• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Oil burning 5.0, can it be diagnosed without tearing bottom end down?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dstang01
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Oct 30, 2009
#1
  • Oct 30, 2009
  • #1
So my 5.0 burns oil, about a quart every 600 miles. A little background, the car has 70,000 miles on it, compression is excellent on every cylinder, and one spark plug appeared oil fouled. It only seems to smoke on a hard accel or a downshift, this points to rings but it seems wierd that one plug is fouled and all the compression is so good. I was thinking maybe the valve seal on that cylinder, and was hoping to do an H/C/I.

Now this is a gamble, because if I set up my H/C/I and it still burns oil, Ill have to tear it down again to rebuild. I'd like to avoid rebuilding if I can, or tearing down the bottom end. Is there a way to spot bottom end issues looking into the bores when the heads are off (any give aways/hints to look for), or do you have to do a full tear down to diagnose?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 30, 2009
#2
  • Oct 30, 2009
  • #2
If it were the seals ............

You'll have new ones when you go with new heads

Grady
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Oct 30, 2009
#3
  • Oct 30, 2009
  • #3
final5-0 said:
If it were the seals ............

You'll have new ones when you go with new heads

Grady
Click to expand...

That's exactly my point, I'm hoping I can kill 2 birds with one stone with my H/C/I, more power and stopping my oil issue That is... if valve seals are the problem

On the contrary, if rings are the problem, I'd hate to bolt up a nice new H/C/I only to still burn oil. Probably burn more oil too with the H/C/I than the stock setup due to higher cylinder pressures

Thats why I'm hoping theres a way to tell if its rings without pulling the motor.
 

Labora

Founding Member
Jun 11, 2000
1,854
26
69
Dallas, Texas
Oct 30, 2009
#4
  • Oct 30, 2009
  • #4
I'm sure you've already checked. But make sure your PCV is good, it doesn't usually cause issues during decel but it can put undue pressure on things elsewhere.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 30, 2009
#5
  • Oct 30, 2009
  • #5
its dumb to risk it... if i were doing HCI on an oil burning engine it would be getting new rings no questions asked.
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Oct 30, 2009
#6
  • Oct 30, 2009
  • #6
I had the same dilemma with my old GT, but in my case the engine had a nice clanking noise going on. My mechanic said it was worn crank bearings, but I thought it was something in the valve train. So I tore off the top end to rebuild the heads. I got lucky; I decided to do things the right way and pulled the shortblock out to rebuild it as well. Turns out my crank bearings WERE worn - plenty of brass showing.

You're already partway there, best to rebuild the whole engine and know it's all good.
 
T

tderrick

Member
Oct 27, 2004
312
0
17
Oct 30, 2009
#7
  • Oct 30, 2009
  • #7
You could run a wet / dry compression test on the cylinders ...

Compression test dry, then add some motor oil to the cylinders via plugs holes. Any improvement seen would imply rings. #'s the same, valve related....
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Oct 30, 2009
#8
  • Oct 30, 2009
  • #8
tderrick said:
You could run a wet / dry compression test on the cylinders ...

Compression test dry, then add some motor oil to the cylinders via plugs holes. Any improvement seen would imply rings. #'s the same, valve related....
Click to expand...

Correct me if Im wrong, but isn't a wet compression is used to rule out rings vs. valves, IF the dry compression is bad? In my case, all the cylinders fall between 150 and 155 on a dry. If it was rings, wouldn't the dry show it?

Check out my plugs too, the fouled one is from cylinder 3. Im not sure what this means, the cylinder had just as good compression as the others so I figure it MUST be valve related.

 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 30, 2009
#9
  • Oct 30, 2009
  • #9
dstang01 said:
Correct me if Im wrong, but isn't a wet compression is used to rule out rings vs. valves, IF the dry compression is bad? In my case, all the cylinders fall between 150 and 155 on a dry. If it was rings, wouldn't the dry show it?

Check out my plugs too, the fouled one is from cylinder 3. Im not sure what this means, the cylinder had just as good compression as the others so I figure it MUST be valve related.
Click to expand...


No not if all the rings are equally bad. a wet test is the best way to tell... but like i said to be safe id just rering and rebearing the bottom end.
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Oct 31, 2009
#10
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #10
How hard of a job is it to re-ring the stock pistons? There are fairly inexpensive re-ring kits around, can you just drop the pan, unbolt the rods and slide the pistons out the top (with heads off) with the engine still in the car? Is it even worth doing this if I dont pull the engine and bore .030 over?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 31, 2009
#11
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #11
Wonder if you'd be money ahead with a junk yard explorer sb
that had low mileage

Grady
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 31, 2009
#12
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #12
final5-0 said:
Wonder if you'd be money ahead with a junk yard explorer sb
that had low mileage

Grady
Click to expand...

and put a decent cam in it.... and be done..
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
Connecticut
Oct 31, 2009
#13
  • Oct 31, 2009
  • #13
dstang01 said:
How hard of a job is it to re-ring the stock pistons? There are fairly inexpensive re-ring kits around, can you just drop the pan, unbolt the rods and slide the pistons out the top (with heads off) with the engine still in the car? Is it even worth doing this if I dont pull the engine and bore .030 over?
Click to expand...

I believe the stock rods won't fit out of the bores on the top. You'd have to push the rods as far as they will go to the top, take the pistons off and slide the rods out of the bottom....all while working around our bulky k member.
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Nov 3, 2009
#14
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #14
Awwww man, nothing's ever easy with stangs

At this point I'm wondering if its worth it to install the H/C/I for this winter's project with the short block as is, if it solves my problem then great

If not, I'll live with it for the year, then pull the motor and do a rebuild/ mild stroker next winter, the trickflow top end can be used for a 331/347 too (not to mention it's porting potential)

Honestly though, with excellent compression accross all 8 and that one fouled plug, I'm thinking it MUST be in the heads (unless I somehow cracked an oil ring in that cylinder, while the compression ring is in tact)
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Nov 3, 2009
#15
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #15
Sounds like u have your mind set.



Not sure how many options you will have up there for explorer motors...definitely a good option. I went this route for $500. Although....u could get a block with the same issues.
 
G

GDTrumbo

Member
Jan 22, 2009
199
0
17
Nashville, TN
Nov 3, 2009
#16
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #16
dstang01 said:
Correct me if Im wrong, but isn't a wet compression is used to rule out rings vs. valves, IF the dry compression is bad? In my case, all the cylinders fall between 150 and 155 on a dry. If it was rings, wouldn't the dry show it?

Check out my plugs too, the fouled one is from cylinder 3. Im not sure what this means, the cylinder had just as good compression as the others so I figure it MUST be valve related.
Click to expand...

Have you checked your 150 to 155 psi readings against shop manual specs? If the 155 psi reading falls within spec and you have no cylinder down more that 10% of the others, your good. 70K is not a lot of miles by any means.

Try your test again. Remove All plugs and during each cyl. test, let it
turn over a good 6 or 7 times.

I think your probably seeing valve guide and seal wear.


GT
 
D

dstang01

Member
Sep 22, 2005
170
0
16
Vancouver, BC
Nov 3, 2009
#17
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #17
Thats what I'm thinking, just doesn't make sense to me to have ring issues yet. The owner before me was middle aged and had to get rid of the car for a minivan for his growing family, didn't seem like the kind of guy who beat the car to a pulp, but I guess you never know

The explorer thing is attractive, especially because you could replace the cam and springs and have a nice street motor. They aren't common at all up here in Canada though (my friend from washington has one, and I joke about swapping our engines when she's out of town ) plus you can't be sure the "new" engine is any more problem-free than the last without tearing it down, in which case you might as well just do so with your stock engine

I'll run a wet compression test and see if my pressures increase, and maybe a leakdown to be sure. Has anyone actually had a case of their oil rings going bad, but their compression rings still in tact?
 

79'293stang

Active Member
Jan 5, 2003
505
11
29
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Nov 3, 2009
#18
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #18
Valve seals aren't hard, time consuming or expensive to change...Just install some new seals and if the smoking stops your in the green.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 3, 2009
#19
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #19
TrueBlue95GT said:
I believe the stock rods won't fit out of the bores on the top. You'd have to push the rods as far as they will go to the top, take the pistons off and slide the rods out of the bottom....all while working around our bulky k member.
Click to expand...

Na, that's not true at all. You generally brake down the rod and piston with a press which you couldn't with it still in the block.

Kurt
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 3, 2009
#20
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #20
dstang01 said:
Awwww man, nothing's ever easy with stangs

At this point I'm wondering if its worth it to install the H/C/I for this winter's project with the short block as is, if it solves my problem then great

If not, I'll live with it for the year, then pull the motor and do a rebuild/ mild stroker next winter, the trickflow top end can be used for a 331/347 too (not to mention it's porting potential)

Honestly though, with excellent compression accross all 8 and that one fouled plug, I'm thinking it MUST be in the heads (unless I somehow cracked an oil ring in that cylinder, while the compression ring is in tact)
Click to expand...

Sounds like sound decision making. I think going with an HCI is a good choice. If it doesn't work, you can still re ring the block.

Kurt
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
310
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
309
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
L
Engine Normal Leakdown Results (unstarted in nearly 2 years)
  • Lube
  • May 26, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 1, 2024
Blackhawkxx
Engine No start issue AGAIN!
  • ucnhtmenow1
  • Sep 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
953
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2024
89ripper
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?