• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

ODB1 or ODB2

  • Thread starter Thread starter enyawix
  • Start date Start date Sep 9, 2007

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Sep 9, 2007
#1
  • Sep 9, 2007
  • #1
What "ford" engine management system. would you pick and why?
I am building a kit car and have not decided on an engine management system.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Sep 9, 2007
#2
  • Sep 9, 2007
  • #2
What type of engine? It'd be a huge PITA to run a built 5.0 with an OBDII system, since the only ones I'm aware of that had it were Explorer and Mountaineer. I'm not too sure about tuning one of those, but they were also DIS ignition, so you may have trouble running a distributor. Sounds like a lot of work to me, so I'd choose the OBDI.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Sep 9, 2007
#3
  • Sep 9, 2007
  • #3
Yeah, OBD1 would be much easier.
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Sep 9, 2007
#4
  • Sep 9, 2007
  • #4
StangGT1995 said:
What type of engine? It'd be a huge PITA to run a built 5.0 with an OBDII system, since the only ones I'm aware of that had it were Explorer and Mountaineer. I'm not too sure about tuning one of those, but they were also DIS ignition, so you may have trouble running a distributor. Sounds like a lot of work to me, so I'd choose the OBDI.
Click to expand...


mild 351 with distributor twin turbo. thinking 1996 f150 computer.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Sep 9, 2007
#5
  • Sep 9, 2007
  • #5
Ah, didn't think about that. For some reason I was thinking the F150 went to the 4.6 in 96. Talk to a tuner to see what they can do for ya with that computer before you bite the bullet and do it, but if it's doable, I think that could very well be the way to go.
 

slvrsn95

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
28
0
1
Sep 10, 2007
#6
  • Sep 10, 2007
  • #6
Don't know your location however seems OBD1 is exempt from the sniffer police in alot of states.
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Sep 11, 2007
#7
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #7
I live in TN no smog testing
 

97vertstang

Member
Aug 17, 2005
85
0
6
fontana ca
Sep 11, 2007
#8
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #8
Old Dirty Bastard is dead,



anyways, obd1
 

cjones

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
1,561
0
37
Avondale, AZ
Sep 11, 2007
#9
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #9
i guess i'm going against the grain.

i'd go with OBDII. more programming options (98 and up, 96-97 comps suck), diagnostics i feel are easier, there are a number of people running 5.0s with DIS or COP. a person on this forum or allfordmustangs makes brackets for DIS and COP. you can pull the sensors and harness from a 98 explorer.
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Sep 11, 2007
#10
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #10
I want a distributor so I can use an MSD box. What programming options? what was wrong with 96-97?
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Sep 11, 2007
#11
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #11
I dont understand why you wouldnt run a mustang EEC-IV system? A9L computer and fox wiring harness. You dont want additional sensors do you?
 

cjones

Founding Member
Jul 20, 2002
1,561
0
37
Avondale, AZ
Sep 11, 2007
#12
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #12
Ninety15.0: that's my opinion, i'm extremely comfortable with vehicle computer systems.

enyawix: there's nothing wrong with OBDI but if i was starting from scratch i would use OBDII with COP. since you want to run a distributor then go with OBDI. if you're thinking of running a carb, you could run just a Duraspark II ignition.

i remember the OBDII having more program parameters that could be tweaked. i don't remember specifics because it's been about 3 years since i did them.

the 96-97 computers used parametes/settings from the 95 and prior 5.0L cars on a 4.6L engine. in 98 ford changed the programming specifically for the 4.6L series.
 
5

5.0ina66

Member
Jun 6, 2003
664
0
16
Ohio
Sep 11, 2007
#13
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #13
Screw Ford, I'd run a Megasquirt II and Ms'n'TFI code, or use MS'n'EDIS code and go distibutorless with Exploder parts. The Megasquirt/EDIS combo works great under boost too.
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Sep 11, 2007
#14
  • Sep 11, 2007
  • #14
I should say what this is going into. I am building a kit car. an AC Cobra.
Megasquirt did come to mind
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
906
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
R
electrical plug identification
  • redlineracing1328
  • Jun 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
114
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 12, 2026
keel
4
Drivetrain Wilwood Clutch and Brake Pedal Combo Installation - Help
  • 427stang
  • Jul 8, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
61
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2026
427stang
4
J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
204
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
193
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?