• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Newb question (drop-in motors)

  • Thread starter Thread starter AquamanCHS
  • Start date Start date May 8, 2004
A

AquamanCHS

New Member
Sep 17, 2003
122
0
0
N. VA
May 8, 2004
#1
  • May 8, 2004
  • #1
Disclaimer: I'm a huuuge newb when it comes to anything but a new 4.6, so bear with me, I'm trying to learn.

Okay, my question:

How feasible is it to just take a 66-69 stang and drop in a 4.6 (specifically an '03 Mach 1) crate engine? What would it take to do this? Would it even fit? Also, how much would a 66-69 with a body that's in fairly good shape but non-running motor run?

Again, remember, I = newb.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
May 8, 2004
#2
  • May 8, 2004
  • #2
well, 65-66 would require extensive modifications because the engine bay is too skinny. ON a 67-69, I believe that the 4.6 barely fits. Of course, you would have to do all of the wiring and all of the special exhaust work. To swap in a 265hp engine (late model mach I), its kind of ridiculous....except for a 'wow' factor.

a 65-69 mustang as a rolling chassis....can run anywhere from $500-$5000. The early models also have some flaws that usually need to be taken care of, especially if you want to buy one in the condition which you described. New floor pans, a cowl repair...can end up being very costly (in excess of $2500), unless you can do it yourself.


welcome to the classics forums
 
A

AquamanCHS

New Member
Sep 17, 2003
122
0
0
N. VA
May 8, 2004
#3
  • May 8, 2004
  • #3
allcarfan said:
To swap in a 265hp engine (late model mach I), its kind of ridiculous....except for a 'wow' factor.

...

welcome to the classics forums
Click to expand...

265? The Mach 1 is rated at 305hp and is generally underrated. The PI 4.6 SOHC engines are at ~260. Also, why would it be rediculous? I'm curious.

And thanks for the welcome
 

Irv

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2000
118
0
0
KS
May 8, 2004
#4
  • May 8, 2004
  • #4
isn't the 4.6 alot heavier? I would think that beefing up the suspension might be in order also. I think it would be easier & more seneible to build a 351w or something like that. I know people have done 4.6 swap, but there alot more involved than just "making it fit", an old V8 make more sense IMHO.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
May 8, 2004
#5
  • May 8, 2004
  • #5
ok...305hp.....

so...a few grand for a modular engine, a few grand in mods to get it to fit and run....Just not worth it in my opinion. There are others on this board that would disagree.

for 3 grand, you can get a complete 345hp 5.0. All you have to add is an intake, carb, and dist and off you go. Much cheaper, more hp, better fit!
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
May 9, 2004
#6
  • May 9, 2004
  • #6
I agree with allcar. Not only is the motor wider than a 460, there were never any carbureted versions, so you need a computer, all the sensor, the wiring, fuel lines and tank for fuel injection, cutting the shock towers, etc etc.

If unique is what you seek, and you are made of cash, go for it.
 

none67

New Member
Oct 19, 2003
352
0
0
May 9, 2004
#7
  • May 9, 2004
  • #7
ah.. but remember, unique is not always good.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
May 9, 2004
#8
  • May 9, 2004
  • #8
PS: There are dyno proven combos that can be built from start to finish for under $4000 and will give you almost 400hp to the wheels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
206
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
568
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
268
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
B
Pi swap questions
  • BeardIsRed
  • Oct 22, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
955
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 29, 2022
COramprat
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?