• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

numbers###

  • Thread starter Thread starter DDSTANG94
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2007

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Aug 31, 2007
#1
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #1
what kind of rear wheel power numbers would i put down with a kenne Bell and AFR 165's with the supporting mods on a 94 GT?? .. My guess is 400 the wheels tops.....but i dont want anymore then that because of reliability issues. Also kind of boost would i put down with that the heads there...???
\
THANKS GUYS
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 31, 2007
#2
  • Aug 31, 2007
  • #2
DDSTANG94 said:
what kind of rear wheel power numbers would i put down with a kenne Bell and AFR 165's with the supporting mods on a 94 GT?? .. My guess is 400 the wheels tops.....but i dont want anymore then that because of reliability issues. Also kind of boost would i put down with that the heads there...???
\
THANKS GUYS
Click to expand...


400 or a bit less sounds like the range you could expect

I don't know the answer to your boost Q
but
I'm gonna have you think about that Q a bit with these thoughts

Consider this about boost and the amount you might see on a gauge

Say you have a stocker Stang and you put out 10lbs

Take that same Stang and install h/c/i and all supporting mods
with the same blower setup.

The motor has become more efficient
and
You will now see less than 10lbs

Is that good or bad

Where I'm going with this is
amount of boost is not totally indicative of making horse power

Also ... with a KB ... the small blower can run outta breath if you got it all
setup with h/c/i

Grady
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Sep 1, 2007
#3
  • Sep 1, 2007
  • #3
i got ya Grady, it will see less boost with them heads because there will be less "pressure" in the engine, its not as restrictive.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 1, 2007
#4
  • Sep 1, 2007
  • #4
DDSTANG94 said:
i got ya Grady, it will see less boost with them heads because there will be less "pressure" in the engine, its not as restrictive.
Click to expand...

That is exactly where I was going

Now ... if say you could bring back up that combo with h/c/i to 10lbs again
and
The blower was still in its effective range of output

Well ... thats just a different way to show
10lbs is not just 10lbs in different combos

Thats why you see a lot of the time
a guy has a good bit of boost on a stocker ......
its so restrictive

Grady
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Sep 1, 2007
#5
  • Sep 1, 2007
  • #5
DDSTANG94 said:
what kind of rear wheel power numbers would i put down with a kenne Bell and AFR 165's with the supporting mods on a 94 GT?? .. My guess is 400 the wheels tops.....but i dont want anymore then that because of reliability issues. Also kind of boost would i put down with that the heads there...???
\
THANKS GUYS
Click to expand...

My cousin made 396rwhp with 6lbs of boost on a stock bottom end '94 with an FTI custom cam and a holley systemax I lower intake. he has since switched to a GT40 lower with a flowzilla manifold, but he hasn't re-dyno'd the car. With his "old" combo I lit the tires up in 3rd gear at around 75mph... it was one white knuckle drive I never want to have again.
 

SVT3183

Member
Mar 30, 2005
180
0
16
S Jersey
Sep 2, 2007
#6
  • Sep 2, 2007
  • #6
i made 330/380 at 7# with my KB 1.7 and a completely stock cobra motor. i'm throwing on 165 ped mount and a tmoss ported lower in a few weeks so i guess i'll see what the increase is. i don's see why this and a good cam couldn't easily get you to 400. i'm hoping to be around there with the stock cam.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
232
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
D
96 get convertible-sell or part out?
  • DTCstang
  • May 17, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
67
What is it Worth?!?!? May 18, 2026
nickyb
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
208
What is it Worth?!?!? May 11, 2026
ctandc
C
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
369
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 5, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?