• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

New to the 4.6L gen.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95stocker
  • Start date Start date May 4, 2004

95stocker

New Member
Mar 25, 2003
236
0
0
Rochester
May 4, 2004
#1
  • May 4, 2004
  • #1
As you might have guessed from my login name, I have a 95. Problem is that I need about 3,000 in body work done, and I keep replacing broken or worn out parts since I have 103K on the car. I'm interested in buying a 2000 or newer mustang, but know nothing about the 4.6L engine. It is to my understanding that there are no aftermarket heads available at this time. It would be great if people could post some dyno and strip #'s with their stock heads and internals. Or maybe list the mods with the best gains for the price.

Thanks
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
May 4, 2004
#2
  • May 4, 2004
  • #2
catted x, cat back, MAF, intake plenum, 75mm tb, tb pipe, pulleys
254.5 rwhp / 284 rwtq


I ran 13.706s in 1/4 with just the C&L MAF and Pro 5.0 shifter.

I think there are aftermarket heads, Patriot heads?

If I were to go back and do it again, I'd save for a supercharger. The gains from the little bolt ons were kinda disappointing. Supposedly cams are a good money mod but I don't have the money for that and I wouldn't do the labor myself.
 

95stocker

New Member
Mar 25, 2003
236
0
0
Rochester
May 4, 2004
#3
  • May 4, 2004
  • #3
Yea, so far I'm sold on the simplicity of modifying a 4.6......plus the stock computer is way better than my $hitty EEC-IV. I like the fact that the car would be at least 5 years newer, with more factory horsepower and torque in a lighter car. My friend just sold a red 35th aniversary with 2,500 miles for 18,000. If I had the money it would have been mine!
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
May 4, 2004
#4
  • May 4, 2004
  • #4
95stocker said:
Yea, so far I'm sold on the simplicity of modifying a 4.6......plus the stock computer is way better than my $hitty EEC-IV. I like the fact that the car would be at least 5 years newer, with more factory horsepower and torque in a lighter car. My friend just sold a red 35th aniversary with 2,500 miles for 18,000. If I had the money it would have been mine!
Click to expand...
Wow, that is crazy low mileage
Why'd he sell it?

Oh, stock 5 speed 99+ 4.6L's are ~225-230rwhp.
 
R

rob1

New Member
Mar 18, 2004
94
0
0
Indiana
May 4, 2004
#5
  • May 4, 2004
  • #5
I thought that the 302 made as much power as the 4.6's? Were they not as dependable or as easy to get power out of?
 

VOORHEES

Stangnet's "35th Limited Edition" VIN Guy
15 Year Member
Nov 9, 1999
3,046
36
119
LaGrange, GA
May 4, 2004
#6
  • May 4, 2004
  • #6
I went from a stock 94 GT to a stock 99 GT and I sometimes miss the look of the 94, I still think the 99 has a more aggressive look.
The engines are world apart however.
-Jason
 

95stocker

New Member
Mar 25, 2003
236
0
0
Rochester
May 4, 2004
#7
  • May 4, 2004
  • #7
rob1 said:
I thought that the 302 made as much power as the 4.6's? Were they not as dependable or as easy to get power out of?
Click to expand...

My 95 5.0 came with 215hp from the factory (pathetic). The reason for this is because Ford's h/c/i combination is piss poor unless you have an svt product. I want to start with something that is newer and more advanced from the factory instead of spending money upgrading everything on the car just to get it to the specs of a new GT. The problem is not getting power out of the 5.0, there is tons of potential in a 302. How much money you want to spend to turn that potential into a reality is another thing. Starting with a 2002 GT and a supercharger I will have spent thousands less than trying to work on my 5.0. (yea, I could drop a 347 in the car and there would be no contest, but work and college don't allow for that kind of time and lack of a car for an extended amount of time)
 

95stocker

New Member
Mar 25, 2003
236
0
0
Rochester
May 4, 2004
#8
  • May 4, 2004
  • #8
JonJon said:
Wow, that is crazy low mileage
Why'd he sell it?

Oh, stock 5 speed 99+ 4.6L's are ~225-230rwhp.
Click to expand...

He sold it for the same reason he sold me his 95. A massive speeding ticket, a smaller speeding ticket, and an underage drinking citation(he's of age now and got out of it, because apparently it's not illegal to walk to the gas station at 2am dead sober....lol, and the officer was put on a manditory leave for a week).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
402
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
457
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
431
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?