• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Opinions Please

  • Thread starter Thread starter CMilStang
  • Start date Start date Feb 11, 2004

CMilStang

New Member
Jan 29, 2004
26
0
0
Feb 11, 2004
#1
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #1
I am looking to improve my suspension and driveability. As far as the suspension I am looking towards Subframes and Lower Control Arms. Are one of the two better for traction? Which one should I get first? Also I am thinking about an aluminum driveshaft.

Here are the packages I am considering.
#1- Subframes and LCA's
#2- LCA's and Aluminum driveshaft
#3- Subframes and Aluminum Driveshaft

Where would I see the most improvement for what it is?
 

01GT eibach

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,075
0
36
Pittsburgh, PA
Feb 11, 2004
#2
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #2
The driveshaft is ... IMO ... the least important of the three. Based on how the car is constructed, sub-frames are a MUST (even for non-modded Sunday-driver Mustangs). Then come LCA's. The stock LCA's are made of a u-shaped cheap-o stamped metal that flex unbelievably -- it is amazing what a decent of aftermarkets can do to the car's handling characteristics. The driveshaft mod is a good mod ... car will noticably rev up faster.
 

CMilStang

New Member
Jan 29, 2004
26
0
0
Feb 11, 2004
#3
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #3
Thanks... I see that you have the KB Super Subs. Do you like them or would recommend another kind?
 
C

cmilvette

New Member
May 4, 2003
4
0
0
Feb 14, 2004
#4
  • Feb 14, 2004
  • #4
I feel you should put a nut on top of the shocks for better handling. As far as driveability, I would add a new accel coil to the engine section.

Always feel the road when you drive for any clues to the conditon.

Thanks.
 

CMilStang

New Member
Jan 29, 2004
26
0
0
Feb 15, 2004
#5
  • Feb 15, 2004
  • #5
thank ya Wilcox.
 

Bone Racing

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
1,075
0
0
Long Island, NY
Feb 15, 2004
#6
  • Feb 15, 2004
  • #6
IMO all 3 are essential to any buildup
and all 3 are on the cheap side of the MOD's world

do em all
 

menasci

Member
Aug 17, 2003
640
1
16
Chandler, AZ
Feb 15, 2004
#7
  • Feb 15, 2004
  • #7
CMilStang said:
I am looking to improve my suspension and driveability. As far as the suspension I am looking towards Subframes and Lower Control Arms. Are one of the two better for traction? Which one should I get first? Also I am thinking about an aluminum driveshaft.

Here are the packages I am considering.
#1- Subframes and LCA's
#2- LCA's and Aluminum driveshaft
#3- Subframes and Aluminum Driveshaft

Where would I see the most improvement for what it is?
Click to expand...

I would go with #1.
I have the MM Full-Length SFC's.
I also have the FRPP Aluminmum Driveshaft.
The SFC's made a huge difference in the cars handling and it is a good investment for the car.
Didn't notice a difference with the Driveshaft, but it looks cool.
I don't have the LCA's yet. But I think they would be better than the Driveshaft.
 

01GT eibach

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,075
0
36
Pittsburgh, PA
Feb 16, 2004
#8
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #8
CMilStang said:
I see that you have the KB Super Subs. Do you like them or would recommend another kind?
Click to expand...
I definitely would recommend them for all "moderate" applications. If the car is going to be driven/raced hard, then spend the extra bucks and get MM full length.
 

CMilStang

New Member
Jan 29, 2004
26
0
0
Feb 16, 2004
#9
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #9
I went with #1. My car has a few things done to it (it will keep up with cars that have 320hp and beat some of them) and I need traction more than anything. Thanks for all the opinions.
 

KJ Hoppus

New Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,008
0
0
Elk Grove CA
Feb 16, 2004
#10
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #10
i would go this, LCA and MM subframes.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Feb 16, 2004
#11
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #11
#1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Steering stops not connecting
  • ELP1
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
231
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
ELP1
E
Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
329
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
131
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?