• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

new to mustangs, just ran mine

  • Thread starter Thread starter jawsgt
  • Start date Start date Sep 23, 2005
J

jawsgt

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
18
0
0
ohio
Sep 23, 2005
#1
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #1
hey guys im new the forums and new to owning a mustang. previous car was a 99 ws-6 trans am M6, it ran 12.5@112 b4 i flipped it a few months ago. so i just bought a 95 gt M5 with a 140k miles on it. completely bone stock not 1 aftermarket part on it and i ran 14.9's consistently. hows that stack up to wut most of these cars run?
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Sep 23, 2005
#2
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #2
That sux. Must be your engine is blown.










J/K. That's in the ball park for a stock 5.0 in good condition. Too bad about the T/A. But welcome to StangNet. And I'm sure you'll find that Mustangs are much easier to work on.
 
J

jawsgt

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
18
0
0
ohio
Sep 23, 2005
#3
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #3
oh ive def found mustangs r much easier to work on. i did my plugs in 20 minutes, try that on an ls1. the only thing i dont like about owning a mustang is for me to go fast i A. either have to go bigger cubes or B. go blown. but as of rite now i am ordering bbk longtubes, offroad h-pipe and bassani catback and a bbk cold air. how well do u think i'll do at the track in a few weeks with that? i also trapped a lil over 93 mph b4 so im hoping to get over 95 mph.

p.s. my trans am did close to 90 mph in the 1/8th mile now im hitting that in the 1/4 so i gatta do sumthing quick
 
8

88GT460

New Member
Sep 23, 2004
338
0
0
Arkansas
Sep 23, 2005
#4
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #4
get some gears. that should be first on your list, but since it isn't.. it should be next. but don't go too low since you are going with long tubes. get 3.55 or 3.73
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Sep 23, 2005
#5
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #5
I don't have a blower or stroker, and I handed a Supra his butt this morning.
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Sep 23, 2005
#6
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #6
14.9 is pretty good for a bone stock application. It was rated at 15.1 in most of the books. Good driving, and welcome to Stangnet!
 
J

jawsgt

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
18
0
0
ohio
Sep 23, 2005
#7
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #7
thanx and i forgot to mention gears, i have 2.73's so im def ganan be swappin those out real soon. every 1 that knows me knows i can drag race, my t/a was just exhaust lid and gears and it ran mid 12's all day.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Sep 23, 2005
#8
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #8
Consistent 14.9's isn't anything to frown upon for a stock 95. I ran a best of 14.79 with mine stock with around 28k miles, but mostly ran 14.9-15 flat. To be running that with 140k, I'm impressed. Some good aluminum heads, intake, and gears, you should be well into the mid 12 second range. Welcome to the dark side btw, it's nice over here
 
J

jawsgt

New Member
Sep 27, 2004
18
0
0
ohio
Sep 23, 2005
#9
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #9
just got back from the track again, ran twice. 14.9291@93.38mph first pass, second pass 14.9290@93.38mph. thats by far the most consistent ive ever been on a back to back pass
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Sep 23, 2005
#10
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #10
Yeah i went 14.8 @94 stock in my GT. Your on the right track.
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
Sep 23, 2005
#11
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #11
Unfortunately Ford never made the 302 as stout as the LTs... ...still can't figure that one out???
Anyway she'll need a few bucks to catch up....Like said, get some 373's in there and that'll liven things up some...
I was never a Ford guy til this car..It was lame for sure stock...but now I love it...Its been a super dependable ride.. parts are failry cheap and abudant, easy to work on...
I opened the hood on my Neice's 95 Z/28 and freaked...screw working on that...

Does this bring back memories...
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player.aspx?fileid=64C18C9C-7620-4EDB-BF5D-BD1C54D4E460

Welcome to the game...
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Sep 24, 2005
#12
  • Sep 24, 2005
  • #12
I like both cars for very different reasons, the trans am's and marrows I like the performance aspect of them, I dont like the price of aftermarket parts for them. I like mustangs for the feel of them, the camaros and am's seem too awkward to drive and a little uncomfortable; although there more comfy than a ferrari and a lambo but would never pass on either one of those! Anyway you have lots and lots of time and money to build that thing up. Just have fun with it, if you dont like it in a month or two, they sell really easy too. Welcome to the boards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
455
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
716
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?