• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

official afr 165 vs trick flow twisted wedge poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter payupsucka
  • Start date Start date Dec 9, 2005

what head do you think is better

  • afr 165

    Votes: 12 31.6%
  • tfs twisted wedge

    Votes: 26 68.4%

  • Total voters
    38

payupsucka

Member
Sep 28, 2003
324
0
16
Keeping it grimy in Fall river MA.
Dec 9, 2005
#1
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #1
which one do you go with?

me tfs for life
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 9, 2005
#2
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #2
T minus 1 day until this thread is a 2+ page flame war.

I use twisted wedges on my car but I would have no problems running a done right prepped afr 185 or an afr 205 on it.
 
9

9 Deuce GT

Member
Dec 10, 2003
550
1
16
Geneva, NY
Dec 10, 2005
#3
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #3
This is gonna get ugly!

Anywho, I am currently running AFR 165's, but I would not hesitate to run TW's on another combo. Both heads are great, yet not comparable.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 10, 2005
#4
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #4
Out of the box performance and power under the curve - AFR's get my vote.

Portability and price - Trickflow would get my vote.
 

mustangramair

Member
Feb 24, 2004
326
0
17
Iowa
Dec 10, 2005
#5
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #5
I have TFS twisted wedge and love them, that is why i voted for them. As for AFR i have heard nothing but good things so i would run those if i didn't get my TFS.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Dec 10, 2005
#6
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #6
if the afr185s were a choice i would have voted for them....they honestly should be a choice seeing that they are only like 70$ higher in price
 

TT91

Active Member
May 23, 2003
1,536
0
36
Paramus, NJ
Dec 10, 2005
#7
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #7
5spd GT said:
Portability and price - Trickflow would get my vote.
Click to expand...

Trick flows are more portable then AFRs?....

TW for me.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 10, 2005
#8
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #8
TT91 said:
Trick flows are more portable then AFRs?....

TW for me.
Click to expand...

Yep, more porting meat.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Dec 10, 2005
#9
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #9
TT91 said:
Trick flows are more portable then AFRs?....

TW for me.
Click to expand...
yes....the ports on the afrs are nearly perfect right out of the box
 

CoupedUp

Banned
Aug 26, 2005
260
0
0
Gone Fishing
Dec 10, 2005
#10
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #10
Based on all the relative testing I've read I'm not able to vote yet because I don't know the rest of the combo crapola

AFR - TW
1.90" - 2.02" valve
.750" - .625" deck thickness
$1400 - $1100


 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 10, 2005
#11
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #11
How much lift can the TW head take? I know the AFR's aren't meant for anything over .550 lift. AFR's go for $1285 assembled.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 10, 2005
#12
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #12
5spd GT said:
How much lift can the TW head take? I know the AFR's aren't meant for anything over .550 lift. AFR's go for $1285 assembled.
Click to expand...

Depends if you're talking about stock pistons or not. If you are, it depends on the cam The stock junk TW springs are good for .540" lift. They're 110lbs on the seat if I recall. My old cam was 224/228* 547/536 and cleared fine on stock slugs with the heads milled .020". (Not that the .050" specs tell us much in terms of p to v clearance but its what most people look at when looking @ camshafts) You can thoretically run .700" lift and it can clear with the proper events or you can run .499" and have it hit. Depends.

I paid $935 for my TW heads years ago but since then the price of aluminum has gone up.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Dec 10, 2005
#13
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #13
TFS,but Track Heats....

And our race heads are TFSR's

btw,this is a cursed topic

:SNSign:
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 10, 2005
#14
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #14
Grn92LX said:
Depends if you're talking about stock pistons or not. If you are, it depends on the cam The stock junk TW springs are good for .540" lift. They're 110lbs on the seat if I recall. My old cam was 224/228* 547/536 and cleared fine on stock slugs with the heads milled .020". (Not that the .050" specs tell us much in terms of p to v clearance but its what most people look at when looking @ camshafts) You can thoretically run .700" lift and it can clear with the proper events or you can run .499" and have it hit. Depends.

I paid $935 for my TW heads years ago but since then the price of aluminum has gone up.
Click to expand...

I was talking about the peak lift the spring can take on the head. Not talking about cams. I was going to use it as a price comparison. The AFR's are $1285 with the .550 lift springs. Just wondering what the now-a-day going price was for TW's.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Dec 10, 2005
#15
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #15
5spd GT said:
I was talking about the peak lift the spring can take on the head. Not talking about cams. I was going to use it as a price comparison. The AFR's are $1285 with the .550 lift springs. Just wondering what the now-a-day going price was for TW's.
Click to expand...

I paid $1137 for my TW's shipped to my door, this summer. From Summit. If AFR's were closer in price you could compare the two... but paying more for CNC'd heads aint worth it when todays casting technology works pretty damn good. Just cast them correctly at the foundry and you dont have to do all the fancy machining. Especially for street/strip hardware, it isnt necessary except where you're fighting your competitors for every last HP within a strict set of rules.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 11, 2005
#16
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #16
So afr's are about $1285 shipped and TW's are about 1,130 shipped. Not that big of a difference in price. On my budget I still went with AFR's. They are both excellent heads to say the least.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale Trick Flow Box R Series Upper Intake w/90 mm Inlet
  • Habu135
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
195
Engine and Power Adder Jun 11, 2026
Habu135
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
560
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
265
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
72
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?