel pump (eventually) would it be worth the trouble to get a new sender too?
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
Apr 13, 2012
#27
  • Apr 13, 2012
  • #27
Sure, you can replace it while you have the tank down if you want.
 

SnowRocker88

Member
Apr 5, 2012
30
1
8
Greenville, SC
Apr 28, 2012
#28
  • Apr 28, 2012
  • #28
I did change my temp sender btw and it reads the same. I guess the previous owner put a VERY cold thermostat in there. I'm going to swap it for a 190-195 soon.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 28, 2012
#29
  • Apr 28, 2012
  • #29
If you have turn downs, you are going to smell fuel. The MR2 is different because regardless of where it empties out, it's behind the passenger compartment. You don't happen to have a cold air kit on your car do you? Those cold air kits can really mess with the MAF.

I had an MR2 also. That car was a ton of fun. Stock for stock could beat a Mustang every time, and 33mpg on the highway.

I'm blown away by my new engine. It aces emissions, and so far it seems to be sipping the gas. Although I don't have a hard number on consumption yet.

Kurt
 

SnowRocker88

Member
Apr 5, 2012
30
1
8
Greenville, SC
Apr 30, 2012
#30
  • Apr 30, 2012
  • #30
revhead347 said:
If you have turn downs, you are going to smell fuel. The MR2 is different because regardless of where it empties out, it's behind the passenger compartment. You don't happen to have a cold air kit on your car do you? Those cold air kits can really mess with the MAF.

I had an MR2 also. That car was a ton of fun. Stock for stock could beat a Mustang every time, and 33mpg on the highway.

I'm blown away by my new engine. It aces emissions, and so far it seems to be sipping the gas. Although I don't have a hard number on consumption yet.

Kurt
Click to expand...
Na, no CAI. It does have a Vortech MAF housing though. Not sure of the size. I noticed it when cleaning the MAF sensor itself. The sticker on it said "Max Flow".

Yea, my MR2 is actually getting an aluminum V6. Same stock HP as the turbo but more torque...should be a ton of fun. As far as the mustang goes. The mileage isn't bad but the temp is def low which I'm not a fan of. I've ordered a thermostat as well as dizzy cap and rotor and a few other tune-up items. She should be right soon. I did notice I have an intake leak at the PCV connection on the intake elbow. That partially explains the slightly irregular idle. I'm pretty sure the EGR system is screwed (capped on the header, pipe was cut and pinched shut...real ghetto rigged) and I have an exhaust leak on that side of the engine so I'm guessing the plug is a FUBAR job as well. Ugh, people... :/
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
1995 Mustang GT- No PCM Communication, Runs Rich, Lacks power
  • gtrob
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
412
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 31, 2025
Noobz347
K
Electrical 2000 GT Intermittent Engine Shutdown In Motion - DTC U1262
  • kenster1092
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
213
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 24, 2026
squeak93
0
'04 V6 running rich excessively on both banks
  • 04DSGVert
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
351
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Oct 27, 2025
04DSGVert
0
J
Engine Running like crap :(
  • justadude07
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
354
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 19, 2025
DadLife0724
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
216
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?