• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Out of ideas

  • Thread starter Thread starter 351wstangjk
  • Start date Start date Jun 11, 2007
3

351wstangjk

New Member
Aug 10, 2006
5
0
0
nashville TN
Jun 11, 2007
#1
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #1
I have a 351w efi in a 92 fox that runs like complete crap accept w/o throttle or if I unplug the o2 sensors. Symptoms are it runs extremely rich,has a miss below 2500 and hesitates when you hit the pedal. I have new o2's and a new o2 harness, I've changed the tps,m/a,act,ect,changed injectors, searched for vacuum leaks, changed fuel pressure up and down, changed timing up and down, checked TDC for dizzy, done comp test( all cylinders 155 give or take 3 pounds),I ran computer test ,codes were engine off(31 67 81 29 41 91 ) engine on (94 44 31 61 81). I did have the egr off so I put it back on the car it is hooked up with vacuum but its not on the engine itself do to I have a spyder intake. nothing has worked except to put it into open loop, but the car gets 9mpg and blows smoke like a freighttrain when you get on it. I also have cleaned all connectors and checked all the grounds. One question I have is it possible to fry part of the ECU but not the whole thing? I have tried everything I can think of, please any input would be appreciated
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
Jun 11, 2007
#2
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #2
351wstangjk said:
One question I have is it possible to fry part of the ECU but not the whole thing? I have tried everything I can think of, please any input would be appreciated
Click to expand...


I've fixed a Mustang that had idle problems, as if the IAB was stuck open... The guy sent the car to two garages, changed most of the sensors... The car started up great but would revv past 3000rpm at idle unless you unplugged the IAB.

I took apart the EFI harness and found a short in the IAB wires, fixed the harness but the car still worked like junk. I changed the computer and now his car runs like a dream.

You have a lot of codes, try to cure those before changing the computer. Or put that computer in another Mustang and see if the problems persists.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 11, 2007
#3
  • Jun 11, 2007
  • #3
Codes: 41 & 91
What ecu are you using?
What injectors are you using?
What MAF meter/sensor are you using?

Code 29:
Did you install the VSS?

Code 61:
Check the ECT output at the ecu.

That is all I can think of off the top of my head...

JRichker has some excellent writeups on tracking/fixing diagnostic codes...

jason
 
3

351wstangjk

New Member
Aug 10, 2006
5
0
0
nashville TN
Jun 12, 2007
#4
  • Jun 12, 2007
  • #4
The ecu is a stock 92 unit and as for the injectors #30 with a c&l the, I have not changed the VSS yet, I will this weekend and I'm gona switch out my ECU with a friend of mine to see what happens and as for the codes the emission codes are permanant because all emission components are gone but I will try to elimanate what I can, Thanks for the input
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jun 12, 2007
#5
  • Jun 12, 2007
  • #5
Code 41 or 91 - O2 indicates system lean. Look for a vacuum leak or failing O2 sensor.

The computer sees a lean mixture signal coming from the O2 sensors and tries to compensate by adding more fuel. Many times the end result is an engine that runs pig rich and stinks of unburned fuel.

The following is a Quote from Charles O. Probst, Ford fuel Injection & Electronic Engine control:
"When the mixture is lean, the exhaust gas has oxygen, about the same amount as the ambient air. So the sensor will generate less than 400 Millivolts. Remember lean = less voltage.

When the mixture is rich, there's less oxygen in the exhaust than in the ambient air , so voltage is generated between the two sides of the tip. The voltage is greater than 600 millivolts. Remember rich = more voltage.

Here's a tip: the newer the sensor, the more the voltage changes, swinging from as low as 0.1 volt to as much as 0.9 volt. As an oxygen sensor ages, the voltage changes get smaller and slower - the voltage change lags behind the change in exhaust gas oxygen.

Because the oxygen sensor generates its own voltage, never apply voltage and never measure resistance of the sensor circuit. To measure voltage signals, use an analog voltmeter with a high input impedance, at least 10 megohms. Remember, a digital voltmeter will average a changing voltage." End Quote

Testing the O2 sensors
Measuring the O2 sensor voltage at the computer will give you a good idea of how well they are working. You'll have to pull the passenger side kick panel off to gain access to the computer connector. Remove the plastic wiring cover to get to the back side of the wiring. Use a safety pin or paper clip to probe the connections from the rear. The computer pins are 29 (LH O2 with a dark green/pink wire) and 43 (RH O2 with a dark blue/pink wire). Use the ground next to the computer to ground the voltmeter.

Note that all resistance tests must be done with power off. Measuring resistance with a circuit powered on will give false readings and possibly damage the meter. Do not attempt to measure the resistance of the O2 sensors, it may damage them.

Testing the O2 sensor wiring harness
Most of the common multimeters have a resistance scale. Be sure the O2 sensors are disconnected and measure the resistance from the O2 sensor body harness to the pins on the computer.



The O2 sensor ground (orange wire with a ring terminal on it) is in the wiring harness for the fuel injection wiring. I grounded mine to one of the intake manifold bolts

Replace the O2 sensors in pairs if replacement is indicated. If one is weak or bad, the other one probably isn't far behind.


You mentioned a C&L MAF: do you have the MAF sensor that matches the computer? Have you tried rotating the MAF housing to see if it changes the operation of the engine?
 
3

351wstangjk

New Member
Aug 10, 2006
5
0
0
nashville TN
Jun 14, 2007
#6
  • Jun 14, 2007
  • #6
I just wanted to thank you for the response, and tell you I swapped part after part with one of my friends , it was the IAC was bad and its the only thing I didnt replaced in my list, I guess it is always the simpliest dumbest thing you dont check. Thanks again
 

Mr Grim

New Member
Dec 29, 2006
58
0
0
Jun 14, 2007
#7
  • Jun 14, 2007
  • #7
Glad you got it nailed down! Thanks for the update.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Electrical Ron Francis Headlight / Alternator Harness
  • dan50
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
221
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2026
dan50
B
Engine Another no start after washing engine bay
  • bruno
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
709
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Strange issue with timing Fixed
  • 2003 mustang gt modded
  • Oct 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
352
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 4, 2025
2003 mustang gt modded
M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
393
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
D
Engine 85 GT Backfires through Carb
  • DienstXIV
  • Oct 3, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
690
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2025
85GTStangGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?