• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

NO MO SHO!

  • Thread starter Thread starter SHOJOE
  • Start date Start date May 27, 2009

SHOJOE

New Member
Dec 11, 2008
20
0
0
Maryland
May 27, 2009
#1
  • May 27, 2009
  • #1
Sold my 1993 Taurus SHO and bought this!

1985 GT w/306


More pics to come later. I live in Maryland and am pretty new to the forum, this is my third mustang having owned two previously a 95 Gt and a 86 LX. I live in Maryland so if anyone wants to turn a wrench or hit the track im down. Let me know what yall think.
 

Aaron

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 5, 2003
94
35
38
Buffalo, NY
May 27, 2009
#2
  • May 27, 2009
  • #2
Post more pics! I like what I see so far
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
May 27, 2009
#3
  • May 27, 2009
  • #3
Definitely a good trade.

'85 GT =
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
May 27, 2009
#4
  • May 27, 2009
  • #4
where u at in md?
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
May 27, 2009
#5
  • May 27, 2009
  • #5
I love the looks of the 85/86 GTs I would love an 86 T-top just cause I dont care for carbs.
Not to hijack but is the 86 EFI engine the same as 87-88s? Or is it the older heads?
 

Aaron

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 5, 2003
94
35
38
Buffalo, NY
May 27, 2009
#6
  • May 27, 2009
  • #6
86 heads are not the same as 87+ heads.
 

DARCA

New Member
Nov 19, 2008
61
0
0
Tacoma, WA
May 27, 2009
#7
  • May 27, 2009
  • #7
Aaron said:
86 heads are not the same as 87+ heads.
Click to expand...

+1, I'll go find out what they are.
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
May 27, 2009
#8
  • May 27, 2009
  • #8
LaserSVT said:
I love the looks of the 85/86 GTs I would love an 86 T-top just cause I dont care for carbs.
Not to hijack but is the 86 EFI engine the same as 87-88s? Or is it the older heads?
Click to expand...

'86 GT's had those weird one-off heads and flat-top pistons. They weren't awful, really, but they weren't as good as the E7's they used in '87+ models, and the flat-top pistons really limit your cam and valvetrain options until you either trade out the pistons or cut some valve reliefs. The ONLY reason I ditched my '86 GT was because I was totally starting to hate the whole 'vert experience - mechanically speaking, though, I totally traded down when I got my CFI '84.

'85 GT's were a mixed bag in that they could have either that bastard-creation non-roller CFI 5.0 like what I have in my '84, except with a single in-tank pump and a quasi-dual exhaust (2-into-1-into-2), or you could have the Holley carb'ed roller 5.0 with a T-5 - dunno if they came with true duals or not factory, but if not then at least it's easy to put 'em on there.

I'm not wild about carbs, either, but there's a lot more easy-to-build potential in an '85 GT than an '86 GT or a CFI '84-'85 5.0 - ANY can be built, but with an '85, it's sooooooo much easier to make 'em faster with a handful of easy bolt-ons that don't involve tearing apart the motor or re-engineering the fuel system.

In any case ... '85 GT + T-tops + 306 =
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
May 27, 2009
#9
  • May 27, 2009
  • #9
SHOJOE said:
I live in Maryland so if anyone wants to turn a wrench or hit the track im down. Let me know what yall think.
Click to expand...

If you are coming up to Atco, let me know. IIRC, Atco is 3 ft above sea level. Makes for some good times.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
May 27, 2009
#10
  • May 27, 2009
  • #10
Darkwriter77 said:
'86 GT's had those weird one-off heads and flat-top pistons. They weren't awful, really, but they weren't as good as the E7's they used in '87+ models, and the flat-top pistons really limit your cam and valvetrain options until you either trade out the pistons or cut some valve reliefs. The ONLY reason I ditched my '86 GT was because I was totally starting to hate the whole 'vert experience - mechanically speaking, though, I totally traded down when I got my CFI '84.

'85 GT's were a mixed bag in that they could have either that bastard-creation non-roller CFI 5.0 like what I have in my '84, except with a single in-tank pump and a quasi-dual exhaust (2-into-1-into-2), or you could have the Holley carb'ed roller 5.0 with a T-5 - dunno if they came with true duals or not factory, but if not then at least it's easy to put 'em on there.

I'm not wild about carbs, either, but there's a lot more easy-to-build potential in an '85 GT than an '86 GT or a CFI '84-'85 5.0 - ANY can be built, but with an '85, it's sooooooo much easier to make 'em faster with a handful of easy bolt-ons that don't involve tearing apart the motor or re-engineering the fuel system.

In any case ... '85 GT + T-tops + 306 =
Click to expand...
So if I brought this one with me I would have to put a seat cover on it before I let you drive it?
Cars For Sale: Car Details - AutoTrader.com
 

Coast2CoaStang

Member
Aug 11, 2008
254
4
19
May 27, 2009
#11
  • May 27, 2009
  • #11
Sweet deal . Is that the original paint? Looks super straight.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
May 27, 2009
#12
  • May 27, 2009
  • #12
LaserSVT said:
So if I brought this one with me I would have to put a seat cover on it before I let you drive it?
Cars For Sale: Car Details - AutoTrader.com
Click to expand...

That, and an aero nose.
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
May 27, 2009
#13
  • May 27, 2009
  • #13
LaserSVT said:
So if I brought this one with me I would have to put a seat cover on it before I let you drive it?
Cars For Sale: Car Details - AutoTrader.com
Click to expand...

WANT
 

SHOJOE

New Member
Dec 11, 2008
20
0
0
Maryland
May 28, 2009
#14
  • May 28, 2009
  • #14
I am located in ellicott city MD, anyone have a good shop that does gears? Yes the paint is 100% original with a very straight body. I will definitly post more pics.


 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
May 28, 2009
#15
  • May 28, 2009
  • #15
Love those seats...
 

MAC'n89Blckstng

Active Member
Jun 11, 2003
1,012
3
36
NJ
May 28, 2009
#16
  • May 28, 2009
  • #16
Good idea on bagging the SHO, I had one and it was a huge headache, fun cars but they are headaches for sure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
New daily driver help needed.....not a mustang but mustang drivetrain.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
5K
Other Auto Tech Jul 28, 2024
manicmechanic007
R
Dad's '82 GT
  • rice_man
  • Mar 7, 2023
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
2K
The Welcome Wagon Mar 8, 2023
rice_man
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?